I wanna see Sup Forums defend privacy rights now

I wanna see Sup Forums defend privacy rights now.

>Title of an ad

You're going to have to produce more evidence senpai.

>Doesn't say if they had a warrant

Shitty thread. No links.

Privacy is not the lack of transparency. They are not mutually exclusive, OP.

Hillary is the type of person who threatens privacy

She's a career politician. She has no privacy rights.
Ordinary citizens are the ones who have that right.

If the NYPD actually produced any documents that will indict Hillary, then I wouldn't even give a fuck.

Everyone has the right to privacy. Privacy does not, however, mean that you can store government documents on your private computer and have them hidden from the public.

That's lack of transparency, because those emails aren't your private emails but government documents.

I can't believe you niggers can't tell the difference between privacy and transparency.

>Everyone has the right to privacy.
Nope. Politicians don't.
It's precisely because transparency can't be guaranteed that privacy must not be allowed for politicians.
You may politely insert a cactus into your anus.

>Nope. Politicians don't.
They do.

>It's precisely because transparency can't be guaranteed that privacy must not be allowed for politicians.
What the fuck are you talking about nigger? Their job is transparent, their personal lives are private.

>get elected member of local school board
>technically a politician now
>suddenly the media has the right to know what type of porn you enjoy

dealwithit.jpg

>not acid washing his hdd and ssd.

Fake and gay

No it comes with the job. If youre a politcian youre private life is gone just like being a famous actor.

If personal lives are private why was trump called out for grabbing pussies

If their private lives were private why does every ad shit fling about their personal lives? Im not even talking about the presidents. I have to hear about kathy mccuntys personal life all the time and im not even from pa

See Because most people are retards that needs to be protected against themselves. Honestly, I think if you reacted to the grabbing pussy comment, and not all the bad policies he proposed before that, you shouldn't be allowed to vote.

But again, this perfectly illustrates the disparity between what people believe (like the people here saying that politicians and celebrities have no right to privacy) and what is actually sane and reasonable. There's a reason why it's referred to as the tyranny of the majority.

People needs to be protected from this kind of delusional bullshit.

Nope.
Politicians should be treated like pedophiles.
They should be stuffed into a "social offender" registry,
people of the neighborhoods should be alerted of the presence of a politician in their midst so they can keep an eye on any and all suspicious activity and suspicious packages that may include bribe money or lobby funds,
and they must be heavily regulated without any right for privacy.

>who is Bill Clinton

>implying the whole "scandal" wasn't a farse orchestrated by his political opponents

If their personal lives are transparent then why do i have to hear about edited trash about trump talking about the miss america contestant who was a porn star and married to a cartel member

Right, police officers going about their business after performing the correct, agreed upon procedure and obtaining a warrant. They are fulfilling their side of the social contract as we should all be expected to. Screening the entire population, opening doors without performing the agreed upon procedure, which is there to protect the citizens, is fascist and a violation of the rights everyone has agreed everyone is entitled to. Why is this hard to understand, the law applies to everyone or it applies to no-one. The government governs by the consent of the people not by whatever Orwellian nightmare they deem is best for it.