>MFW Edge owns every other browser in security.
>MFW SJWFox is the most unsecure.
Tell me /g, why aren't you using the most secure browser ever?
Why are you still using the shitty and unsecure SJWFox?
>MFW Edge owns every other browser in security.
>MFW SJWFox is the most unsecure.
Tell me /g, why aren't you using the most secure browser ever?
Why are you still using the shitty and unsecure SJWFox?
>Windows 10
When I see idiots like you post this, it's more clear than ever that we've been overrun by people who neither care about technology nor have lived through the bullshit that MS has and continues to put the entire computer industry through.
Your cries of freetard and SJWFox ring hollow to those who have experienced the domination of a company which promotes bloated, undocumented, locked-in software which hurts the user more than any political infighting could. The new coat of paint they're putting on with that stupid Nutella fuck and cloud computing won't fix decades of shit after shit. However imperfect Linux is, it will still be miles better than the choice to sell my freedom.
Internet explorer left a bad taste in everybodys mouth. It is what it is
fuck off stallman
>security
>against phishing
I already have common sense 2017 why would i need edge
>Windows 10
who cares?
Chrome Master Race coming through
> safest
> shows adds
Nah its obviously tracking you
>Anyone who values some amount of freedom is Stallman!
Freetards on suicide watch.
>Edge
>secure
>Currently has exploitable zero day that is still NOT FIXED
TOPPEST LELKEK
OP IS A FAGGOT
>"MFW"
>no reaction picture
You're an idiot.
The exploit doesn't affect Edge, retard.
>using proprietary browser
cuck
>using proprietary os
cuck
Stay mad, SJW cuck.
Edge also is made by a company with the most bux to throw to these robust and incorruptible 'journalists'.
Install addblock+ then, damn these amateurs.
Better than a Company run by a bunch of SJW cucks that ruing everything.
I am using Edge
Obviously this post is aimed to people being productive and not for mac hípster or linuxtards living in a baseman.
I use Safari on OSX. It's great.
Meaning that Firefox and Chrome both have noticeably laggier scrolling and worse battery life making Safari the winner by default.
>2 rupees have been deposited in your designated account
why the fuck do you need phishing and SEM attacks blocked? if you can't detect that shit with your fucking eyes you deserve it anyway
>was most secure in terms of blocking socially engineered malware (SEM) and phishing attacks
As far as I'm concerned, these are irrelevant in measuring how secure a browser is. Security is measured in terms of lower numbers of vulnerabilities. If I can open up any web page, and no matter what kind of weird Javascript is on it, it can't break out of the sandbox, the browser is secure.
As for why I am using Firefox, the answer is Tree Style Tabs. Let me know when another free as in freedom browser supports anything close to that.
They don't even mention botnet.
>Tree Style Tabs
>He fell for the meme
Tree Style Tabs
>Edge 38 (thirty eight)
How else am I to manage 25+ tabs?
Safari is the fucking boy on macOS
yet it's been great since 9
ironic that Chrome and FF are now literally IE6 tier while IE has become the exact thing that made everybody flock to FF in the first place lol
Every user says the same until they click on that unblocked viagra add.
>edge browser
>emblybing running a literal malware OS.
>secure
I have common sense so I know I'll never click an ad
With a decent monitor, pleb.
It's actually less secure than both Chrome and Firefox:
docs.google.com
It's baffling how MS makes a brand new "modern" browser that only works on a "modern" OS and it still manages to have IE tier vulnerabilities.
>I have common sense
Dropped.
In absolute numbers it actually had less vulns than FF, but that's probably because nobody uses it so nobody found them yet.
Still way more than Chrome, which is embarrassing for a brand new browser with 2% market share.
I use a laptop, cunt. And even if I had the option of just using a larger monitor, that doesn't scale well for more tabs.
>unblocked viagra add
But user, there are no unblocked ads.
because it has NSA back doors
>FF 48.0.2
>socially engineered malware
Made me smug.
>implying you can scare away with this, the spamming cockroaches
They are kiddos and fanbois.
>common sense 2017
Reading this on 4chin...
>tfw edge and ie share exploits
>implying everybody use ms defender
Grow up. Mentally too.
Apple? Google? Microsoft? SJW is everywhere.
Maybe OP just spread FUD
the lack of webm made me stop using it
>test based on phishing and social engineering
You do understand they are judging security by general stupidity of people.
The battle of internet censorship botnets.
...
[Test sponsored by Microsoft]
>socially engineered malware and phishing attacks
wow it's fucking NOTHING. nobody gives a shit about social engineering and phishing beacuse you have to be an absolute mongoloid to fall for either one of them. What matters are 0-day exploits and RCE, not some pussy ass hand-holding “warning! this is a dangerous website!” shit
OP confirmed for faggot title-reader that doesn't actaully look at the article itself
tfw can't even tell what's memeing and what's not anymore.
>wow it's fucking NOTHING
Damage control is strong in this one.
I'll pass...
Enjoy your aids
i mean ads
slowfari sucks
Because SJW's believe in equal rights for all, and that includes viruses and security exploits.
All must get a turn.
>However imperfect Linux is, it will still be miles better than the choice to sell my freedom.
I was on board with your post until you started spouting that freedom shit. Do you only read open source books that allow you to edit and republish them as you plase?
Everything you said has nothing to do with actual "technology", you hobbyist piece of shit brain dead subhuman.
You typed all that and no one gave a shit.
Neat.
>adds
Its called "ad's" you poo in loo animal.
I'd rather have a browser that was actually secure against malware injection onto my machine than a browser that would accurately warn me about potentially dangerous sites.
>exploitable zero day
Are there anywhere zero days which are not exploitable?
Nobody wants you here stupid rajeesh