Should I just stop waiting for it and get a 1080?
Should I just stop waiting for it and get a 1080?
Other urls found in this thread:
amazon.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
wait for Vega
unless your performance is complete ass in games you want to play and need something now, just wait for whatever, 1080 ti, vega, that shit.
but I thought the ti doesn't exist, I don't wanna waste my time waiting for something that doesn't exist.
There's going to be a 1080ti. It will be just about as powerful as the titan while costing a whole lot less. Is it worth it to wait when the 1080 is better performance per dollar? How much are you willing to spend on the ti brand? If your pc sucks dick and games are unplayable get a 1080 now. Just make sure you at least have a 1440p monitor with at least 100hz refresh rate. Otherwise just get an rx480
You better not have a shitty monitor
nvidia is holding it off as a response card to vega. if amd plays their cards right, nvidia will be forced to bring their prices back down closer to 900 series prices.
Don't be a waitcuck. Get a 1080 and a 1440p 144hz monitor.
>AMD
I'm getting this badboy so I think I'll need that ti, problem is I'm impatient as fuck.
amazon.com
>Not waiting for something that might be better and cheaper
>AMD
>Better
thank you for not being retarded
if you are impatient then just get a 1080 now. I saw one on amazon for $580. within a year of the 1080ti coming out the 1180 will be out with better performance while costing less, but it wont have the ti logo
Fact: vega is going to be better than the XP at $400
you mean wait for Vega to bring the price down on Nvidia cards? gotcha
>37fps
>not even highest settings
>doom
Yeah when Titan x 4.0 come you amd shill. AMD always fucking late to the game. Kys
The 1080 took over the price point of the 980ti. I don't really see a market for 1080ti.
Nvidia is such a pussyfest.
>Dont want to give information on the 1080TI
>Worried about AMD
Come on niggers, Stop acting like nvidia is god.
We literally had to tie our hands behind our back to not hurt your fee-fee.s.
>nvidia ever showing engeneering smples and instead showing fake cardboard mockups
2017 your market share is ours and your overpriced cards will be worthless. keep crying :^)
>WE
>w-we were holding back
You sound upset dudester
I'm enjoying my 1080 while you Waitâ„¢
third party impartial, 980 owner here. Just wanted to let you know nvidia is a monopoly the 1080 and 1070 prices were the last straw. As if the 970 lies and g-sync wasn't enough. Nvidia is a paper tiger and a bad company. I'm going to vega, shill and there is nothing you can do about it.
>muh 3.5
>being this butthurt
That's what you get for buying a poorfag card.
Nobody is stopping you from buying inferior product.
same here user except i bought the meme70
I have a 980. You clearly are shaking so badly you can't read now, shill. lol pathetic
and you're about to buy a vega which is already inferior
good for you
>huge demand
>insufficient supply
>prices rise
are you actually retarded? a 1080 goes for $580 on amazon these days which is damn near the price of the 980, which also sucks. even though the 970 had 3.5gb usable vram it was still an awesome card for people with a 1080p 60hz monitor. it was by no stretch of the imagination a 1440p card
I guess I answered my question, retard. you should probably just kill yourself before you encounter some more elementary economic principles
Nothing you posted adequately addressed more than a 1/5th of my grievances and was mostly pedantic pseudointellectualism . Try again nvidia employee. 8^)
Can someone recommend me a Motherboard with the i7 slot, DDR3 ram slots and still being able to put a GTX1070?
So far I have seen DDR4 ram only
>can afford $900 in upgrades after a 1TB 960 pro
>1080 seems pointless
>no 1080Ti
>tax refund in a few months will only add to the pile of disposable capital
I guess I'll upgrade to an IPS 144Hz panel?
When are we going to get discounts?
Any offers soon?
I want to buy a GTX1080 Windforce but im holding till I see a good deal
>IPS 144Hz panel
They expensive as fuck user
>DDR3
Asus Z170M-E D3
I dont want to buy again 16gb of ram
16gb of Ram is the minimmum required now
if you cannot into basic economics that I learned in high school then there is no saving you
>nvidia is a monopoly
statement doesn't make sense, it should read 'nvidia has a monopoly over the gpu market' which is false, as amd and intel make gpus. it isn't really nvidia's fault that amd's cards aren't as good as theirs and that intel doesn't make discrete graphics cards
>970 lies
pretty dumb but it was still a good card
>1080 and 1070 prices
literally supply and demand. if you can't understand this then just drive into a concrete barrier at 100mph
>gsync
gsync is great. no tearing, no input lag, no additional gpu workload. nvidia has the right to charge for technology and products they developed. literally every company does this
there are people who actually think companies pay people to post in this shit hole. go ahead and do what you please with your discretionary income
thanks bro, looking at it
>buying Intel
>supporting Feminist Frequency
>buying amd
>supporting islamic state
Still better than supporting feminists.
>statement doesn't make sense, it should read 'nvidia has a monopoly over the gpu market' which is false, as amd and intel make gpus. it isn't really nvidia's fault that amd's cards aren't as good as theirs and that intel doesn't make discrete graphics cards
you are resorting to attacking my lingual specificity. not an argukment
>pretty dumb but it was still a good card
non argument
>literally supply and demand. if you can't understand this then just drive into a concrete barrier at 100mph
only attempt at an argument you made but it is unspecific and undetailed, has no actual cost analysis from nvidias end.
>gsync is great. no tearing, no input lag, no additional gpu workload. nvidia has the right to charge for technology and products they developed. literally every company does this
g-sync has caused bloat in the monitor market with never dropping prices and the nned for a $150 module. freesync does 90%+ of what g-sync does at near zero cost.
thanks for your time tho :^0
t.muhhAMD
You do know that you have to be 18 to view Sup Forums, right?
t. mad mudslime
In law, a monopoly is a business entity that has significant market power, that is, the power to charge overly high prices.
anyone_?
hey do you wanna be my sugar daddy??? ;3
>vega at 4k full everything, 8x aa even
>70 fps
top keke 1080 owners on suicide watch.
>full everything
>ultra
pick one
why not wait?
the ti this round is significantly cut titan, not slightly like last time, it should be halfway between 1080 and titan.
I really hope amd is just waiting for the 1080ti to happen, so they can push big vega right after, kinf of a reverse of what happened with 980ti and fury.
vega looks like it could either be a new core architecture, or they implemented what made maxwell so efficient.
if its new core, look at the 4870 and how it crushed nvidia at a VASTLY cheaper price, and then the 5000 that refined it and was still cheaper. then the 7000 line that again beat nvidia's at the time and went toe to toe with the next lineup till the 780ti, and over time still came out on top in many cases.
amd has a VERY good track record with new architectures on the gpu front.
so many of nvidia's practices year over year, cululateing in the need to use vista for a feature I wanted was my last straw. amd thankfully has and likely always will remain a very viable option, sometimes the best, sometimes the best for price.
not his fault everything is labeled so fucking stupid from game to game.
you are pointless. we can't get everything we want exactly how we want them. gsync cost money to develop and nvidia will charge you if you want to use it. freesync is inferior and still costs money. the answer to why nvidia's new generation of cards cost so much initially is literally just supply and demand. I agreed that the 970 turned into a clusterfuck. if nvidia is a monopoly it isn't due to them buying out the competition, which is illegal. its because no one has been able to compete with them
I hope vega is competitive with nvidia on the high end but I am doubtfull. I'll just have to wait and see
thanks for input
4000 died after 3 years of driver support
5000 and 6000 died last year, but only officially. driver support really died after 3 years.
7000 series, gcn 1.0, they disabled async compute last month.
never buy amd if you want longevity.
...
>never buy amd if you want longevity.
Biggest lie ever. People are running HD cards that have aged well, the gap between 1060 and RX 480 has closed, and people are still rock 390x cards and the like for years. Even the FX-8xxx trumps the i3 in multitasking, which matters if you're gayman alongside having 20+ tabs, playing music, and shitposting.
AMD cards are more practical. Nvidia cards are only good until the next series starts to launch.
If there was a bug, I want to know the performance before and after, seeing as it took what, a month or so before someone noticed anything, I find it hard to believe that async added anything to gcn 1, I have a gcn1 and would rather the game not crash/take system with it if the gain to performance is next to nothing.
still wish they would tell us more... at least its better then the heaven benchmark and nvidia where they made old cards worse, for no reason, removed all threads of it ever happening, and moved on like nothing happened.
>thanks for input
Pleasure.
So without shitposting can someone give me the pros/cons of Nvidia/AMD?
I still find it hilarious so many 7970/280x owners shilled async so hard only for it to be taken away effortlessly by amd.
is this shitty monitor thing the new Sup Forums meme?
it's already old.
>i7 slot
sheez I couldnt remember the name in the spot user
People get triggered by expensive GPUs with 1080p monitors.
fags get mad when people buy shit gpu's and have low fps
fags get mad when people buy fast gpu's and get high fps
fags never win.
I unironically get triggered by that. It is a waste of money.
>muh downscaling
1440p looks way better on a 1440p monitor. It looks slightly better than 1080p on a 1080p monitor
I had a 980ti with my old faithful 1080p monitor I got in high school for my xbox 360. That card tore the fuck out of that monitor so I got a predator x34. Don't think I'll need another monitor for 5-7 years or so
Why do you care how strangers spend their money?
>fags get mad when people buy fast gpu's and get high fps
Try not to get mad when the owner of a really shit tier 60 Hz monitor tells you he's getting 200+ FPS, so obviously he shits all over the plebs getting pathetic ~100 FPS.
What is even the point of spending a year's worth of allowance on a GPU when you're still on the office grade TN panel you got used on letgo?
I wish they would compliment their nice gpu with a nice monitor. Why not get a nice 1440p monitor to go along with your 1070?
this guy understands my crippling autism
>allowance
gotta be 18 to post here
Congratulations, your asperger's is way worse than mine.
you replied so yours is worse
i care so much less than you do about what other people do with their gpu's and monitors, it humors me that you guys are autistic as fuck.
what's the opposite of autism? cause that's what i've got.
>not owning a 1080 and rx480 while waiting for vega as well
i probably need to have less computers desu
it's ok i have 6 right now. fun hobby that keeps me out of trouble.
AMD fans where saying wait for Vega the day Polaris got released..
Should screencap this because when and gets trashed you always come back saying it's expectations that where wrong
will a 1070 be in anyway an upgrade from my 780? or are they aboit equal?
Big upgrade, especially at 1440p and beyond.
Still want to know more on the bug, and what performance was with and without, but mocking nvidia because they don't have it period is still a reasonable thing.
its only 300 higher. so yeah its a decent upgrade
well lets see here, a 780ti preforms around a 960 when nvidias ass isnt held to the fire to make the drivers better
a 960 is garbage
a 970 is substantially better
a 980 is substantially better then a 970
a 980 ti is a fuck load better then a 980
and a 1070 beats out a 980ti
that said, if you are on a 780ti you can wait a few months for price drops on nvidia hardware, or chose vega.
What's wrong with GSYNC?
literally nothing. he's just buttmad that the 980 sucks and is too poor to have a gsync monitor. things cost money. nice things cost more money
this video was very helpful in explaining what it does (kills tearing) and doesn't do (add input lag)
>base vega = oc 1080
At the very least you should wait for Ti. Unless you love getting cucked that much.
...
I got a 1070 to go with the 4K monitor I ordered. I have enough money to've sprung for a 1080 though. Would that have been more worth it, even if I'm not really big on gaming?
If so, what are the chances of cancelling my Amazon order if they haven't shipped but I've been billed?
>to've
>sentient fruit
>christianity
please, for everyone's sake, just kys
just get another 1070 later on and play in 1440p in games that can't 4k60.
I've got 9 in total here and a couple old laptops in storage
I work from home developing on both windows and mac so I couldn't really avoid having a collection
Been thinking about building a pretty ballsy (dual xeons or some shit) workstation and consolidating most of my stuff into VMs - easy to spawn and trash windows instances for testing and shit as needed but I can host it all from linux so i can play around developing for that too (and keep all the non-work shit like web browsing on there)
>1070 beats a 980 Ti
Topkek.
Lolwhat
Fine wine is what makes AMD cards become more appealing over time, as opposed to the immediate stagnation of nvidia drivers
>Fine wine
literally kill yourself poojeet
>not a shred of intelligent response in sight
What a beautiful day for you to be as inane as ever.
this picture makes me sad on what they are doing to her when she isnt the one enabling the meta and being the scapegoat
it is mate, OC a 1070 and it will edge ahead of a 980ti that is also overclocked
>tears of a 980ti owner are showing
>There's going to be a 1080ti. It will be just about as powerful as the titan while costing a whole lot less
Wishful thinking. Why would nvidia want to cannibalise sales of both the 1080 and Titan X? They are the two most powerful cards on the market right now.
>but Vega
I'll believe that when I see it. Please prove me wrong AMD, your top-end cards have been so outclassed by nvidia for so many years.
*If* they release a 1080 Ti it will come immediately before Volta as a way of selling off their stock of GP102 chips that didn't make the grade for the Titan X. Expect it to be closer to $1200 than $600.
>IPS 144Hz
If you're buying it for games that will actually benefit from 144Hz (i.e. FPS) get a TN. No point getting a blistering frame rate and torpedoing it with shitty input lag and response time.
>but muh colors/viewing angles
This is what is known as a compromise.