What Linux are you running?

What Linux are you running?

Kali Linux

The good one

Debian testing on laptop, fedora and ubuntu on desktops

The one with the useful software: none

3.19

Just Debian Stretch on a few servers

None since I do not suffer from mental illness.

Darwin

Arch, and what is that distro user?

Edgy 12 year old detected.

epik!

gnu/linux*

Antargos because I love pamac for managing AUR packages.

AFAIK plain Arch doesn't have an alternative.

Fedora on laptop and desktop, debian on server.

...

debian 8.4 with xfce on all my memepads

Manjaro 16.06 pre 3

*Linux

this amnesiac and tkol are their best
prove me wrong

Ubuntu MATE 14.04

Arch with xfce.

doe@paprika:~$ uname -r
4.4.0-22-generic

Manjaro with xfce

OP's thread is clearly about the Linux kernel.

GNU Linux-libre is the best.

4.5.2-1-zen

Mac OS X because I actually go outside and I'm not an autistic sperglord

Right now I'm running Gentoo, just because I wanted to check "install Gentoo" off my bucket list. It's not hardened though. I'll probably try doing that soon.

Elementary OS

Gnome

Me too, it's flawless and comfy.

Ubuntu on server, laptop. Going to reinstall my server with 16.04 later today probably. Have an urge to go back to Debian but can't really think of a good reason to go back to it.

Xubuntu 16.06 as of right now. Kind of want to go back to Manjaro, but I'm not sure if I can be arsed right now.

windows 10

>running a downstream and unsupported version of Ubuntu with a bad version of gnome 3 as the DE
hola reddit

went from elementary OS > Mint and im never looking back.

Manjaro but thinking about Architect Openbox or Bunsenlabs.

linux arch

It has nothing to do with GNOME 3. The whole desktop environment and window manager is made from scratch.

how bout archbang?

Me too

if we're talking about budgie then you're wrong my friend, it's gnome centric and borrows heavily from gnome, and relies on many gnome services

>being this much of pedant

4.5.3 with ck's patchset

pls share your bar script

Budgie is from Solus OS. Elementary uses Pantheon.

Pantheon looks and functions just like gnome. It's a copy cat and its a poor one.

bfy tw/5es9
Number 5 and number 8

Thanks

Nope. Even the architecture of it is very different. The whole desktop environment consists of a couple modular parts: Gala - the window manager, Plank - the dock, Wingpanel - the top bar and Slingshot - the application launcher. The UX and UI is way better than Gnome.

i literally have the same desktop with only two GNOME extensions installed ...

No, you don't. It might look a little similiar, but it won't ever work as well.

It's in the download list. That's basically Arch +OB ,right?

Android

Windows 7

4.6

anyone who isn't updated is a fag

Ubuntu GNOME 16.04

Broken, buggy and try hard mac clone.

I personally don't have any issues with it, hasn't crashed once.

Xubuntu 15.10

Kubuntu 16.04
I like it a lot more than unity

It was very unstable on my HP G6 laptop.

Should have gotten a better laptop

ya

My laptop does not need to cater to the OS, the OS should adjust to whatever hardware I decide. This is why Linux is 0.0005% of desktop market share and no one takes you idiots seriously. Always chastise the user for not having the 'right' setup.

Get fucked.

sabayon on live usb and android 6 on a couple mobile devices

That laptop probably cannot technically run that OS, because it's not powerful enough to handle the desktop effects.

only intelligent posters in this thread.

You can install pamac on Arch

Custom built 4.5.0 kernel with nouveau boost patches

>downloading upscaled anime only to shrink the size

Ubuntu mate with cinnamon
>Am I autistic yet

4.5.1-arch

nice trips+dubs+dubs

...

i use elementary too!

>Ubuntu-based Mac clone
>Emacs

You have both of these. However, you only know how to use one, and it's not Emacs.

I run ubuntu linux on windows.
I think the version is 3 but i use android linux right now and can't check.

4.4.0-22-generic

it's what ubungu is on now

It just works.

Name of the font used in the taskbar, please.

>Hates everything mac
>Configs his OS to look just like OSX

kek

#1 SMP Debian 4.5.3-1 (2016-05-07)

G E N T O O
E
N
T
O
O

I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/LInux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

#1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt25-2 (2016-04-08)

post css

Lubuntu on my ThinkPad
Windows 7 host with mint, debian stable, and Ubuntu server vms on my gay man desktop
Debian stable headless running owncloud on my old laptop

I'm terribly sorry for interjecting another moment, but what I just told you is GNU/Linux is, in fact, just Linux, or as I've just now taken to calling it, Just.Linux. Linux apparently does happen to be a whole operating system unto itself and comprises a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Most computer users who run the entire Linux system every day already realize it. Through a peculiar turn of events, I was misled into calling the system "GNU/Linux", and until now, I was unaware that it is basically the Linux system, developed by the Linux project.

There really isn't a GNU/Linux, and I really wasn't using it; it is an extraneous misrepresentation of the system that's being used. Linux is the operating system: the entire system made useful by its included corelibs, shell utilities, and other vital system components. The kernel is already an integral part of the Linux operating system, never confined useless by itself; it functions coherently within the context of the complete Linux operating system. Linux is never used in combination with GNU accessories: the whole system is basically Linux without any GNU added, or Just.Linux. All the so-called "GNU/Linux" distributions are really distributions of Linux.

10

is it in the arch repos yet? I upgrade my media center to 4.5 last week and it's unable to detect my hdd (first time in 10 years i've had this problem), not really sure why but a couple other have this same problem hopefully by now its fixed.

>2000 packages

No, Richard, it's 'Linux', not 'GNU/Linux'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to Linux were the creation of the GPL and the GCC compiler. Those are fine and inspired products. GCC is a monumental achievement and has earned you, RMS, and the Free Software Foundation countless kudos and much appreciation.

Following are some reasons for you to mull over, including some already answered in your FAQ.

One guy, Linus Torvalds, used GCC to make his operating system (yes, Linux is an OS -- more on this later). He named it 'Linux' with a little help from his friends. Why doesn't he call it GNU/Linux? Because he wrote it, with more help from his friends, not you. You named your stuff, I named my stuff -- including the software I wrote using GCC -- and Linus named his stuff. The proper name is Linux because Linus Torvalds says so. Linus has spoken. Accept his authority. To do otherwise is to become a nag. You don't want to be known as a nag, do you?

(An operating system) != (a distribution). Linux is an operating system. By my definition, an operating system is that software which provides and limits access to hardware resources on a computer. That definition applies whereever you see Linux in use. However, Linux is usually distributed with a collection of utilities and applications to make it easily configurable as a desktop system, a server, a development box, or a graphics workstation, or whatever the user needs. In such a configuration, we have a Linux (based) distribution. Therein lies your strongest argument for the unwieldy title 'GNU/Linux' (when said bundled software is largely from the FSF). Go bug the distribution makers on that one. Take your beef to Red Hat, Mandrake, and Slackware. At least there you have an argument. Linux alone is an operating system that can be used in various applications without any GNU software whatsoever. Embedded applications come to mind as an obvious example.

Thanks for listening.

If I may interj... nevermind.

echo $INTERJECTION

>how to trigger an archfag

Share that wallpaper, family

>Linux
#!++

>caring this much about the shell and utilities
>not understanding gnu runs on any OS
>not understanding kernel, drivers and daemons are the main part (especially in a monolithic kernel with built in filesystems)
>then package manager
>then desktop environment
>then shell (doesn't matter which one as long as its posix)
>$current year
>not understanding

Pity PearOS is defunct.

I've been running LXLE after Linux Lite 2.6 crapped out on my network adapters.