GTX 1060: ITS OVER AMD
Other urls found in this thread:
Sup Forums-gpu
>wccftech
DESIGNATED
SHILLING
>$299 founder's edition
Oh boy! $60 more for a card that's maybe 5% better gaming than the RX 480 and worse at compute tasks.
>"""""$250""""" MSRP
So in reality the FE at $299 and custom cards priced above that, just like the other Pascal cards.
The way its meant to be played.
AMD has no drivers.
>it's another cuck's card thread
>$299
which is 270€
that means 350€ in europe
which is $390
nice
you are right its over
) 980 at 1500 has 6.14tf
and
2) 1060 on 2050(assuming it will go that far) will have 5.04....
also
3) 480 on stock has 5.1 tfops..
good luck with that...
SA-GE
i agree with you, degenerate tripfag
>TFLOPS as the only metric you care about.
Paper specs are great. Video games are what people buy this card for and all it needs to do is perform at the level of a 980 at stock and it already beats a 480 out. And since its pascal it will actually overclock.
When will this "Founders Edition" meme end?
SAGGE
CRAAAAAAAAAAAWLING IIIIIIIIN MY SKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN
Huh, is that the actual PCB?
If that's the actual PCB, the 1060 has a 256bit memory bus and what you're getting is a cut down card. I would assume this means that the 1060 Ti if it ever comes out will be the exact same chip but fully enabled.
tfops is a metric to consider when someone claims a +15% faster while having 2.5 tflops less...
>what you're getting is a cut down card
What a stunning revelation. No one has ever done this before in the history of the world.
no what you are seeing here is a 1060 that is already a cut down from a cut down with 192 bus
and no way to charge a TI on it....
unless nvidia is actually doing those cards to make 1070 look fantastic...
Sup Forumspu
You seem to have made a bit of a mistake in your post. Luckily, the users of Sup Forums are always willing to help you clear this problem right up! You appear to have used a tripcode when posting, but your identity has nothing at all to do with the conversation! Whoops! You should always remember to stop using your tripcode when the thread it was used for is gone, unless another one is started! Posting with a tripcode when it isn't necessary is poor form. You should always try to post anonymously, unless your identity is absolutely vital to the post that you're making!
Now, there's no need to thank me - I'm just doing my bait to help you get used to the anonymous image-board culture!
You're a fucking retard who either can't count components or can't do math. That is 192bits of bus width.
If those vacant chips were populated, the bus width would have to be 256bits. Nvidia MCs have 32 bit bus each.
Bruh, he's a shill. Now we know to associate that trip with shilling.
if you want a gpu to do compute tasks why don't you buy used titans they are good at compute at cheap as fuck.
no sli. I aiit buying that shit
>bruh
kys
Sup Forumspu
poo in loo
THESE MOBOS THEY WILL NOT HEAL
there is no room to price a ti variant do you get it ?they charge a fe for 50 bucks more and if they give 50 more bucks to a shit tier ti variant and be close to 480 oc levels they will literally kill 1070 ...
they will probably just cut down 1070 price a bit
Ayyy
Newfag or Sup Forums detected
I don't see the 6-pin connector anywhere on that card.
This is troubling.
dis nigga is so mad b
F L U S H E D
When we have another holocaust.
Might want to learn how to count from 1-10 and basic multiplication before you throw around empty accusations.
its a cuckers dreams
passing 480 with no 6 pin
wait till you see what pcper will say..
>the card we measure it runnning only to 10 watts on torture and on 3 watts on gaming loop
Used titans are still like $400 most places. The 7970 is best compute performance for your dollar.
>Make short card
>Make it 12 feet long with the cooler
Why
Used titans go for about 150-200 now.
Titan x is a little different however.
So it doesn't burn your house ?
1060 CONFIRMED FOR 960 PERFORMANCE AT TWICE THE PRICE
>No SLI
wew
For VR the 1060 would be the better choice due to simultaneous multiprojection, but otherwise there is no obvious winner. 1060 may be a bit better than the RX 480 (but we don't know), but it's also a bit more expensive so you get what you pay for.
Teraflops are not the only metric to measure performance.
as i said.. i agree when the number is close preferably below 1
but when the number is just 2.5 tflops less there isnt any way that it can be competitive because both companies this time around has gone into compute instead of graphics so that give us a fairly decent view
SLI/crossfire is an incredibly niche thing that very few people do, especially on the low end. It creates more problems than it solves. SLI/crossfire is for enthusiasts who need 30% more performance than the highest end available single cards.
HOW CAN THEY EVEN COMPETE?!?!?!?!
But why would nvidia deny themselves easy snake oil sales?
How was today's leafy video famicom?
its true nvidia is a nazi master when its to create a shit graph
Because they aren't literally Hitler like Sup Forums makes them out to be.
youtube.com
6% slower than 980 lel
>1060 literally can not even display dx12
What's wrong with the graph?
you are either blind or blind..
I'm not blind. The graph shows a
.15, .25 and .45 times improvement. The last one is actually less, but I'm just gonna round it up.
the graph starts from the 0.80... not even on 1 lol
Why the fuck would you start it at 1? The red bar wouldn't exist, because it's chosen as the baseline.
Noone gives a fuck about your shitty continent.
welcome to nvidia marketing poo hq (not that amd dont use such a thing)
Welcome to graphs in general you mean? You're telling me that there is something wrong with a valid graph when there is nothing wrong with it.
Starting it at 0 is retarded, it's too long. Starting it at 1 is retarded, one of the bars disappears making the graph unreadable.
starting from 0 with 1 increase is what everyone on its mind does..and if that pcper video is true
youtube.com
then you can already blame nvidia for lying..
I'm actually start to feel bad for AMD. Like whenever they release something and feel on top of the world BANG Nvidia comes out with something better and they're back to the drawing board.
If you're going to start at 0 with 1 increase, you might as well just fuck off with graphs in general because that graph is about as helpful as an enema for a straight man.
Might as well just write 145% performance in category X if you're so anal about where your graphs start. It completely avoids using a graph rather than making the graph worthless.
inb4 those statements are for the 3gb version.
That can't SLI.
AMD fanboys sure are GREEEEEEEN with envy.
Live long the Nvidia master race.
You can look at your teraflops while The Witcher 3 stutters and hangs.
Show me one link for a Titan at $200. The cheapest on ebay I see is $340 after shipping.
amdkeks blown the fuck out
because pcbs cost money
and they probably require none to little modification for the cooler
Good.
lel sure i bet you have proof that it stutters right?
>192-bit bus
That's pretty cheap
>1 , 1.1 , 1.2 , 1.3 , 1.4 , 1.5
This is so pathetic, i bet the Zen will be the exact same situation, a piece of overhyped shit that runs hot and fails to deliver AT EVERY LEVEL.
boo hoo amdbabbies, 3gb is perfectly fine and 6gp is practically excessive.
your worthless little 4+4 GPU
good job nvidia really top notch 7 weeks on retail and you just managed to pass by a small pit the titan x that didnt even sold well
kek so much for the selling like hot cakes
No, my 4 years old 7970 is telling me otherwise on latest games.
Well, thats because it's an AMD GPU, it just hasn't got the superior memory management capacities that Nvidia cards feature.
there is no 3GB card, amdrones are just memeing/stupid
It isn't as good as a 7970 for $150
What's funny is ,that when I bought it, I first ordered a 680 2Gb.
Because it was a paper launch, I got tired of waiting for it after a month.
Now 680 is just fucking wrecked by a 7970.
>If I took off your cooler, would you die?
hehe, to you user ?
hehehehe
top kek i bet paid shills wont even comment on this shit lol
I don't get why this is. Does AMD have less money and more retarded engineers?
...
Yes exactly that. Most of their talent has migrated to Intel, Nvida, or other companies in recent years. They are trying to compete while be severely handicapped by lack of funds for R&D also.
Who is this absolute fabulous looking double-jacking faggot? I often see him in gifs around here and I always wondered if he was a cam whore, how big is he?
>480 OC levels
He is a hot stud that generally streams on GOOGLEMEFAGGOT.COM
lol what an absolute shit of a statement...
clearly you know nothing eh
GCN is literally inefficient because it targets both compute and graphics.
Their previous architecture is basically what NoVideo is doing today, getting much more graphics efficiency.
These assets may wield well for them with dx12 and Vulcan.
Also Samsungs 14 nm is low power design. It's fine for smartphones, but just doesn't scale well with power. Bad choice, I guess.
6% slower in a synthetic benchmark. If that is to be believed, it's still faster than the rx 480.
It only just began, so not soon.
Not all of them make the news but there have been many high profile employees make the jump to Nvidia or elsewhere.
>What is relative performance
gcn is a highly paraller uarch that was working on a envoriment of a highly serial api...
gcn uarch in general is far superior to whatever nvidia can offer in terms of hardware since its inception..
yes his work was done for amd just like keller one those guys arent really the kind of person that they hold any seat on companies..you would have known that already..