>>57977580

[Jeremiah Hall]

You better call that number op, I think google might be compromised.

[Noah Moore]

>exploit
>requires direct access to filesystem to execute
Wow, it's fucking nothing

Linux shills at full force today

[Brody Hall]

In their defence this doesn't happen on Linux desktops because nobody really uses them.

[Hunter Phillips]

So, you'd rather have an unpatchable system vulnerability and not know if it ever really got patched because you're using a proprietary operating system? Doesn't seem like a secure OS to me.

[Liam Evans]

>unpatchable system vulnerability
Hey Linux foundation! You have unpatchable system vulnerability I can delete /etc/shadow and gain access to root acount! PATCH THIS RIGHT NOWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Brayden Allen]

You're just jealous that Richard Stallman personally pays me to shill for Linux on Sup Forums

[Kevin Smith]

I'd rather have 5 million lines of code nobody reviews except for people with intentions of harm and have a heartbleed bug.

[Mason Diaz]

You're a retard, just be quiet.

[Aiden Howard]

owasp.org/index.php/Heartbleed_Bug
>Below is the revised code from Github:
hbtype = *p++; n2s(p, payload); if (1 + 2 + payload + 16 > s->s3->rrec.length) return 0; /* silently discard per RFC 6520 sec. 4 */ pl = p;
cyberciti.biz/faq/understanding-etcshadow-file/
yourownlinux.com/2015/08/etc-shadow-file-format-in-linux-explained.html?m=1

[Brayden Hughes]

Ad hominem are surely going to make Microsoft patch system vulnerabilities.