He fell for the "mid-range card" meme

>he fell for the "mid-range card" meme

Other urls found in this thread:

gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/deus-ex-mankind-divided-test-gpu
steamcommunity.com/games/337000/announcements/detail/930377969893113169
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

tfw gtx 960

They're mid range as in consoles. Cinematic 30 fps.

Also it's nice to see that the 480 an actual midrange card does nice.

Tfw just bought a brand new RX 470
Gonna get like 40 dps

Welp the eye can only see 30 fps anyways right guys :^)

That looks like a tough game. Lower FPS than Crysis 3/Witcher 3.

Gotta wait to see if that is because it is THAT good looking, or just poorly coded.

Yeah let's not turn down that X16 MSAA

I'll lower quality and play it at 60fps on my laptop, as usual.

These benchmarks are shit because they turn everything to the absolute maximum.

Now try turning tessellation to x8 and watch the RX 480 gain 30+ FPS without any noticeable graphics difference.

>turning on max setting and retarded amount of AA when you can't notice the difference if you tweak the settings a bit lower and get constant 60 fps instead
lyl

I bet it's because of reflections.

i always found it kind of weird how they always put everything to max and judge everything on that

do people actually play games on full max? i don't think i've ever done it

Some people do. It is why they have 1080x2 after all.

Did they leave out the 1060 or am I just blind?

No one does because barely anyone can run that. No one needs every kind of AA turned on. Just AA alone would nearly double this frame rate. They should at least add a bench without all the extra fluff.

>tfw 670

i play most of my games on med with all the fancy shit turned off. can never find benchmarks for med. framerate is far more important to me than graphical fidelity.

I bet it's performs like shit compared to 480 and that's why they excluded it!

this kind of reminds me of all that batman arkham knight stuff from last year.

just turn the goddamn graphic settings down, it ran mostly fine on my comp...

upgrade to the 1060 or 1070 if you ever do.
670 is a great card though

>DX 11

Now post the Direct X 12 benchmarks faggot.

yeah i was looking at 1070s. probs build another computer in a year. 4 yrs is a good long life. don't game too much any more so its pretty low on my list of priorities.

Source? I did a reverse image search and nothing.

DX12 is worse.. lots worse.

gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/deus-ex-mankind-divided-test-gpu

it's worse because those faggots turn on every DX12 exclusive effect which negates the performance improvement DX12 should bring

>480 whoopin 970 ass
Glad I got rid of my 280x though. It'll be interesting to see what effect next month's DX12 patch has

R E T A R D

You'll get high 40s average. I got a 470 too

I've seen some footage. Looks like WatchDoge tier to my untrained eye

Supposedly there wasn't much tessellation in the previous Deus Ex game, so I doubt that there will be much here either, although supposedly there's an in game tessellation slider. Not every game is TW3

Does gamegpu even have one?

September homo

Good thing I'm playing at 1366x768

OP is a faggot. Here's DirectX 12.

Mid range is almost as good as 3 980's. That's just fine, you fucking fuck

50% DX12 boost coming

>it's even worse

Damn...

>GTX 950
>card isn't even on the list

good thing i dont need to play triple goyim gaymes on ultra then!

Out of curiosity, why would you even buy then 950?

>max settings with tons of AA
I bet even the lowest cards on that list can play the game well on medium settings 1920x1080.
The midrange cards can probably all play it at 2560x1440 with high settings. Except for the 3.5GB crippled 970.

gtx 750ti 2GB. Hope i can get stable 30fps on lowest settings.

>A Radeon 7990 beats out an RX 480

Fucking hell.

No Direct X 12 support until September 5th.

steamcommunity.com/games/337000/announcements/detail/930377969893113169

950 cause I realized that I don't really play a lot anymore.

What did they mean by this?

I thought the same, but somehow gamegpu tested DX12

>Fury X beats 980Ti
I'm ok with this

780ti in SLI gets beat by a single RX480!

call me when i need to upgrade from 690 for 1080p

>Only 16% gains from an extra $700+ worth of GPU

PC cucks will defend this.

>Nvidia gave us a boat load of cash to not include Directx12 support at release because that's when all the benchmarks are being made

Fucking kikes.

>a brand new AMD card beat out a 4 year old Nvidia card
AMD WON

>r9 270 is not on the list
>Still enjoy bf4, and other games every day.

The game has Denuvo so it is as if it didn't exist for me for now. No biggie.

>Also once the clean version comes out surely we will see an improvement in performance.

>GTX TITAN
>not even 30fps

f-futureproof, r-r-right g-guise?

The only games I ever fully max out are old games. Most modern games maxed out usually include options that drop framerates a significant amount for minimal visual improvement.

That's one unoptimized piece of shit game.
I bet it also looks like shit.

I play any game that I can get 50ish for minimums at max settings.

A new midrange AMD beat two flagship 2.75 year old Nvidia cards and was in turn beat by a single 3.25 year old halo AMD card.

AMD Cards really seem age well.
So they weren't that bad after all.

PC port was third party, and yeah the art might be decent but the graphics suck

My Titan black getting stomped by 480.
Kek.

you do know 7990 is a dual gpu card right?

I don't either, but I still got a 1070 so that when I do play I don't have to fiddle with settings too much.

so you gonna give it to you wife's son?

It's running the latest TressFX and other physics simulations for cloth. Not to mention the tesselation. Not surprising that framerates are this low with it turned on.

I don't play other people's saved games, user.

980 ti and 1070 owners should be looking at the 1080 results because that's roughly how fast the cards perform after overclocking.

"muh i5 2500k is never obsolete!" fags btfo

Delete this immediately. I am not joking.

> 290X on par with 980
Nice.

>1080 SLI below Fury X crossfire
top kek.

>720p
really makes you think...

That they specifically bottlenecked the CPU and the 2500 gets shit on by a FX-6300 because it has superior multi-threading?

>dat 8350

It begins

unironically playing vidya

Just lol

Does VHQ have a retarded amount of SSAA combined with MSAA or what's the deal here?

Overclock it to 4.5GHz and try again.

Name a single good game that's unplayable(not, not maxed, unplayable) on iGPUs.

>muh overclock

you can say the same about the others ones

It's probably a really shitty port. The E3 gameplay looked very close to Human Revolution.

>just bought 1060
>h-hey, lets check how it does on the benchmarks
>not even on the list

cuck

What a fucking cuckold if ive ever seen one.

Faggot.

You must be retarded. Even nvidiots admit that 1060 is a piece of shit. Just add a bit and get 1070 or if youre AMD fan go get yourself 470/480.

Who wants to bet there is like one or two settings by turning them down a few notches your framerate improves 2x.

>she

just take rx480's fps and add 10

good idea

>tfw paid $440
>tfw 1070 is $640
such is life at the land of jews

Also 480 costs the same as a 1060

[spoiler]1080 is $1040[/spoiler]

>Sandy Bridge slower than Bulldozer
>i3 unusable
>3Ghz Octacore top of the list
Reminder that Intel shills were still doing the old "i3 is fine for gaming" routine until a few months ago.
Reminder that all quadcores will be obsolete in a year or two.

>TFW you bought a 780ti
WHY DIDN'T I WAIT FOR 290X TO COME BACK IN STOCK REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

except part of the whole 2500k meme has to do with its overclock-ability

Don't listen to them, the GTX 1060 is fine. 440$ is a bit too much for it though, what version did you buy?

>380x beats Titan

This game is all over the place.

Got my 6600k to 4.3 Mhz stable without touching the voltage.

>a month ago nvidia shills were happy with the rx480 getting rekt by the gtx 970 by 1-5 fps in their benchmarks of outdated shit
Boy, you just got RADEON'ED

tfw gtx 970, actually

And here I thought my 390 would be good for a while.

Gigabyte G1 gay-men, all others were not in stock, the cheapest (6gb) card runs for about $370.

None are in stock anywhere right now, bought yesterday.

>370 for a fucking 1060
dude, it's supposed to be a 250 dollar card

better than a 980
It's almost at 1070 level
>VHQ
I'm pretty sure it has some super high resolution textures that are just unnecessary for sub-4k resolutions turned on and 16x AA.

i almost fell for the 780ti last year which was at $300

It can't be America everywhere user.

$50 shipping and %18 import tax drives prices pretty high.

I've thrown some prices for reference in my original post (the one with SpongeBob).

Also took a look at the new Titan x, $1500.

Finding a GTX 1060 for less than 280€ is almost impossible now, considering the low amount of stock products, at least here in Europe. I pre-ordered the EVGA GTX 1060 6GB GAMING (non OC) for 289€ (taxes and shipping fees included) some days ago, it was supposed to arrive this evening, but I didn't get any notifier. I strongly hope that they won't make me wait for it forever...alternatively I could get an Asus GTX 1060 Strix OC for 379€, but honestly I don't want to spend too much money for only a minor improvement.