DELET THIS

DELET THIS

Other urls found in this thread:

valid.x86.fr/bench/rjmzdu/1
valid.x86.fr/bench/1
youtube.com/watch?v=2Fy87gUVisQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

>lower values are better values
Nice one AMD person you can't fool my indian eyes

DELET THIS NOW

>synthetic benchmarks

AMD wins again

FUCK YOU, GOY
STOP POSTING FAKE BENCHMARKS, FILTHY GOYIM

Synthetic benchmarks worked just fine when intel was winning

Intel loves synthetics.

There's no escape now, kike.

IT'S HAPPENING

DELET THIS GOY!

SHUT IT DOWN!

BUT MUH GAMES MUH GAMES MUH GAMES

JUST FUCK MY 7700K UP SENPAI

anyone want to buy my 7700k?

>1 IP address/10 posts
slow down kiddo
we get it

>synthetic benchmarks are okay when Intel does better

>mfw ryzen CPU nvidia GPU
SOMEBODY STOP ME

There's that guy who bought the i7 7700k with Ryzen around the corner

I'll give you $100 for it.

>drinking tea
>see this
>spit it out


Neat, but this seems overclocked, there's no way a stock 1800X at 4.0GHz can beat a 7700k at 4.5 in ST benchmark with their IPC being near identical, that's a 12% clock deficit.

Either way what's neat is that we know the 1800X can at least OC over 4.5-4.6GHz

oh hey congrats suicide squad for oscars

That's not a 1800x, fucking retard

Undervolt it and use it for pfsense.

Lmao

It's a 1700X?

That's even better, so a 1700X can overclocked to 4.5? What's left of Intel then?

Fucking retarded AMDrone.

Sounds like a fake. But, it might help Intel to pay more attention on better CPUs. They seem to go to irrelevant shit lately like "The Internet of Things" that I don't give a shit about and it's botnet.

We talked about that Goldman, it's a dead meme

>BUT INTEL IS STILL SUPERIOR IN SINGLE THREAD
TOP FUCKIN KEK

>Sounds like a fake.
It's not, cpu-z reads the CPU opcode, not the CPU_ID which can be spoofed, there's no way to fake this.

Cheaper cpus since AMD went full retarded and didn't launch the R5 together with the R7.
Intel will undercut their i7s and i5s even further, do a fuckton of marketing and by the time people realize it they fucked up they already spend $500 on a motherboard cpu combo

you both go on "look at my single benchmark". it's all bullshit and shilling until people actually test them from reliable sites. when we have at least 40 to 80 testers.

Why compare it to a 1700x with even the boost disabled?

(YOU) AMD Ryzen

>overclocked $400 ryzen
>still barely manages to beat a stock $300 i7-7700K
Literally fucking nothing.

>Cheaper cpus since AMD went full retarded and didn't launch the R5 together with the R7.
They can't launch them because they don't have enough stock, they're all made from 8 core dies and building up stock is harder than building up 8 core stock.
If their yields were bad there'd be plenty of R5 and R3's already though.

>single-thread
>140 / 4.5 (stock turbo clock) = 31,1
>111 / 3.4 (Ryzen with no turbo) = 32,6

dumb intel poster

I wonder when that 7700k got a $40 price cut.

As opposed to AMD's sponsored (read:rigged) benchmarks?

There's no way it's fake, but it's definitely overclocked to 4.7 - 4.8GHz.

So why launch the Enthusiast lineup first?
The vast majority of people just want to spend $200-250 on a cpu max.
I was trying to give my roomate a quickrun on the Ryzen and after 10 minutes of me saying just how much better at everything it was he just said, "yeah but the i5 7600k is cheaper"

Pretty much no reason to buy a ryzen now unless you're a blind AMD loyalist.

> valid.x86.fr/bench/rjmzdu/1
Why isn't this on the actual website?

valid.x86.fr/bench/1

...

or don't live near of their store since they're not shipping those

i7 7700k at 5ghz get a little over 2400 ST. That has to be on LN2.

>i-it's fake, goy

I got another to add

How do you figure? Are you just stupid?

$300 for a 7700k is still $100 too much.
The 1700 ix only $30 more for twice the cores and threads.

The $180 6600k is only $50 less than the lowest Ryzen 6 core, too.

Even if those aren't in-store only and there was 0 tax, those prices are still too high for anyone but idiots.

...

What is "rjmzdu/1" on the link? I can't find this on the actual website.

valid.x86.fr/bench/1

Well there you have it. OP's benchmark is fake.

because it's fake

Not building PC with AMD CPU,GPU,SSD,RAM and painting it RED.

Do you have an answer child or just blindly copying memes?

nice jpeg artifact

>The 1700 ix only $30 more for twice the cores and threads.
and half the single thread performance
I'm all for Ryzen but do not mention the 1700 non x ever again. Only actual retards will buy that.

>>So why launch the Enthusiast lineup first?
Because holy shit why wait 1-2 months when you already got sufficient stock to launch 8 cores?
These are all made for server-first dies, that's why they started with 8 cores.

If people want them they'll buy them, the cheaper 4 and 6 cores will come in some 5-6 weeks later.

...

>b-but muh cores
Why is this still a meme? Have AMD learned nothing from the bulldozer fiasco?

>there's no way to fake this
now, don't be naive ok
just intercept the syscall and return some other value
not hard to do at all

>half
lmao kill yourself

> rjmzdu/1

It's not on the actual CPU-Z list

valid.x86.fr/bench/1

I'm so sorry user, my 280x died and I bought a 1060 the same day under the impression it outclassed the 480.
I feel like such a cunt.

>1-2 months
Try June.

It's the id of the contributor fuckin' faggot

>improve cache, IPC, single-thread performance, power consumption and thermal output for a lower price
>also add more cores
>HEHE XD COREZ COREZ HEHE 4 THREADS IS ALL YOU NEED BABEH

Not OP, but I guess it's because it probably needs a minimum sample size before appearing in the official site.

Because the CPU is not out yet. Check the multi thread tab, no ryzen there either even though we know it outclasses intel

>faked benchmarks
AMD really are desperate aren't they?

Stop samefagging, shill. It's not on the list because it's not officially out yet and it's not in CPU-z's database.

>These are all made for server-first dies
According to the marketing we're seeing they are for gaming.

Oh God this delicious kike meltdown.

If it's not out how did he benchmark it? Checkmate AMDrones.

There's literally no point for anything more than 4C/8T when it comes to gaming builds.

...

>in store pick up.
Don't you know how to use MS paint to blank that you. Bad shill Bad!

I almost feel bad for intel
Almost

>i-it's real guys it's just not official yet
Just stop.

>marketing

Come on, firstly, according to marketing they're content creation first.

Secondly, ignoring dumb marketing, these are all 8 core dies and 4 of these dies will be used for the top end 32core Naples server part, AMD could have made a 4 core die but that would limit them to 16 core server parts which is only the mid-range market.

So you believe what you see from 1 engineering sample posted by AMD itself. Nice. Go back to your mommy now.

I know you're just a troll but it hasn't officially launched yet.
This is a fact

>i-i-i-i'ts fake
>s-stop posting synthetic b-benchmarks
>s-see, it's not in the list
>it's totally n-n-not because it's just one s-sample
Holy shit. Intel shills on suicide watch. It's only going to get better as we approach NDA lift.

THAT DAMAGE CONTROL HAHAAHHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHA

There are other retailers offering exactly the same discount you know.

>F4 stepping
>ES

Your kike tears sustain me.

Another holocaust, right?

...

Who hear seriously believes those aren't posted by AMD itself from cherry picked engineering samples? Nobody has those chips. Not even Microcenter has 1 chip.

I smell a kike.

Nothing to worry my go- friends, Intel is your best best!

*unzips unconfirmed gtav benchmark*

SHUT IT DOWN

>Ryzen can't do Prime numbers
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Shit wrecker seal of approval]

other retailers offer $10 discount you know

DONT BUY RIZEN GOY

YOU ONLY NEED 2 CORES FOR GAYMING

> Nobody has those chips, not even Amazon has a single chip yet
> Let's believe what AMD uploaded from its labs
you AMD shills are so gullible.

youtube.com/watch?v=2Fy87gUVisQ

But this one isn't valid since it makes Intel look bad

You sound nervous.

everyone got chips already, what are you on about? heck they even got them here in russia for prebuilts available day one

>Intel has no competition for several years
>Focuses on energy savings over IPC
>Competition on IPC arrives
>Drop prices by $50 across the board
>6 months later
>new batch of CPUs launched
>completely stomps amd
>Wow nothing happened
gg amd. Yeah I'll be sticking with intel. Thanks for the price drops though.

The chips do not exist yet on the market. Not even in long term storage. Literally nobody has them.
You are posting AMD in-house benchmarks.
Grats, you are literally playing their game.

>AMDrones will defend this