If you're sick of arch elitists telling you you're not good enough, try this:

it's worse than arch, arch at least is usable to a certain degree where as BSD is just full on autism where basic shit doesn't even work properly

Are you talking about desktop or server usage? I only use BSD for server related stuff.

desktop, who the fuck uses arch on servers?

How does this miss the point? Is the point of Arch to manually input commands?

I do.
But I use the LTS kernel.

It's very stable.

The point of arch is it's installation process? For real? No wonder it's shit.

IMHO who uses Arch on desktops? Fedora (other distros are available) also has the latest/newest versions of whatever you need, also has something like AUR named COPR and if you use the netinst you have pretty much the same as Arch.

What IS the point of Arch?

>What IS the point of Arch?
Bleeding edge packages being the main thing

How big is the difference between the package versions for of example Fedora and Arch?

iDunno