...
What is the most interesting engineering/technology related topic you can think of?
Anthony Ward
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
Jack Torres
phones
David Jackson
Spheric cubes
Sebastian Cruz
Nanotechnology
Dylan Rivera
Automation of space probes for mining and processing ores to build more space probes and space ships in orbit
Henry Morales
Virtual Reality
Colton Foster
space bicycles
Michael Carter
loli sex robots
Ethan Young
Levers
Austin Allen
inclined plane
Jose Martin
neural nets
Jaxson Flores
Machine learning
Ryan Hughes
sexbots
Eli Evans
This, faggots.
James Howard
The meaning of life, as computed by a computer.
David Ortiz
cold fusion
and bionic technology
if we can complete these, pretty sure we can build a mecha gundam
Adrian Sullivan
Those wheels are HUEG. Not to mention said wheel would be prone to getting stuck in potholes and you.
You can get better performance by making every wheel on a car independently powered with independent 360 degree steering:
youtu.be
Cold fusion isn't real and there are good reasons to believe it will never be real
Asher Watson
>>>>>>>>>>>>>/Quora/
Levi Thompson
Jeremiah Morales
Gravitational Engineering
Brandon Hall
Main difference between those and spherical tires (besides maglev) is spherical tires can make the car go diagonal without changing the car's angle making it a smoother ride. They're ideally designed for self-driving cars
Lucas Roberts
VR and neural interfaces
Oliver Long
The car in pic related can go diagonal without changing the car's angle. Heck it can trace out 'BENIS' in cursive without changing the car's angle, or trace out the same thing changing it's angle to absolutely whatever.
It's designed to be a self driving car.
Luis Collins
pretty intelligent AI . probably give training in earth facility with raw materials before it is deployed
Ethan Anderson
the wheel
Camden Taylor
Quantum Dildonics
Sebastian Davis
a new type of technology that should replace the current counterparts.
HBM as an example.
Nicholas Brooks
sexbots
Blake Young
I meant like 1:45 of this video \/
>youtu.be
Asher Harris
people in the past believed earth is flat
people in the past believed more mass, more fast to fall
people in the past believed that no more smaller than cell
people in the past believed that we can't reach space
so cold fusion......
your point is?
Luke Carter
Urban planning and housing policy
James Walker
You do fall faster with more mass. Take two objects with the same surface area and volume but diffrent densities and the one with more mass will have a higher terminal velocity.
Robert Ramirez
You're assuming gravity for that to be correct.
Landon Rodriguez
it is correct for any field force
show me where it aint correct
Zachary Walker
Brayden Hill
WTF are you trying to prove? Yes, gravitational acceleration is the same on both objects. However, gravitational force of the objects are not the same. You mentioned 'assuming gravity' yet did not show a system without gravity. I will be pedantic assume the vacuum is imperfect, making the infinitesimal small amount of particles inside provide an equivalent resistive force, thus making the ball fall that amount sooner. However, since the surface areas and volumes of the two are diffrent, this is still not proving a point.