Linux isn't even object-oriented

>Linux isn't even object-oriented

Other urls found in this thread:

eli.thegreenplace.net/2009/04/27/using-goto-for-error-handling-in-c
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

What the fuck operating system is?

Moron. You don't even know what object oriented is.

That doesn't make any sense
>female
Oh I see what's gone wrong here

This post is proof that women have no place in programming.

>Object oriented is good
You are literally the hipster of the computing world.

What did OPmean by this?

>implying object oriented is good

Make sure you explain the entire industry they've been doing things wrong for the past couple of decades then, fucktard.

Thing is, industry is not about good software
But good ways to get sellable software done by least skilled workers
Which is where OOP shines, not actual software quality.

B-but I was told capitalism rewards excellence!

it does if you are anywhere errors are really fatal.
Military and Medicine are somewhat sane, but they don't have huge teams working no software in the enterprise-OOP way (usually) but a few very skilled people working on it.

Lmao

dude i spent years working 60 hour weeks to code some tiny bit of functionality is some giant ancient program like photoshop or word. my life's work is rewarded by my name flashing in the first time run splash screen for .1 seconds or in 2 pt font size

> Be me
> Cobol programmer
> See code from 89
> GO TO everywhere
> See code from 2016
> still using GO TO
> 2016
> soon 2017

wtf I hate objects now.

goto has its reasons.
Error handling can be way more readable with proper use of goto.
But it does have quite a few shit ways to use it aswell.

Stupid fuck, the industry is wrong.

There is no fucking reason to use go to's, period.
Don't be like my colleagues who try to tell me that I cannot program without the use of go to.
My latest project uses 0 go to's.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahha
>Military software good
>Battle management software user friendly
I'll have you know these pros mighty know what's important according to the book, but usability in the field so nowhere near the usability of standard commerical products.

none of my projects have ever used gotos

Not OP, but the Windows kernel kinda is, in a way.

>goto is for dinosaurs

assembly and c/c++ still use goto since it's the most efficient way to execute certain blocks. ever tried efficient error handling with no code duplication?
>NEET spotted

Error handling is the only time I've used them, and it was a very concise and neat solution.

Just because they aren't required doesn't mean that they can be useful in a handful of contexts.

eli.thegreenplace.net/2009/04/27/using-goto-for-error-handling-in-c

>not laughing at the good joke bait thread

Objectifying things -- especially women -- is bad. You should be happy that Linux is such a progressive and forward-thinking distro.

preach it baby

It was posted by a man though.
You can post reaction images of the opposite gender yknow

Front row second from the right has hueg hips, even accounting for sslightly fatness

Basically no good software is object oriented.

All good software is written in Haskell. Prove me wrong.

Rust exists.

...

Windows and Singularity (and other MSR OS's), macOS/OSX, iOS, and NeXTSTEP, BeOS and Haiku, Genera, Bluebottle OS. Shit, dude, the only OS's that AREN'T object-oriented today are *nix and BSD.

Don't get butthurt when you hear the word "object-oriented". It's a very useful paradigm for dealing with layers of small stateful components which, big surprise, describes operating systems very well.

Any decent, modern programming language will let you raise an exception or return from a method.

Good software can be written in any language.

those are some homely bitches

Listen, Linux is the most object oriented OS I know, and I know a lot of OS's, that I can tell you. I have many friends, you know, that use Windows and Mac OS and they all tell me my OS is the most object oriented.

Would cuddle with and fuck the one on the far left. Would marry if she isn't a bitch of a person.

>be pajeet
>poo out of the loo
>go on windows 10
>program in java
>make pajeet tutorial
>BOOOTABUL USB DRIVE
>hear about this GNU/Linux
>install it with pajeet magic
>it isn't object-oriented
>complain on Sup Forums

are you a fish?

simply epic.

>Any decent, modern programming language will let you raise an exception or return from a method.
Haskell will happily let you do that.

Technically. Stylistically it is.

Only morons think goto is bad.

The common consensus is that goto is bad. If you didn't know that, I feel bad for you.

>let's follow the common consensus about gotos but not about object orientation
Sup Forums, everyone.

what has happened to my favourite distro

>he doesn't have a 100% file based os

Define "file".

>no builtin support for OOP = not OOP
Protip: C allows polymorphism, you just have to code your own vtable. Also, void* is a thing.

its not like retards think like a woman

it's that women think like retards