500 TB PER SQUARE INCH
gizmodo.com
Well I guess we now know exactly how dense storage can possibly get
500 TB PER SQUARE INCH
Elijah Gutierrez
Other urls found in this thread:
zmescience.com
twitter.com
Luis Hughes
>terabits
>TB
End you're selve.
Wyatt White
no u
Oliver Kelly
Too bad it needs to be done at subzero temperatures and a vacuum
Sebastian Morgan
>gawker media
>hard drive has to be stored at -200 C to make it work
Christian Anderson
whats gawker?
Blake Green
>62,5 terrabyte per 2.54cm^2
>-200 C
>vacum
>8000Bits so far
Jaxson Morris
>In its current form, the atomic hard drive can only operate in clean vacuum conditions and at liquid nitrogen temperatures, which is -346°F (-321°C).
>absolute zero is − 273,15 °C
Nathan Cook
Maybe its good for massive datacenters or the NSA
Daniel Murphy
>massive datacenters
>-321°C
Ian Rivera
bankrupt shit.
Gavin Reyes
>million dollar cooling cost daily
Joseph Johnson
Lads, what are we gonna do once storage devices reach the point where they encode information as 1 atom per bit? That's the end of physics. How can we possibly progress past that?
Within the next 50 years, will we see technology hit a massive stall?
Asher Perry
we could store dara in alternative demensions where we have enogth space and than wire them throgh a small wormhole
Lincoln Richardson
Dive down to quarks.
Its not like we're lacking anything beyond atom. Things always go smaller. You can divide quarks as well. Once past that, physics has to change to go smaller. So "limits of physics" can be bypassed with different physics theory.
Joseph Phillips
is that even possible? I thought alternate dimensions didnt exist
Luis Wood
The taxpayers can afford it.
Aaron Cook
So processors might use quarks once transistors are less than 1 atom in size?
Adrian Cox
They might use DNA, they might use photons, etc.
Doesn't mean much when the speculative physics aren't in reach for a while.
Xavier King
It's definitely going to be paired with quantum computers which need those temperatures anyways.
Jeremiah White
This is the dumbest fucking shit I've ever read. Max storage density per square inch could be 500TB but this is not taking into account V-NAND which stacks additional memory cells on top of each other to increase storage size. So max storage size per square inch cubed would be like 250,000 TB.
This is all assuming we never figure out how to manipulate dark energy or some shit to store data in.
Kayden Foster
Wasn't there a much more dense storage solution just recently?
Nathan Gutierrez
Mason James
>500 TB PER SQUARE INCH
TERA BITS NOT BYTES YOU FUCKING IDIOT
>500Tb PER SQUARE INCH
FTFY
Caleb Rodriguez
>-346°F (-321°C)
-346 F is -210 C.
Nice calculations you've got going there
Ian Gray
If only certain places had infinite cold... Perhaps some sort of giant natural freezer.
Jayden Davis
I don't know a ton of quantum, but we would probably have to start using dark matter and energy in a way. I don't think we can prove the existence of alternate dimensions with our current technology, though that's a possibility