>some sequences of 0 and 1 are illegals
Some sequences of 0 and 1 are illegals
Nathaniel Gomez
Camden Foster
>some sequences of 0 and 1 are shitpost
Kayden Thompson
Copyright infringement? Decryption keys? Meh.
We live in an age where you can literally download a gun that you can print out and fire real ammunition.
Of course, you'll be put on a dozen watch lists just for having read that sentence, but it's amazing nonetheless.
Ryan Johnson
then send them back, OP
Caleb Reed
Some sequences of numbers are dubs.
Parker Cox
>some sequences of lolis are illegal in Canada and Australia
Tyler Mitchell
>some sequences of 1s and 0s are photos of 8yo sucking cocks
Austin Wood
>some arrangements of molecules are illegal
Xavier Edwards
>some sequences of 0 and 1 are dank
Austin Richardson
>random number generators are now illegal because they can eventually create cp
Noah Ross
The chances of getting an image that makes sense are very low, and for it to be cp you'd probably have to wait centuries.
Gabriel Brooks
this seems like something an autistic person would complain about. copyright and all this shit has been the case for a long time. well before data stored in digital media.
Connor Nelson
>some sequences of atomic reactions are illegal
man, it's almost as if reducing something to its base elements trivializes what something is really about
Juan Morales
What will happen when we have quantum computers that can generate such images in less than a second?
James Price
jesus, you're right
Brayden Campbell
>not 3d priting the plague
Luis Reed
/thread
Andrew Sullivan
some sequences of 0 and 1 are bad photoshops
Zachary Long
>2030
>can generate literally whatever you want
>porn industry goes bankrupt
Noah Thomas
It's not the same.
Luis Flores
>illegals
kill yourself
Carson Sullivan
>certain accelerations of mass is illegal
Isaac Sullivan
>2016
>internet and adblocker
>all media industries go bankrupt
Robert Rodriguez
Guys I think I'm on to something
>some sequences of 0 and 1 are CP
>pi contains every sequence of number ever
>pi is therefore illegal
y/n
Kevin Sanchez
But we can't prove it does. It's just a speculation. Therefore, pi is innocent until proven guilty :^)
Jayden Edwards
>pi contains every sequence of number ever
I failed math: the post
Evan Wright
big words from anonymous
Justin Williams
Juan Morris
>inserting your penis in a collective group of molecules that has not reached a certain arbitrary age is illegal
Matthew Allen
>moving around some atoms into different spots through a series of electrical impulses is illegal
You can do this with any law, OP. lrn2logic, shazbot
Stop trying to argue in favor of child porn by saying "it's just [...]", and instead, man the fuck up and tell people there's nothing wrong with looking at pictures of children when it doesn't affect them.
>being human is now illegal because they can murder
>having hands is now illegal because they can molest children
Having the potential to commit crime != Committing crime, dumbass.
Why is Sup Forums so fucking legally and technically illiterate? You're all literally sub-reddit tier at this point, yet you still have thirty times the ego.
The law is not about juggling bullshit technicalities. It's about what's moral and what isn't. Even in a court of law; we have juries specifically for this reason.
We're gonna build a firewall. It's gonna be yooj.
Austin Cox
What does that have to do with anything?
Bentley Reyes
Yeah if this were true then data can be encrypted by giving the offset and length of pi for the file
It would then be decrypted by computing pi to the offset+length
Jordan Harris
Porn generating algorithms?
Nathaniel Foster
Then you'd still have to automate the detection of if an image is porn of kids or not, or you'd need a hilariously huge amount of storage space and then sort through a hilariously huge amount of poorly named machine-generated files, autismo.
Also, the argument could be made that what you're doing is making porn of children without real children being involved, therefore it's lolicon.
James Gregory and Gottfried Leibniz's vast pedo scheme has been revealed.
Nathaniel Murphy
I would kill for this.
Brody Kelly
give me a sequence of numbers that is pi to a certain length, and I will give you one that isn't pi of the same length or that length +/-1. For any length. It's an exactly similar argument to the diagonal argument.
It might be easiest for you to think of it this way. Think of pi to a certain number of digits. Now think of that number of digits, except just as repeated 1s. Does that pi to that length that you gave me contain that? No, obviously not. But then you might say, well, we can just go out far enough to where pi does contain that many 1s in sequence. Then I can retort that, well pi to that many digits DOES NOT contain a sequence with as many 1s as digits in THAT pi. Repeat ad infinitum.
The reason for this is that there is no "every sequence of number ever."
There are infinitely many sequences of numbers.
Asher Clark
What if you fed a giant image database into a deep neural network?
If you have a stack of pizza, you can do this today with foss tools. Then you set the model to either generate images or tweak porn according to its learned models.
Nathaniel Wilson
3D printing a shitty gun is pretty unimpressive. Call me when you can print out the ammo.
Liam Cox
>we live in an age
prove it carmen san diego
Brandon Ortiz
>using the smiley with a carat nose
Xavier Lee
What is the shortest sequence of 1 and 0 that is illegal?
Samuel Cook
01101001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100111 01100001 01101100