>The WorldWideWeb (W3) is a wide-area hypermedia information retrieval initiative aiming to give universal access to a large universe of documents.
How different it is today...
What went wrong?
How did the web turn from universal access to information to selective access to entertainment?
Other urls found in this thread:
textfiles.com
youtube.com
motherfuckingwebsite.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>Who killed the World Wide Web?
Web 2.0
Yeah, but that by itself shouldn't consume the entire web to such an extent.
Surely personal resistance should have played some part, in that people used to make their own sites all by themselves using just HTML. So why would they over complicate it so much for themselves?
>How did the web turn from universal access to information to selective access to entertainment?
did it though? it may be true for the few hundred popular websites people visit regularly, but does it also apply to the millions of other websites that exist out there?
Netscape (and by extension firefox) did ruin the modern web.
Also mosaic is a meme, nobody was using that shit.
Read history of violawww - it had client side scripting, ajax, css in fucking 1993. It failed because the author wasn't interested in doing a windows port.
Later netscape made a really poor clone of it with which were pretty much stuck to this day.
>he says as he posts on Sup Forums using Google's captcha
Isn't that an argument in favor of OP though?
>Who killed the World Wide Web?
Advertisers and Adobe.
I got you, nigga.
Bout to drop some of dat knowledge on you, OP. This be what you lookin for dawg. High grade info.
(((they)))