Really puts things into perspective

Really puts things into perspective...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=G0ybCrr8c4g
web.archive.org/web/20180218114043/https://www.polygon.com/2018/2/16/17007762/kingdom-come-deliverance-impressions
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>muuuh graphix
>top is console version

shills on full force today

>top is console version

If only you could actually play the lower one without running into fucked up bugs every 5 seconds if the game even starts

Both of them are fantastic games though, and although Kingdom Come Deliverance is made for a lot less and still looks really good the Witcher 3 is incredibly polished and very varied storywise

Question is how western game developers shit out $100 million titles that are absolutely god awful when it comes to gameplay and bug out worse than an ant hive

I take back my words, this is PC version on lowest settings because even the console version has a better lod, this is low quality bait

their budget wasn't million you complete pleb! How can you be so dumb and misinformed and still go on a shill crusade? You literally have no brain.

wasn't 5 milion*

I just played Witcher 3 for the first time about a month ago. Dropped it after about 15 hours.

The hand holding and terrible character control was just too much for me.

I'm glad you know more about the screenshot than I that myself took on PC with everything set to ultra. Faggot.

Had a similiar experience when I played Witcher 3 for the first time

Marketing budget and wages

Good programmer make 5kUSD/month in Prague. 15k in US.

I cant wait for open worlds to finally have shit going on in them

Shut up you shill.The above is OBJECTIVELY the best game of all time and you're a complete retard if you think otherwise.The below is a rip-off that steals original ideas from "The Witcher III:Wild Hunt" and doesn't come anywhere near close to 0,0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% of the greatness of Geraldo.Also Witcher 3's graphics are better and morally greyer.

Can I get that bottom screenshot at higher resolution and without all the added junk?

Compare Witcher 2 to Kingdom Come.
2.5 mil vs. 5 mil.
I think it's apparent that graphics have a limit regardless of the budget.

>400
da fug?

Kingom Come at best looks like an updated Oblivion, mostly because the inspiration for the asset came directly from that.

Thete is a mod which removes hud

Nazi efficiency

>Mass Effect: Andromeda
>800~ employees
>Budget 100 million USD

""""""eurojank""""""

Heres another

>2 absolutely boring forests

yawn..

The lighting is top notch

>mostly because the inspiration for the asset came directly from that

Pretty sure the inspiration for the trees came from trees, the inspiration for the rocks came from rocks and the inspiration for the Czech 15th century architecture came from Czech 15th century architecture

>a game that has focused on realistic looking forests looks like an updated game that focused on realistic looking forests
Wow, amazing insight.

are you posting that garbage ironically?

This is the only screenshot I've seen so far that looks good.

>some guy's drug fueled imagination put into a sterile 3D environment
yawn...

>Top
Provided more jobs and produced GOTY
>Bottom
A buggy mess through an engine they didn't build

Almonds, activated, etc

>5mil budget
t. brainlet

I'd honestly rather just have worse graphics and games that run better
Playing games that are about five years old is bliss

Also Kingdom Come really suffers in terms of writing, there's indies with no budget at all that show it up in that aspect

Cuuurazzzeyy scenery
wooooww
way better

...

>lying on the internet
I think I've played the game long enough to know how it looks like on ultra, If only I had a fast enough internet i'd re-download it to prove that you're a filthy lying scum

Heres a whole series of screenshots linked together for you

youtube.com/watch?v=G0ybCrr8c4g

>engines

What's wrong with its writing?

Oh and by the way, that was 3 years ago.

3
fucking
years

salty

yea it IS better. thx

It's pretty flat for general conversations and the quests themselves have no real interesting twists and turns or decisions.

It's serviceable like a tes game without ever being interesting

>KC
>5 million
KC was also way buggier and Witcher was much larger in scale

Is KC:D a hard game?

Usual slightly hard at the start easy at the end shit

They both have shitty gameplay.
One of them is handholding galore and the other is empty as fuck.

>Comparing historical story to tes

What a fag.

you can cheese your way through a lot of stuff but if you stick to playing it straight it can be pretty tough

>Witcher 3: The Wild Downgrade

>have historically accurate setting
>uses a generic fantasy storyline
Yawn

Historical fiction is an entire genre of writing and most of that manages to not being boring as shit

Is this supposed to look good?

Playing TW3 in german

tfw can't even buy fable 3 now

>KC was also way buggier
I wouldn't say that. I mean TW3 had game-breaking bugs in the fucking main story alone.

Witcher 3 has dull as shit art direction. Just look at thisNo art direction whatsoever. It's worse than Ubisoft AAA games. It's so bland and forgettable. It's a fucking fantasy game but it looks like any forest you can find in Poland.

>that gif
kekd

There are so many ignorant shills in this thread.Maybe if you actually knew Geraldo you would accept it's the best game so far.

Are you? Because you sure don't.

I get the feeling that this user and the op are just some europoor slavkids with poor education and a retarded agenda. Seriously, his arguments and false facts take me back to middle school

Why are people still impressed by retarded boring forests

>Witcher 3 runs on ultra at 60 fps
>Kingdom Come deliverance runs on High at 53 fps

Kingdom Come is pretty to look at but it runs like absolute ass

???

Even normie websites know it's a boring game
web.archive.org/web/20180218114043/https://www.polygon.com/2018/2/16/17007762/kingdom-come-deliverance-impressions

Ugly and dumb! Add unfunny to the mix and you get your average Kingdom Come shill.

Witcher 3 looks better. Kingdome Come looks generic and washed out.

because, its a photorealistic art style that happens to often be applied to forests.

If the same photorealism was applied to your game, it would look a fuck load better.

You don't know shit then Jerry

Wow I sure love these COMFY and IMMERSIVE open worlds with nothing in them where over 50% of the playerspace is taken up by fillter trash like trees.


I would take a linear experience anyday over having to slog through mountains and vast plains of nothingness, but people seem to love these screenshot simulators.

>photorealistic art style

Is Kingdom Come an open world game with quests and all that or is it linear?

Yes?

>thread about apples
>posts oranges
10/10

>KC
>5 million
Are KCfags underage slavfags? This is as retarded as when they claimed it had more players than Skyrim’s launch

>polygon

Back to >>>/resetera/

Just like real life

>boring muh realism
>artstyle

Witcher 3 had 240 employees and KC:D was payed for mostly by a private investor. So don't get you're dick too hard.

>imagine not appreciating both games.

Kingdom come has to be one of the ugliest games I’ve ever seen

>Both of them are fantastic games though
w3 is mediocre. havent played kc yet but i like al of vavras older games

>let me crank up the resolution and nothing else

It looked better on my shitrig that could only do 30fps, your memes have no power here.

Difference is you'd get something more meaningful out of doing it in real life than being a fat cunt basking in the glow of a monitor at the dead of night gawking at scenery you could go out and experience yourself.

...

I'm not sure what to appreciate about witcher 3 besides the grafix in some of the areas and the characters

Well yes as it is computer game graphics, and not an actual photo, its an art style.

Any other questions?

Reads like a youtube comment.

>real life is an artstyle

>game set in fictional Eastern Europe
>forest looks like any forest in Eastern Europe

dumb jerry poster

user, its a game, not real life.

looks better than OPs picture

>appreciating SJW trash

Really puts things into perspective

>foliage distance scale less than half

i can't be bothered to check any others

Pirated it a few hours ago, finished the tutorial, not a single bug or crash. What bugs did you encounter?

hello witcher shill. got a question. I played through the main game and it was ok. solid 6/10. gameplay was atrocious and exploration worthless. do the expansions fix the open world at least? I know the gameplay is impossible to fix but do they add items throughout the world that aren't just worthless items replaced by something you can craft 30 seconds later?

answer truthfully

Currently you'd get the same experience. Instagram simulating the screenshots, walking simulator being going out of your home, getting on public transportation, go to the place to prove on social media you went there, eat to heal up, and public transportation back home.
Modern city life is just the same.

theyre trying their best to recreate reallife without putting anything else in the game that might not be "realistic", it's boring and fucking bland.

On PC you can improve the graphics of Witcher 3 by using the super turbo lighting mod and it doesn’t even put a dent in the fps

CP red have only 150 employees tho