W h y

wiki.gnome.org/GUADEC/2016/BOFs/Diversity

>rage engage

Other urls found in this thread:

igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/11/05/gnome-et-al-rotting-in-threes/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aposematism
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

why though
is microsoft sexist

>equality does not mean equal opportunities but equal outcome instead
welcome to 2016

>find the poisonous she-mysogynists

Organizer: Marina Zhurakhinskaya

>Senior Outreach Specialist focusing on Open Source Community Diversity and Inclusion at Red Hat


"""""""""""""nice job""""""""""""""

>interested in attending
It's just 3 fat women and a cuck.

this seriously annoys the fuck out of me. why is this considered acceptable to give advantages to women while not offering the same to men

in all CS classes ive been in so far the vast majority were men, and surely not because they had better opportunities than the women

shit like this just makes things cancerous at work and in communities

GNOME is literally the worst DE ever, the remove configuration and themes break ever update to protect the "brand identity". Did you know a GNOME dev didn't even know what XFCE was?
igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/11/05/gnome-et-al-rotting-in-threes/

Wait.. GNOME has a community?

I think the main problem with GNOME are the devs. Some of the usability complaints with GNOME3 could be fixed with small changes. One of the major complaints was lack of customisation options in the settings. Fix for this would just be merging gnome-tweak-tool and dconf-editor into the GNOME settings.

Simple shit like this is never getting considered because it apparently is not "the GNOME way"

Other than that it is usable at the moment, if you dont talk about GTK+