How would you rate these three logos?

How would you rate these three logos?

Other urls found in this thread:

boards.Sup
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

> flat
> trendy
> 90s

Tux is the best because it appeals to small children and adults with developmental issues thanks to its friendly cartoon feel, which is excellent news since that is exactly the demographics likely to use it.

>windows
Plain and boring. 2/10

>os x
Really just an X but still manages to look more interesting than the Windows logo thanks to the colors. 6/10

>linux
Pure autism. Is this the logo of an operating system or a game for kids? 0/10

>MemeOSX
I hate that douchey, cunty vibe that Crapple always has.

Pretty good
Great
Awful

Funnily enough this matches with the OSs.

Good and memorable
Good and unmemorable
Terrible, but memorable

But user, tux always creeped me out as a kid.

>design hipster bullshit
>design hipster bullshit
>pedo penguin

> Meh
> Hmm
> Kek

Visual appeal is inversely proportional to technological capability, the irony.

Typical virus scanner malware is visually appealing.
Typical god-tier GNU software is visually disturbing.

>Crapple
hahaha, good one

>windows 5/10
Their tacky old colourful shit was better. Now it just looks plain lazy
>osx
It's obvious they're trying to go for the hip $waggy hipster look but it's the best out of the three.
>linux
god damn retarded. looks like a logo for a day-care center where children get molested

Did I meme well, senpai?

>Windows
Works well as keyboar button
>Apple
I guess could work as button but a bit confusing with x and o
>Tux
Too detailed to be a good keyboard button

>looks like a window to me
>horseshit crap
>baby diapers logo

>Too flat, looks like Finland's flag a little (Thanks for rubbing in the fact that you killed Nokia, Microsoft)

>Clean as fuck, I like itt.

>Really fucking dumb logo. I'm not gonna say it looks outdated because everybody else said it, but why would you pick a fat penguin that was probably made in some shitty FLOSS alternative of 3DS Max as your fucking logo? Take a clue from other logos - your logo has to be simple, with relatively few features, and easy recognizable.

>minimal, I like it
>ridiculous, that gradient inside the X is disgusting
>childish, definitely needs an upgrade

But you know what? I always liked seeing the tux on the splash screen. Fuck it, penguins are awesome.

1: 9/10 - Pleasant to look at, simple design and colors.

2: 7/10 - Simple and nice to look at but it is just a circle with a really thin X in it.

3: 2/10 - 1 point for effort, 1 for being complex but also simple. At the end of the day it's a cartoon penguin that looks pretty bad and like it got found in an archive of mid-90's websites.

Although I don't use it my favourite logo is the modern FreeBSD one, the old/classic "beastie" one is almost as retard as Linux penguin but at least beastie was hand drawn.

No you didn't

>Typical god-tier GNU software is visually disturbing.
You say that but there's you can't prove it because there is no god-tier GNU software.

You have 0 knowledge on the subject, don't you? Do you even pipe?

...

>Windows
Weird combination of flat design and 3D perspective, but distinctive and minimal enough to be usable on any kind of media without much expense.


>OS X
A thin X in a circle. Looks like a manhole cover, ironically.
The landscape backdrop is not part of the logo itself, it's just one of the promos that were made for it. I would say this logo is not distinctive enough to be easily identifiable. If you place it in another context (say food product) nobody knows wtf does that logo stand for. An X in a circle? Does it mean it's not recyclable?

>Linux
Is that the logo of a toy store from the 90s? It's distinctive, but in a bad way. There's nothing special about the logo, it's basically just an infantile picture. How could you use that logo on business paper, for example? What's the link between a penguin and an operating system?

I don't like any of these logos, but probably the Windows logo is the most consistent with what it's supposed to represent (ie the shape of a window in a fake 3d perspective reminding you of what the product is actually called).

I would rate:
6/10
4.5/10
2/10

they all shit and they are in the same way shit as the systems they stand for whitch make them good again i guess?

Why is the mac logo a playstation controller button?

windows and os x look like they've been made in ms paint in 2 minutes (don't give me that minimalist bullshit, it's not creative at all) and linux looks like a logo for children's toys

>Pure autism. Is this the logo of an operating system or a game for kids? 0/10

You don't know what fun is..

First two are logos of operating systems. Third one is the mascot of a kernel.

Does Windows even have a logo or a mascot for its kernel? Check mate ms shills

That font is goat. They should make the logo flat though

5/10, super uninspired but it looks okay

8/10, decent, like the colours in the middle as well, gives it a very unique touch

0/10, looks really terrible colour-wise and looks like a cartoon.

>They should make the logo flat though
'no.'

This flat logo bullshit is just the current fad. You've simply been conditioned into thinking it looks good, just like people ten years ago were conditioned into thinking it looked lame.

>Linux
Well it could be worse.

OP you should kill yourself and leave this board. You're comparing 2 operating systems with a kernel.

Nice meme

>meh
>sexy
>uwotm8

>cool
>ugh
>cool

>How would you rate these three logos?
>You're comparing 2 operating systems

shit
shit
It's not a logo.

>logo
>logo
>mascot

>Windows
Shows what it has become. Less rich than it was before but still solid.
>OS X
The background aside, the logo represents its simplicity.
>Linux
Timeless mascot for a stagnant infrastructure.

2/10
3/10
11/10

Same faggot

>muh minimalism and material design. please like me
>this is the button that you will want to press
>fuck you, I'm a penguin

>a kernel isn't an operating system
spot the tech illiterate freetard

0/10
1/10
10/10

Sums it up pretty well. To be fair, Ubuntu logo looks pretty cool though.

GNU/Linux does not have or need a symbol. Though, the GNU website has a Gnu. The Linux kernel shouldn't have any symbol, but I suppose it makes those pretending a kernel is an operating system feel more dominant.

>fisherprice
>we love cocks
>literal autism

It's not

see

I saw it but it was typed by some moron. I don't read that stuff. Who are you?

That explains why adult men still watch eastern cartoons made for children

>rated 18+
>"made for children"

> ratings matter
Autism

>Minimalist and easily distinguishable, very good logo

>"muh blue and orange", but otherwise like Losedows, though a bit less aesthetically pleasing

>literally a meme

I'd like Tux a lot more if it didn't have that horrible shading on its eyelids. It doesn't look like he's dozing off, it looks like he's staring into your soul and also has cataracts on its sclera

You're on a website that caters to that sort of stuff. You communicate anonymously. How do you know you aren't communicating with mostly eastern cartoons?

CoD is rated 18+ in most countries too, it's still clearly aimed and children. Same with most anime.

1. looks like bars on a prison window.
2.looks like a cryptic error message.
3.looks like adorable flightless bird.

>Sup Forums - Technology
>caters to that sort of stuff
Off yourself weeb

that's actually a hundred times better than Tux, no joking or irony
I unironically love this as a logo

tux is the logo for the kernel, something nobody ever sees.

It really does, could use some finish though. Flat design will save everybody and everything!

>hating on the GNU
kysfam

>cryptic error message
Yep sounds like Linux

>W10 logo
>Material design
good job on showing you have absolutely no fucking clue what you're talking about

> easy recognizable
TUX IS easy recognizable!

Normie
Homo
Autist

t. Parjeet

Let's call him toox or töx

>Sup Forums
>a website
Hurry and hara kiri

>muh flat performance

To be honest, they're all shit.

Not even the original nip chan wasn't all weebshit

...

>not posting the GOAT logo

>

Wangblowz - 0 of 100
OS X - 10 of 100 (because it uses unix)
Linux over 9000 of 100

> Why you ask?
Because It's different from the first two logos, showing the true spirit of using (GNU)/Linux, rebellion against given standards, against normies!

pic: Tux on a fork

>6/10
>6/10
>4/10
boards.Sup Forums.org/gd/thread/263257/

I actually like the Linux logo.

Okay
Okay
Cancer

Gamer
Artist
Programmer

couldn't be more acurate

...

Tux is cool

Corporate
Artistic
Cute

Triple g, (ggg) on OP picture order
>garbage
>gay
>goddess (or god)

So you're on Sup Forums, and choose your 'g'

"The garbage will do" - Rey, the force awakens

>windows
its ok. just ok.

>os x
good.

>linux
exactly how i would expect a logo not owned by a company and therefore not updated since its birth to look

>Gaming
>Laptop
wyd bro xD

ITT:
OS I LIKE - AMAZING LOGO
OS I DON'T LIKE - SHIT LOGO

>sleek minimalism, professional
>artistic, beautiful, minimal
>we don't give a fuck

Fucking THIS

>People unironically masturbating to a logo that's nothing but an X, the least imaginative logo possible. It just happens to be the most liked letter there is.

Nah, I prefer Linux over OS X over Windows in that order, but I'll freely admit Tux looks like shit.

It would be more fair to use the logos from distros, though.

Windows
>Trying to appeal to people that won't use it anyway
OSX
>Boring, but looks nice
Linux
>Sums up both the good and the bad of linux perfectly

The Good, The Bad and The Ugly


You decide which is which!

(Tux: good, OS X: bad, Wangblowz: ugly)

>Laptop
>Gaming

gaming on a device that can never be calle d "Laptop" / "Notebook" / "useful electronic computer" since it only has ONE FUCKING PORT and a unbelievable shitty keyboard!

I wonder who would buy shch an absolute troll product ... I know APPLE SHILLS and KEKS!

How could anyone in theri right mind use this?

Picture the following scenario:
> """ writer """ is going to write something for his blog
> buys new macbook just for da lulz
> wants to type
> meh keyboard feels like shit
> I can't say it s bad, because it's made by apple, the never do silly products!!!

or this:
> Grandma has a macbook (for whatever reason)
> Has a digital camera with usb cable + USB-C to normal USB adapter
> wants to transfer family pictures from camera to pc
> o shit battery low
> need to charge
> oh no transfer not complete
> abort abort
> battery drained
> FUUUUUUUCK!

EVEN NORMIES WOULD RUN INTO IMMEDIATE PROBLEMS WITH ONLY ONE PORT!
EVEN
NORMIES!


AND IF ANYONE SAY "But thats Inovation, you have to go with the time, things go wireless ..."
NO ... fucking NO!

Inovation ... it's a form of progress, of making things BETTER than they were before
> VHS, DVD, BlueRay (well BlueRay is proprietary shit and currently hard to crack)
^ This is an improvement

> AM Radio (small bandwith + crackles while listening)
> FM Radio (higher bandwith + fewer distortions)
> DAB[+] (digital radio, almost no distorions + additional content)
These are also improvments!

> Many ports for different uses (Charging, File Transfer, connecting a HID)
> ONE PORT
THIS IS NOT AN IMPROVEMENT!
I reallly hope apple would see what they've done, instead of trolling customers

WHY CAN'T WE HAVE NICE THINGS

(cont)
Ok,
the wireless argument is ok, because why not, it is easier

BUT WHAT ABOUT BACKWARDS COMPATIBLITY?
What if somenone just got a $1000 camer a without a wireless chip? Would they ditch their expensive product just because it's 1 year old and doesn't hve wireless?

How can the tech world accept this?
Why do people buy this?


In the past you could have argued "They buy apple products because they are of good quality", whichc up to some point was true.
But now ... there is no more quality just Tim Cook trolling all apple-fanatics who literally just buy the product because its made by apple!
You CAN'T name a single reason why someone should buy this overprces glass, aluminum, plastic, battery, pcb abomination from hell!

>camer a
--> camera !

>hve
have

>whichc
which

> ... because its made ...
because it's made

>there is no god-tier GNU software
Emacs
That's about it.