>>58599846

>2 cores
Discarded.

Other urls found in this thread:

cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=2925&cmp[]=804
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>le dual-core Pendiumb is as fast as a high-end Core i7 when you oberglog it meme

Just put $100 more dollars into the fucking budget and buy a better processor.

I swear to god you poorfags suck at money.

2 cores 4 threads

pretty much makes all i3-s worth jack shit.

...

>tfw a 6 year old processor still can't be beat

I regret giving Intel money, this monopoly is awful

I regret falling for the FX8350 is good meme, should have gotten a 2500K and the only thing I would have need to upgrade since 2011 would have been the GPU.

I hate the monopoly, but Intel's not to blame really.
Now what was that one company that decided to make ovens instead of good CPUs..? If Intel can get away with shit like Coffee Lake it's AMD's fault for not giving a good alternative.

>what is a feminine penis
stop dont give in save your heterosexuality

You very well know AMD got bullied to death after Athlon managed to overtake them

AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT.

Should I, Sup Forums?
I run it stock because shit motherboard cant overclock, and said shit motherboard is locked to 4gb DDR2 ram.

I'm building a cheap ass PC and I'll probably get this CPU unless AMD can offer something with even better price/performance ratio but I don't count on it.

8350 didn't exist in 2011.

>I swear to god you poorfags suck at money.

I just have other hobbies. PC is basically an appliance to me so low end, cheap parts are absolutely fine.

>he uses bing
Oh user....

;[

>Pentium
look who's living in the 90s

Bentium.

ebin xDDDDDDD

bendium le ebin meymey XDDDDDDDD

...

I would bet they will. Zen 4c/8t parts will be failed 8c/16t parts, and if we're really lucky there may even be 4c parts without multithreading that will sell for peanuts because they're literally silicon AMD would have to scrap otherwise.

...

...

Explain this then:

cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=2925&cmp[]=804

>Pentium G4560 - 5094
>i5 2500k - 6448

...

>not overclockable

fuck it

It's a dumb meme. The only thing the Pentium matches, and MAYBE occasionally bests, the 2500k at is gaming.

It's a fine choice for a cheapo gaming machine, as it won't likely bottleneck even a midrange card like a 1060 or 480.

Sup Forums ruined spurdo, and is really late to it too.

gondola was never supposed to speak in spurdo slang and was never supposed to leave ylilauta, and you faggots took him out of context and ruined him too

Why have you not joined the Intel master race, Sup Forums?

Still waiting for the Rypoo meme?

>tfw still have a Nehalem i7 950
>tfw probably will never change since it just werks

Feminine penises aren't gay.

>tfw 2600k at 4.3 ghz

Wait for ryzen pricing before you buy.

Gonna put together a home server soon. Pentium should be sufficient

>be a Linux guy with an early pentium in the '90's
>get made fun of by the sun/hp guys for having the FDIV bug.
>get revenge when the PPRO's came out.

I still laugh.

It's all about the Pentiums!!

But the point is that, 100 more dollars won't get you any more performance

You should, fuck AMD.

>tfw 3470 aka rebranded 2500

witnessed

either that or they could do what they did with the tri core processors and lop off the two cores from the 8c16t proceesor for the 6c12t ones

...

If you got a quad core even back from core 2 days, you would be good even today, why would you get ANOTHER dual core part when a quad core can last the life of the hardware if its used 24/7?

literally intel crushing competition making sure they had no good r&d budgets, along with amd having one of the worst ceos to ever ceo.

>newfags not knowing about the tab tradition

>no turboboost

wait on ryzen, you have at most 5 weeks till its out and make a decision based on that.

Personally, even if it costs more im going 8 core because look how fucking long dual core lasted for, the look how long dual 4 thread lasted for, by my luck the motherboard on the 8 core will die, i get a new one, and still let it die again before anything requires more processing power.

it will in multi thread games, and any time the cpu is the bottleneck it makes gaming painful, opposed to when the gpu is the bottleneck.

>amd
>ever

test

t. intel shill getting desperate

chicked

agree
seems like never feeling safe for your choice with amd
Intel on the other hand, does make you look stupid paying the extra

Whether you believe it or not, there's a decent amount of modern games that are optimized for quad-cores.

You made me curious enough to do the UserBenchmark thing with my overclocked i3.

It won't cost less than an i3 then retard.

>$64

wake me up when you can actually buy it at that price

Does this actually give a good measure of where your chip is on the silicon lottery?

I'm guessing that 99.99% of the people who benchmarked it didn't overclock it, given that it's an i3 and all.

I have a 6600k I probably won't get around to oc'ing kek. Fucking first time builder falling for memes.

>won't get around to overclocking
what?

It would take less than an hour to dial in a moderate overclock. Fuck, I can help if you want. Sure it would take ages of fiddling to get every single MHz out of it, but you could get it to 4.2 or 4.4 in a few clicks.

how do you overclock anyway, you gotta fuck with the timing crystal or something>?

Worst part is I have the evo 212 hsf.
But that's likely what I'll do, I just heard with an oc it's better to do it manually than a bios auto i guess

You go into the BIOS and raise the multiplier. You have a baseclock of 100MHz, so to get 4.4GHz you set a 44x multiplier.

A 212 should get it to 4.2 easy, maybe 4.4 (depends on your specific chip, case temperature, etc). Just test it with a stress program like Prime95 and benchmark it with Cinebench.

Thanks, will give it a shot later. I shouldn't have to fuck with any voltages right? That's above and beyond anything I want to do

If it doesn't work move it to 1.35v but don't touch it otherwise (Skylake will happily take higher voltages but your cooling sucks)

um... yea... the guy who has lead teams that created cpus that kicked intel's ass, and co author of 64bit as we know it makes his first bad cpu, or he laid the groundwork to catch up and in future iterations surpass intel. I wonder which one is more likely.

as for safe or bad, amd was a solid choice up through sandybridge as an alternative that was worthwhile, and up through haswell if you had a multithread need on consumer parts.

Not to mention on laptops, amd was the better choice if you got something without an actual gpu... but then I see laptops as toys and if you do something on one that needs real horsepower, you done fucked up getting a laptop when you wanted a workstation.

ьentium

Flash your mobo with the Kaby Lake update and enable XMP. By default the Enhanced Turbo is enabled as well, which allows all cores to hit the highest single core boost

will win 7 work on it? what's the last line that has proper win 7 support?

Haswell

Bro that's exactly what I'm saying. It's called binning. A lot of 3/4 core phenom ii parts just had an imperfect core disabled and if you were lucky they could be re-enabled just fine.

If you were REALLY lucky you might have even got a 3/6 core part that only had the core(s) disable to meet demand.

I don't think it was until the fx series they started physically cutting cores, and they may very well have just been on the edge of the wafer.
Fun fact: wafers are usually round in shape but clever cooperation between the arch designer and fab company can lead to these edge pieces being salvaged as cut cores.

Zen chips are all fabbed as 8 cores and it'll be up to chance how far they can bin defective dies to increase yields, and up to AMD just how much they want to test each individual die to see which ones are semi-salvageable.

>2 (-two-) cores
TY BASED JEWS


Not upgrading until there's a processor that blows my 2500k out of the water for a reasonable price. Or I'm "forced" to.