Did some research, is this correct?

Best value:

0-100$ = 750 Ti
100-150$ = 950 (about 50% faster than 750 Ti)
150-200$ = 470 (about 70% faster than 950)
200-250$ = 480 (about 5% faster than 470)
250-300$ = 1060 (about 10% faster than 480)
300-350$ = 1060
350-400$ = 1070 (about 40% faster than 1060)
400-450$ = 1070
450-500$= 1070
500-550$ = 1070
550-600$ = 1070
600$+ = 1080 (about 20% faster than 1070)

I bought an R9 Fury for 270€.

How's that for value for money?

>200-250$ = 480 (about 5% faster than 470)
Should still be 470, no reason to waste more money for 5%

Obviously, I simply inserted the card per price bracket.

In reality the 470 should be top value per dollar overall.

1080 is 25% faster for 40% more money. It's not as bad as you're making out, unless you're broke. Also good luck finding a 1070 for under $430

you're not factoring in the returns over time and purpose of usage

highly dependent on your output display

cost over time

versus

returns on investment

this ain't investment banking nigga

580 can be had for $100 and shits on the 750Ti.

You could probably get dual 780Ti's for $450 which beats the 1070.

Learn to take the used market into consideration. They are often even more value for money.

And I haven't even talked about used 290s and 7970s which can be had for stupid low prices because coin miners. I wouldn't be surprised if the 7970 can be had for as little as $70.

Refer to Logical Increments. Their tier lists are really reliable imo.

should put 980ti somewhere there then.

>Logical Increments
>recommending Corsair PSUs

huuh...

Carey Holzman says that Corsair produces very good quality PSU, I trust that man. Logical Increments also recommends Seasonic PSU btw.

it's a pretty good site, thanks user

Can we see your methodology OP? I am keen to apply your general parametrized to both the previous, and next generation of video cards. Have you published your research yet? Has this been peer reviewed, or are you expecting us to peer review it here. Are there any conflicts of interest in the funding for this research, or acknowledgements or declarations of potential ethical concerns?

I haven't noticed in the OP, but what market segment and audience are we looking at here? I am also confused as to the definition of "value"

Not trying to bring you down here, just being thorough.

>Has this been peer reviewed, or are you expecting us to peer review it here.
He spent years to perfect this data with top engineers around the globe which now culminates in the glorious release to the internet elite: Sup Forums

>Methodology

I googled shit

>Has this been peer reviewed, or are you expecting us to peer review it here

Your mom pee reviewed it

>anno domini
>geforce 7xx series

jesus christ

In Canada I.can find 7970's for 80-85 dollars each used. A crossfire set up of oc'd 7970 is pretty incredible still, especially at 170 dollars price range.

It should also be noted because of the rehashed archeticure up until the 300 series the 7970 should have driver support for an extended time.

Bang for buck or not, this thing is far more than enough for people who
>only have a 1080p monitor
>do not care about VR
>vidya only
I was planning to get a 1070 at first but it was out of stock, so right on the spot I read through some of the reviews of this card and 15 minutes later came back to the shop and bought it.

Amazon literally has 1070s for like 410

>AMD doesn't exist
nice try Nvidia shill

All shit this gen.
Nvidia a shit too this gen but less so.

Basically this gen of cards
is shit

>Best value
*** Best value for proprietary video games
FTFY