>mfw these threads where literally started by mactards to try and circlejerk over their malware proprietary OS >now that they've been co-opted by Sup Forums no one comes to them at all and applefags have gone back to making bait threads
Camden Cooper
The BAOT threads are definitely shit threads, but the other BSD threads are better.
Lucas Brooks
Who gives a shit. I just want a BSD thread that's genuinely about discussing BSD and not just pure and constant shitposting. I wish you linux fucks would just fuck off back to your general, it becomes hard to see posts worth reading when I have to sift through mounds of your shitposts. Fuck off.
Nicholas Nelson
Who the fuck uses OpenMEMEsd? It has no software.
Brayden Russell
No one ever cared about BSD on Sup Forums. Macfags pretended to for a while, but that's over.
Robert Parker
The shitposters care enough to spend hours babysitting threads and throwing out random insults every time someone replies
Joseph Wood
This. BSD has no software, is insecure, and is shit for servers which Linux is god tier in
Noah Bell
I do. Some other people clearly did too but they're slowly leaving to other forums because of you. Now fuck off.
Josiah Stewart
>Actually using obsolete BSD lol hipster
Nathaniel Long
>Me and 2 other trolls baited a few people into trying BSD. fix'd
Joshua Martinez
>being so obsessed with shitting on BSD you can't even wait for someone to make a BSD thread Top kek, you're fucking pathetic.
Blatantly false.
Charles Reed
You think there is some anti-bsd boogeyman on Sup Forums but the fact is that whoever happens to be around at the time that isn't ignorant will bash it.
Kayden Russell
There is. There's one or two shitposters that live for shitting up BSD threads, and then the shittiest tripfag the board has ever seen jumps in here and there.
Mason Kelly
There are, in fact, a handful of dedicated shitposters. You're one of them.
Ayden Diaz
>OpenBSD >no screenfetch It has it, it's just that screenfetch is a Bash script so nobody uses it.
Xavier Ross
Question. As far as I understand there is FreeBSD, and there are two development branches, FreeBSD-STABLE and FreeBSD-CURRENT. The one for end users would be FreeBSD only right? Are there any other branches I should know about?
Samuel Martin
>forums
Nathan Morgan
>end users That's PCBSD.
No one uses FreetardBSD.
Hunter Thompson
>Shichan is not a forum >implying that imageboards are not forums
Back to plebbit friend.
Zachary Carter
>using the Ubuntu of BSDs
Robert King
>calls an imageboard a forum >telling someone else to leave
Back to
Christian Allen
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imageboard >"An imageboard or image board is a type of Internet forum which operates mostly via posting images."
Consider yourself schooled newfag. You might want to YaCy what a forum is by the way. Fag.
Kayden Bailey
Use a release, like 10.3-RELEASE. Don't use CURRENT unless you're developing FreeBSD itself. And if there were some extreme emergency that could only be solved by moving to 10.3-STABLE that would be okay. But that's almost never needed. tl;dr 10.3-RELEASE And don't use PC-BSD, since you can install graphics yourself very easily.
Jose Young
>deletes most posts >doesn't even delete thread what
Grayson Bailey
>open thread a couple hours ago >come back and find 90% of it is deleted post what
Ryan Evans
Based mods took care of things
Hudson Thompson
if they did take care of things, they'd have to delete the shitposting OP too
Colton Richardson
I agree, but it's still better than no shitposts getting deleted. He may not have noticed OP was a shitpost, I know I didn't at first.
Wyatt Baker
What's wrong with ubuntu of BSDs?
Alexander Rodriguez
Why do people say 'enjoy your FBI backdoors' to BSD users?
Jaxson Edwards
An ex OpenBSD dev claimed there are some backdoors in the system. OpenBSD team started auditing and they found a few ""bugs"" which they got rid of as soon as it went public
Blake Lewis
Years ago there was a rumor that OpenBSD has backdoors and a bunch of people that hate the OS started pretending like it was true.
Brandon Wright
if you're implying there was a backdoor, feel free to link the specific CVS version where that was a thing
Jaxson Long
Not even FreeBSD's portsnap vuln has a CVS
Brody Anderson
yes it does
the exploit still exists in -HEAD, so you can go on CVS and see it right away
Brody Foster
hmm, I'll look it up
Nathaniel Rogers
Daily reminder that BSD is an insecure garbage. It doesn't have softwares in its official repos, which makes people use ports. Ports are maintained by a group of basement dwelling neckbeards and software vendors do not audit their compile scripts.
Software vendors provide precompiled binaries for Linux with checksum, but they don't do the same for *BSD.
Furthermore *BSD has a very limited driver support. Even if some device manage to run, the drivers crash due to aggressive mitigation. This is why your laptop turns into a room heater when you run X-org on BSD.
BSD desktop environments are poorly put together. Many desktop environments are developed with Linux in mind. For example Xfce, GNOME, Cinnamon or MATE uses udev for automounting external storage. BSD doesn't have udev: automounting will not work on BSD. I knew this first hand when I tried PC-BSD (a variant of BSD) few years back. Now that GNOME and other DEs are slowly moving to newer technologies like Wayland and Systemd: BSD is and will always remain crippled for desktop use.
Just for the record, I'll let you in some secrets: almost no printer/scanner and bluetooth devices will work on BSD.
Overall my biggest beef against BSD is its philosophy. It claims to be "secure" but its "secure" version has NO softwares. Use ports and it is no longer BSD team's fault that you used "insecure" 3rd party softwares. What a joke!!
Bottomline: 1. Linux fights with Windows in terms of usability while BSD can't even compete with Linux. 2. BSD offers NOTHING practical to be used instead of Linux.
If you are using a free operating system, use one that's usable for desktops. Don't use a router OS (while Linux beats them in routers as well).
Dylan Myers
>Linux software is developed for Linux instead of BSD! Okay.
