AMD

GAME OVER
> The “beast mode” AIB cards that we mentioned earlier will feature a single six pin and a single eight pin design.
NVIDIOTS BTFO

Other urls found in this thread:

wccftech.com/amd-rx-480-faster-than-nano-980/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>wccftech.com/amd-rx-480-faster-than-nano-980/
> AMD RX 480 Edges Out R9 Nano & GTX 980 – Polaris 10 XT Runs At ~60c & Draws ~100W

BULLSHIT AND LIES

150W retard! 150!

DELETE THIS

...

This is as stupid as the cut vs. uncut threads on Sup Forums. AMDiscount and Nvidiots, please short circuit your lives.
With kind regards, everyone on this board.

150W TDP HOUSEFIRE

Inferior Ayymad technology 3 year old performance

>2016
>NVIDIA

1080 topping charts MAD can do NOTHING qgain

I'm stoked af for AMD, and even I know that WCCFTech is dodgy at best.

Not everyone is rich as you faggot.

>mfw when stock 480 matches 980 oc
>mfw it can probably reach/get close to 980ti/fury x levels with a real oc
>mfw when amd release beast mode 480 that will outperform 980 ti/1070 for 300 burgers

Oh wow 390x aka rebranded 290x performance in 20 fucking 16 I can barely contain my excrement

They leaked the $200 price point before it was announced, so I daresay they have a source

400£
>rich

Nigga I spent 2000$ on a laptop which i didnt need some months ago for shits and im average payed

Or just get the 220$ model with a good cooler and plenty of VRM and OC it yourself

the 390x wasn't simply a rebrand, they were newly manufactured chips

You weren't saying that when the 980 came out with nothing more than less power.

>mid-end card

why dont the new 4xx cards have HBM
was HBM a meme?

These are mid-range cards you cunt.

Why don't Nvidia high end have HBM?

HBM1 was a meme.
HBM2 makes the meme supreme.

8GB or 16GB HBM2 1TB/s memory bandwidth will be unreal. The problem is designing a graphics chip that can even use up half of that bandwidth

Why don't honda civics have 50psi turbo engines?
Was 1980s F1 tech a meme?

>Get aftermarket cooled one for $230
>Dump power into it
>Match 980 Ti
>200w
Fucking nice

so they are going to release cards with HBM on the new architecture, right?

Not really, at all.
Hawaii was bandwidth starved, without compression feqtures like DCC we would be using near 1TB/s on newer chips

490 (I think) and 490X Vega cards will run up to 16GB of HBM2, bud.

They do on their 15,000$ product. 1080 is mid-range too, it just has a 30% bigger die size.
14nm/16nm vs 28nm
200mm (RX 480)= 980/fury performance (previously 400/500mm size
300mm (1080)= 15% faster than 980 Ti performance (previously 600mm size)

I would say if you are serious about gaming at 4K, wait for 400mm die sizes, which is traditionally where the really powerful stuff starts coming along.

Nvidia and AMD released smaller die sizes to milk their customers, Nvidia's was slightly bigger and then they went ahead and charged 700$ for it

I'm really starting to grow tired of these threads.

fortunately those bandwidth issues are totally fixed with video compression that lowers bandwidth requirements by nearly 400%.

What once required a 500GB/s bus, one can now get away with 150GB/s and still have similiar performance

So a 512-bit bus of GDDR5X is probably capable of a TB/s too, and it should cost around the same as HBM.

at least HBM lowers power draw and takes up less space, makes it perfect for APU's and mobile GPU's

3 YEAR OLD PERFORMANCE IN 2016

AYYYMADKEKS ON SUICIDE WATCH

You idiots still don't get it that the 480 is a red herring? The real star is the 470, Polaris 10 PRO with 10% less performance and

It's going to be like this till the 29th and maybe even a week after.

All of these words and yet nvidia still can't match AMD in terms of outright performance.

>mfw every chart AMDkeks post up has Nvidia on the top

>r9 390
>1015 core clock
>CALLING THAT OC
what does that make my card running at 1140 core?

Underage b8

A golden chip

Less impressive than my '850mhz' 280X hitting 1190mhz.

We have good chips, there are also shit chips in the world

These are AMD's low end cards
AMD's low end cards are beating nvidia's high end cards of last gen

This can't be real, you can't be fucking serious.
I bought a 970 a month ago, FUCK YOU AMD

Polaris 10 is a (lower) middle-class chip.
Polaris 11 could be considered "Low-End", but the actual Low-End (as in, not much outside HTPC/Office/older Titles) can be found on AMDs x50/x40 as well as Nvidia's x40, and lower.

Greatness comes to those who wait~

How is it their fault that you're an idiot?

damn
So.. SLICK

And releasing 14nm cool zone tech less then half of a 1070. Why do you need a $500 card that runs the same shit a $200 card does?

I've seen 2 firestrike benchmarks today, one stating that 480 blows away oced 980 other claiming 480 falls short behind stock 980. Can you AMD shills make up your mind?

>it's another "Why do you need a *insert higher price* card that runs the same shit a *insert lower price* card does?" post

that's like asking why anyone should buy smartphones when a 2001 brick nokia is fundamentally the same. people make their own judgement on what they need based on price, performance and sometimes popularity (aka apple fags). i could be asking you why should i buy a $300 aftermarket 480x when i can buy a bottom end $400 gtx 1070 which will be ~40/50% more powerful for just 33% more in cost.

Ye brah enjoy that 3 fps gain in 4k gayming, I'm sure playing Witcher 3 at 29 frames instead of 26 is very much enjoyable.

you can't trust benchmarks, especially these days, I'm waiting for actual game average fps.

Except 1070 can easily run everything in maxed 1440p while 480 will be somewhere between 970 and 980 which is just perfect for 1080p. I admit that buying 1070 for a single 1080p monitor is retarded.

The only aftermarket worth getting is xfx for AMD. Their warranty justifies the high prices. Nvidia has EVGA. Everything else is garbage.

Don't worry these are all fake, 480 has been confirmed to have 960-tier performance in reality.

>XFX
Kill yourself and your semen-for-solder company.

proof, user?

Evga has been garbage since 2013. You're better off with Asus or Sapphire.

Common sense, knowledge of chips and circuits, my EE degree, AMD's general uselessness

i don't believe you, sorry user.

>Evga has been garbage since 2013.

i've have nothing but praise for evga in these last few years. the cheapest cards with great performance.

Sapphire is AMD's EVGA. XFX is really only great for that lifetime warranty.

>My gaping prolapsed asshole.

Go away Kyle, you're so buttblasted it's almost funny.

>Mad cause nvidiots aren't allowed to overclcok their graphics under warranty

>100W
>AMD

AHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
AMD THEMSELVES SAID IT USES 150W
FUCKING RETARDED PAJEET SITE

>hes shellshocked
i'm so sorry dude.

TDP =/= Power consumption

Go back to

You've heard wrong. Evga was wonky during 7xx and 9xx series. Customer reviews say it all. Go for ASUS for cooling or Sapphire for best oc. But who am I kidding, you're trying to push your buyers remorse on others.

They never said it uses 150W you fool, they never said anything, they just showed you a slide saying "Power: 150W"

Which can mean
TDP is 150W

>mfw when
>mfy face when when

Implying cheap Zotac isnt the godtier noisy leafblower aftermarket card you were looking for

Even if it uses 150W, what does 50W actually mean to you?
Are you that mong from a week ago that said that every 50W the ambient temp of the room grows by 2C?

>heard

i clearly implied that i myself have nothing but praise for them. i've had 2 of their cards in the last 2 years and they've both been very cheap compared to gigabyte, msi etc but have been solid overclockers. i'm running at 1508 mhz boost on my bog standard evga gtx 980.

i had a 970 before that which i donated to a cousin in need, but that too was a solid overclocker and was only £30 above stock reference price compared to all the other aftermarket vendors which were £50 and above.

>2000W heater in winter
>ambient temp is over 80C

Whew lad

feel free

>1984+32
>nvidia

This is 130% fake, AMD is incompetent stupid pajeet poo company.. They cant make good chips
Never trust AMD, did you see Bulldozer?

>If it uses 150W average it would fucking have power issues constantly due to the inadequate circuitry

that's what they did with the nano and goyim ate it up

>nivida fags in full defence mode

Feels good

Putting more CUs to existing architecture isn't making a new chip.

This
My Asus gtx 970 Black is clocked at +200/+500 with 120% power limit and +37mV and still runs in low 60s. DirectCu II is god tier cooler

It is, it involves a complete tape out and validation
But the 390X doesn't have more CU's, it's identical to the 290X, it has slightly better performance/power consumption since it's a much newer stepping and the process is much more mature

maybe for nvidia cards
asus is the worst you can get for amd cards

It's literally tech journalists pulling numbers out of their ass to get hits
Since Fury it has been a real shitfest anything related to GPU's

7970/280x wasn't respun and the 290/390 and 290x/390x weren't respins either, if they were AMD would have backported new stuff like trueaudio to the gcn 1.0 chips and the ASICs for video encoding/decoding would have been updated.

Yeah because 390x is rebranded OC version of 290x which was 7xxx rebrand archtecture. And by the looks 480 may be rebrand too. Enjoy your shitty techology from half a decade ago and wonder why is it so cheap

Please, pray tell, which chip is the 290X a rebrand of?

I'll give you a hint: the 7970Ghz became the 280X and they didn't make a solo chip in the 7xxx series better than that.

he's talking about the architecture. the changes in the various flavors of GCN after the introduction of the 7000 series was minimal, the biggest change in hawaii, tonga and fiji being the wider memory bus (and redesigned memory controller on fiji).

...

nigga I make $600 a month I cant afford these €799 cards

...

Try picking up a book and improving yourself

I can't afford books

>mfw just bought a 390x
oh well time to return it when vega comes out

Ask momma to buy one for you, learn second language

>mfw learning japanese right now

If all this bullshit is true, and the 480 @ 1266mhz really is as good as a Fury, with low temps and overclocking through the roof, the shitstorms will be amazing. A lot of people will still buy Nvidia this gen, because AMD's reputation is shit, but this wondercard will redeem a lot of AMD's street cred.

>60hz cucks

Nano had 1x8pin which was more than enough for its average 170W usage.

the nano throttled as soon as it was under any load (even a shitty 2d game load).

Obviously? It needed to keep clocks low to stay in that TDP, don't forget that it's a 275W Fiji XT chip.