>1366x768
1366x768
Ryder Wood
Blake Baker
>1920x1080
Owen King
>Not 16:10 and >=1920x1200
16:9 is terrible and its inferiority is made ever more grating by how close it is to the ideal. I don't want to live in this world.
Gavin Jones
>implying 1920x1080 is bad
Brody Foster
I use a 16:10 display, and I don't like it. I feel like 16:9 is better.
Wyatt Russell
They made TVs with 1366x768 as a resolution.
What was the point? Who was this for?
Andrew Parker
why? for your gaymes and movies?
Robert Wood
>no ejected casing
Camden Ramirez
>Implying 16:9 is better for any task
The only issue is viewing 4:3 content that's been padded to 16:9. Easily solved though.
I also wouldn't want to play games on a 16:9 monitor. I can't imagine why you think that's an argument someone would make.
Anthony Flores
...