US navy Railgun How does it work ? (technical resources )

Hi, i'm studying the US navy Railgun and i was wondering if anyone as an interesting clue about it.

Other urls found in this thread:

dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a134873.pdf
dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a462130.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=fNLrQhn5nLo
youtu.be/NJRDclzi5Vg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

It uses electromagnets to accelerate projectiles. Any other questions?

magnets

Magnets- okay, making magnets, collecting magnets-

>how does a railgun work
Nigger you fucking serious

If you're not retarded you can build one at home

Fuck out of here

monkey boi stfu

dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a134873.pdf

>It uses electromagnets to accelerate projectiles.
>electromagnets

See the mistake?

We quake now?

...

Wrong board, user

If you think you can have a serious technical discussion in /k/ I have a bridge I would like to sell you.

Give it back, Artyom.

Each Zumwalt class destroyer has a level 5 electromaster on board.

>AFAIK it uses the Lorentz force generated by the current flowing in the projectile to accelerate it

Doesn't modern ship to ship combat happen with missiles that hit stuff over the horizon?
I doubt that a projectile that doesn't propel itself could outrange such missile. My common sense tells me that in actual symmetric warfare this thing would be useless.

Railguns are fucking hipster tier.

The Navy fucked themselves when they didn't pick up Uton's (a company that's desperately trying to re-purpose their technology) combustion light gas gun, which achieved similar speeds with significantly less barrel erosion and more mature technology.

But the DoD basically said "MUH CAPACITORZ" and dropped it. Fucking disgusting.

*Utron's, in case you were planning on searching.

dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a462130.pdf

>he doesnt believe in the magic smoke

Have fun with that obsolete tech lel

This is my favourite video now.
youtube.com/watch?v=fNLrQhn5nLo

>lower cost per kill
Damn, someone actually writing satire couldn't write something as poignant as that. If I could find a sentence to describe the US military, that's it.

...

The bullets for this gun must be made of a special strong steel, and only steel. This thing can shoot up any modern rockets and any modern planes. But the lack of it is very high power sypply

youtu.be/NJRDclzi5Vg

Bullets of it can't be made with electronics and navigation inside. But they can be made of thousands small like a coin bullets, that shoot all together.

another good use for it could be space. if and when we get to shoot eachother in the space ofc.

Wouldn't the acceleration be kindof extreme?

The nasa already uses those for testing impact on satellites and ISS modules. They fire a tiny aluminum projectile at 23,000fps (5.56 out of an AR-15 is around 2500fps and that's already fucking fast) They're like a piston pellet rifles but using a powder charge instead of a spring and using compressed hydrogen. Pretty cool

isn't that the point? shoot shit fast?
and you can easily make way longer coils than on earth.

First of all I thought you meant to shoot stuff into space from earth.
Secondly, the forces would work both ways, using a gun to fire heavy objects in space is a really bad idea, it's far better to simply drop them off and use some sort of on board propellant to drive them, that way you don't end up shaking the entire station when firing.

Its like a coil gun but bigger

but the human eyes can only effectively see 29fps anyways

Nice try China

and yet billions have been spent developing them for mounting on military vehicles. Clearly very simple.

kek

They are simple, making them efficient is not.

These really aren't for other ships, they're for shooting down missiles, aircraft, the ISS, and maybe other ships that get too close

>fps
why is this legal