>security.archlinux.org
I thought linux was supposed to be secure
I thought linux was supposed to be secure
Andrew Jones
Other urls found in this thread:
redox-os.org
xlr.sourceforge.net
twitter.com
Michael Cox
>meme AUR
>rolling release
nobody believes that Arch Linux is 'secure'
Ryder Flores
are you retarded? arch gets fixed packages first.
Joseph Allen
>3 vulnerabilities in linux-lts
Thank GNU I don't use the LTS version of Linux :^)
Anthony Sullivan
It also gets all the untested regressions first hand :^)
Anthony Martin
Solus is better anyway
Justin Davis
If you're on unstable
Christopher Baker
>he thinks 2 weeks old is stable
Caleb Gonzalez
In comparison to windows, yes
Charles Baker
>he thinks 2 weeks old is bleeding edge
Owen Campbell
As long as all these retards continue developing in FUCKING C, this lunacy will continue. Forever.
Jack Cox
>We should develop a kernel in rust
Blake Richardson
>rust
you are welcome: redox-os.org
Zachary Morris
It is.
Andrew Perry
>Only for 4.4
4.9 doesn't have this problem. Now that 4.4 is an older LTS expect less updates compared to newer 4.9
Ian Morales
Ban C programming
Levi Lee
At least i don't have to restart every month.
Eli Bell
No one operating system is secure. Every system is vulnerable.
Noah Jenkins
Except TempleOS
David Wright
Kill yourself pajeet your Java loving nigger
Christian Scott
the only good commie is a dead commie
Jack Howard
Physical access allows an attacker to destroy it.
Samuel Smith
Enjoy your divine punishment
Luis Bell
God has blessed Temples so no CIA niggers can use it.
Jaxson Green
Won't it just get rebuilt in three days anyway?
Asher Davis
>t. C pajeet
Just poo in the loo pajeet
Benjamin Jenkins
Why did the redneck post this
Lincoln Cox
Owen Parker
>4.9
have fun with your deprecated kernel
James Ward
It's also stable
Jacob Jenkins
No, Debian stable is stable. Gentoo stable is stable. Arch stable is bleeding edge.
Samuel Roberts
To fire up your neurons for the first time in a while, they rot if you don't use them, you know?
Parker Davis
Arch stable is latest stable upstream packages.
Adrian Nguyen
It is secure, because you know about those bugs so you can
-do prevention or workarounds while they are present
-find the problem in the code, fix it yourself then contribute to the programs project with your fix
-if you cannot fix it yourself, someone eventually do. The most serious Linux problems I witnessed in the past few years got fixed in a few hours flat and fixed packages were on the distros ftp servers next day.
Can you do this with Windows? No. You don't know about most of the bugs. You have no access to the code. Only MS can fix it. See you next patch tuesda-- OH WAIT MONTHLY SECURITY ROLLUPS LMAO
Jordan Gray
Good. Now how many kernels of various operating systems (legacy or still being updated) are written with C?
Isaiah Baker
GNU/Linux*
James Collins
Close to none. That doesn't mean that programmers should corroborate outdated languages and paradigms in a highly distributed world where the security of billions of devices depend on them, even indirectly. Best recent example: Cloudbleed.
Camden Torres
correction: nearly all of them