Is more than 4 cores a meme?

Is more than 4 cores a meme?

Other urls found in this thread:

u-he.com/cms/diva
ebay.com/itm/Intel-Xeon-E5-2686-V3-QS-2-0Ghz-45MB-L3-18-Core-Max-3-5Ghz-120W-CPU-/272253745657?hash=item3f639679f9:g:H48AAOSwY0lXRWVZ
youtube.com/watch?v=N7jETCzhaVY
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

your use of meme is too ambiguous

two cores are enough for pretty much everybody

Not if your task is well parallelized.

>Not if your task is well parallelized.

so basically never.

>tfw I felt on the 2 cores and 2 threads per core meme

Depends on what you're doing. Sometimes 32 isn't enough, others 4 is overkill.

for gamaing 4 cores is enough in most cases

for web browsing 2 cores is enough (ask my pentium D) although the internet is more CPU intensive than ever

Depends are you
>Doing distributed computing and data processing and literally converting files from container to the next?

Or are you just
>Sitting around on your desktop playing video games

If you fit in the first group it's a no.
If you fit in the second group its a yes.

more cores = more fast, that;s why i bought a 64x core windows because 64 is WAY more than the 4 cores that most CPUs have