What would happen if all the Linux developers teamed up in a single distro?

What would happen if all the Linux developers teamed up in a single distro?

Anime isn't real kiddo

they would all kill each other

Indeed!

Define real

A useless monstrosity

Nothing, even Android on x86 is more viable than this shit.

Seems like a good idea but Linux kernel devs ARE already teamed up.

Now most userland softwares are independent projects except for GNOME softwares

Why would kernel developers care about userland software choices?

You'd get systemDistro

It's real in my mind.

A murderfuck celebration where people would be sacrificed bi-daily by feminists to appease their period gods.
Linus would lead the Linux Terminator Front and would attempt to erradicate these creatures the best he could while remaking git to not allow feminist usage.
The kernel would suffer major restructurations removing whatever code was placed by the feminists.
And the Distro would be made by whoever was still alive therefore making it a cold hard to use yet very streamlined distro where only "Regular" men and women could use it.


TL;DR
There wouldn't be any distro made because factions inside the dev team would constantly fuck each over good.

>Problem: There are 100 linux distros that don't work
>Outcome: There are 101 linux distros that don't work

What is real
Bae don't hurt me
Don't hurt me
No mo

Your gimp skills suck.

there would be a huge fight, then they'd split up to make their own distros

the very concept of "consumer" linuxing is choice, making single distro (this is, set of choices) that would satisfy everyone is impossible

>all the Linux developers teamed up
In other news, the sun is cold, pigs fly, lions lay with lambs, op isn't autistic, Sup Forums is good again.

Thinking too small buddy, what if all corporations WORLDWIDE teamed up to make ONE SINGLE AMAZING PRODUCT. What would happen?


PS: kys retard

It eould be a corporate distro
like Fedora or Ubuntu

The definition of chaos

autism

They would end up making at least one new distro for each developer, probably more.

4u

Already done. Bedrock Linux. Google it. Shit is real.

nothing gets done

We'd get another shitty UNIX knock off that has a million new forks of everything from every one of the other 1000 distros - all of them bugged to hell.

Just use actual UNIX, FreeBSD.

This. Except that last sentence.

Unix is terrible though. That's the whole reason Linux was made.

You'd get a ton of pajeets shitting on the streets and a handful of cucks trying to tell you how it's the definition of freedom.

>falling for the unix meme

>FALLING FOR THE WINBLOWS MEME

just lol gaymers btfo
b t f o
B T F O

>cant handle the truth

Rajesh, 10 points have been deposited to your bing acount

they wouldn't be able to get anything done

Triple the file size
Half the functionality
One quarter the reliability
One fifth the people who can operate it

They would end up with 100 different distros.

Anal idol

trump will make it

There are now 6453 different distributions.

...

kernel developers making a desktop distribution?

that would be like getting a bunch of engineers to make a piece of artwork.

would have to give a bag of chemotherapy with the distro... you get the joke

Err, what?

My phone is x86 and runs Android.

/thread

I want this.

Honestly, it sounds like a great fucking idea.

That distro would be Windows

this

Impossible. I'd never expect cooperation or meaninful contributions from the Archies

Maybe after you learn how to type first

it would have SystemD and Pulseaudio by default because Lennart Poettering is a good boy he dindu nuffin and if you don't like SystemD you are probably a womanizer warmonger, it's 2016, it's acceptable to use SystemD by defaukt with no option to opt out shitlord!

>15 DVD Installation disk set
>30+ different packages each for simple things like editing text files
>Dependencies that link to obscure one off versions with unpatchable bugs
>Installation issues due to SELinux
>4 names for your NIC device
>WiFi never works
>Music files only play via Wine/WinAMP by default
>FireFox has multiple package names
>Screensavers in X may or may not hardlock your system
>Updating requires complete reinstall

They would never reach consensus on what to name things.

It's the thought that counts.

Nothing because nobody 'runs' Linux. There is no clear stated goal to keep all the fuckwits on track.

This is why Linux ALWAYS fails.

Not with that attitude

>Bedrock Linux

So, I can install Ubuntu's Unity?

free out of the box with loadable nonfree kernel modules and uncompiled version usable

Built in portage style compiler

Network based package manager

Stock version is minimal with a few tools only, available in nonfree and free

Cross compatible with any GNU-like enviroment, wether using plan9 and sysvinit or coreutils and systemd

Installer comes in netinstall, with a lot of configuration, minimal, or with your choice of DE

They would never agree on the logo.

...

>Sup Forums is good again
>again
Like it was ever good.
Can we quit this meme?