Game has more cut content than Mafia 2

>Game has more cut content than Mafia 2
>People consider it good

Uhm, no sweetie, that's not how it works. Bully is unfinished garbo.

Other urls found in this thread:

bully.wikia.com/wiki/Beta_Changes
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>want to talk about game
>so filled with Sup Forums nigger contrarianism the only way can OP a thread is by bashing it
>"p-please talk about this game I love Sup Forums..."

I'm not your sweetie, fagstick

>he judges games by what they aren't instead of what they are
WEW LAD

I'm serious

Then Mafia 2 should be considered a good game. Not having proper melee combat didn't make the game worse for me

MH OP posting has ruined this site.

What missing content?

>game is unfinished/bad
>doesn't say why
Why did you make this thread?

How can Mafia 2 be considered a good game when Mafia 1 did everything better?

bully.wikia.com/wiki/Beta_Changes

Like Mafia 2, it feels like you're being trained for something bigger. Many of the missions in Bully are tutorials for things that don't go anywhere or expand in any meaningful way.

>Many of the missions in Bully are tutorials for things that don't go anywhere or expand in any meaningful way.
Such as?

The dating mission. Really doesn't add up to much compared to the fully featured dating system in San Andreas

>most of the changes are due to console limitations or inconsequential character outfit swapping to avoid legal trouble.
I don't see the problem.

just because content was cut doesn't mean it's not finished.

That doesn't seem like much. Most of that stuff isn't even cut content, it's just changes.

Mafia 2 was criticized for its cut content despite being an incredibly good game.

But they are repeated multiple times, have an effect outside of their missions, and play into Jimmy taking over each clique.

Just because another game does something better doesn't mean it's bad in the case of the former. You said they don't go anywhere or are meaningful when that's false on both grounds.

If you can say why they are objectively bad, go ahead. Other games having different systems doesn't say anything.

Mafia 2 WAS a good game.

That doesn't argue what he said about cut content not meaning unfinished. Also, what does it matter what people said about Mafia 2? They are different games with different content that got cut.

>have an effect outside of their missions

Not really. The "faction system" is more linear than a Telltale game and can't be influenced by things outside the missions

>Mafia 2
>Incredibly good
Even if you judge it on its own merits, without comparing it to Mafia 1, it was just okay. Incredibly short, not fleshed out in the slightest, basic story, nothing stands out about it at all.
I'd literally rather read through some VNs than play Mafia 2

Even if you judge it on its own merits, without comparing it to previous GTAs, Bully was just okay. Incredibly short, not fleshed out in the slightest, basic story, nothing stands out about it at all.
I'd literally rather read through some VNs than play Bully

>Not really
you cannot romance any of these characters without first doing their romance missions.
>more linear than a Telltale game and can't be influenced by things outside the missions
Is that objectively bad?

You keep making comparisons to other games but you still have not once said why anything in the game is bad. Some games have less content than others. That does not make them bad games. I'm having a hard time taking you seriously when you keep ignoring this.

But using a mechanig in a single mission and then never revisiting it is a thing in a lot of Rockstar games. GTA has been getting worse and worse about this.