Need to get a LR WiFi Antenna. Just wondering which ones /g uses and/or recommends. I have been rifling through Amazon reviews for the past 2 hours but I can't seem to make a decision. I figured /g would have some insight. Would love to hear your opinions.
FYI, I live 10 min outside of Philly. So there are lots of trees and other stuff that could interfere with one that requires a clear line of sight. Is there anything else I should be wary of when purchasing?
Best Long Range Wifi Antenna
Other urls found in this thread:
stores.ebay.com
engadget.com
youtube.com
gearbest.com
github.com
hyperboria.net
wiki.archlinux.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
You are retarded and you dont understand how wifi works.
Go read a book.
This
/thread bye op
>You are retarded and you dont understand how wifi works.
not op, but why do you think so?
>but why do you think so?
Because he thinks a 'long range' Wi-Fi antenna will work.
The size of an antenna has absolutely nothing to do with transmission distance.
enjoy your cancer
Of course it does. If the antenna was as long as the transmission distance he'd have basically a direct connection :^
>mfw when can't say >using the smiley with a carat nose because there's no goddamn smile
^
I wish wifi had longer range. There are two parks within a mile of where I live and it would be super neat if I could be sitting at the park using my home wireless network.
>increasing the attack surface of an already insecure medium
WOW
...
>it would be super neat if I could be sitting at the park using my home wireless network.
>my home wireless network.
parser: my homeless network
directional dish antenna will get you a few kilometers
I have one of those!
2 x ubiquiti nanostations
I am a networker here but I am unsure on some information here.
Does power and a good antenna not boost weak signals? If wireless is a wave could you not boost the DB of the antenna and not pick up distant signals from how far your range in reaching?
I mean I have seen 2km boosters so you could pick up about 600 meters of wireless signals - solid objects (thus why 2km is never true in real life).
Explain a little more so I am set straight
what does?
Power + antenna.
The higher you push energy through your antenna the longer the range.
However, the clean signal determines on how easy it is for signals to be generated and pushed. So distance is power and usable signal is the type of antenna design.
>The size of an antenna has absolutely nothing to do with transmission distance.
pretty sure a big ass parabolic antenna would help smartass
engadget.com
build one.
What the actual fuck are you planning sir?
Yaggi.
Yes yagi antenne works well
I have the Yagi antenna pic related and it's shit. Bought this one and damn it gets 3x more wifis. But is from China maybe you find it from your country. It's has Ralink chipset and works on Linux out of the box. It also supports monitor mode.
gearbest.com
...
well if you don't have line of sight then you are shit outta luck.
You might try a circularly polarizad antenna as that tends to punch through vegetation better
The reason why people are calling you stupid (I hope they actually understand why and are not just circlejerking)
Is because you better have some good aim. You're going to pick up a lot more than just the AP you want, even with a directional antenna. That means you might get a good signal, but your speeds might be complete trash. If there aren't that many APs in your area, you can try this out. Not only that, but the amount of cable loss you're going to get at 2.4ghz with a jumper you can actually aim with... not even worth the money.
...
however.. if it is your own network you're trying to connect to, get a pair of nanostations and call it a day.
...
i have a chinese yagi and is ok,
but yours i think is better,
also take in cound the wats of the card
remember to put atleast 2m from where you are and if posible on top.
Is war driving with that stuff even a thing anymore? Not even sure WEP is able to be enabled in most modern routers. I've only ever seen dudes with GPS trackers and small antennas connected to raspberry PIs for location logging.
you can just use your phone now, alot easier
A directional antenna could help though.
? Not OP, but you guys are stupid.
He never said anything about antenna size. He just want to increase the distance with which he can pick up wireless signals.
>The size of an antenna has absolutely nothing to do with transmission distance.
No, but a directional antenna will increase the distance in one direction and decreases in the other.
>At longer distances LoS will be your biggest obstacle. Other than that there isn't much you should worry about.
>Coax leaks 2.4 GHz, so try to minimize coax usage.
>Instead of buying one, make a cantenna. Fun diy project.
>you can just use your phone now, alot easier
the point of war driving was cp
best not to do that on your phone
>the point of war driving was cp
Oh was it, you fucking pedophile?
wardriving is just logging the ssid / security / gps you tool
your phone does not connect to the ap
...
...
How bad is it if I'm off by a millimeter for every measurement? My hands and tools are rather imprecise. Should I bother trying to build one?
Where do you think you are?
>
>The size of an antenna has absolutely nothing to do with transmission distance.
This is true i have foot long yagi that outperform those yardstick size ones.
comfy looking setup
Pretty bad.
That being said, I made one using measurements converted to inch/16ths, and some elements did not align well.
But element length is most important, and element width, just use 14ga copper wire
That's because they're chink made garbage and constructed badly. The parasitic elements are all spaced wrong for the wavelength they need to operate at. Size does matter in that a Yagi will more elements will have better gain thus longer range but a much narrower beam width making it harder to tune.
>What the actual fuck are you planning sir?
I'm guessing he's a part of the Philly MeshNet Initiative
Links to software for mesh-networking
github.com
hyperboria.net
wiki.archlinux.org
>WEP
Haven't you heard of the Pixiewps exploit? Comcast still hasn't patch all of their routers.
>No, but a directional antenna will increase the distance in one direction and decreases in the other.
Using directional antennas for web browsing is equally retarded and is clearly not what the OP was talking about you stupid faggot. Stop trying to play with semantics to win a pointless argument.
>yea but if you change the shape and function!
Which has nothing to do with size jackass
It won't make a huge difference but it will affect gain. Yagi's are rather difficult to build anyway. Unless you really need the long range go for a biquad or cantenna instead. There simpler to construct and still perform very well, better than any shit of ebay. I made mine pretty half-assed but it still works very well.
This guy has tonnes of videos on how to build various antennas with household items. You just need to source the connectors and possibly copper wire.
youtube.com
If you don't want to make it yourself then you can just buy one ready made.
Yes, a GOOD antenna does help with signal clarity, but neither a LARGE nor a GOOD antenna will help with signal range.
The range of the signal will always be determined by a variety of factors including amplitude, frequency, interference, signal noise, etc.
You would get more range from increasing your TX power than you would with some massive meme antenna from amazon, but you'd still have a shitty signal because of noise.
Get your head out of your ass, where did I even imply OP will use it to browse?
I have no idea what OP is planning to do with it, but I'm still correct with what I said.
And grass is green.
And the sky is blue.
And 2 + 2 = 4
All of which is completely irrelevant because that is not what the OP asked for you moron.
So doing some math here.
If you get a 2000mw capable wireless adapter, and force it to output the full 2 watts.
Then couple that to a 23dbd yagi... With the shortest cable for no line loss...
That's 650 watts of dirrectional EIRP.
The average home router is omni directional and about 4 watts of EIRP...
Am I going in the right direction with this? Or is there a law of diminishing returns somewhere? The fcc limits are 152w ERP, which is still pretty decent.
The right direction to get an FCC van through your wall, sure.
As long as it doesn't affect anyone else, it's probably fine.
Plus they will just see a consumer USB radio, and a consumer antenna, and give you a slap on the wrist and a don't do it again.
Regardless, that's how it works right? Clearer signal, higher throughput?