Why isn't project neon discussed more?

mspoweruser.com/project-neon-windows-10-first-look/
youtube.com/watch?v=TZjHlX3OtAk
windowsreport.com/project-neon-microsoft/

OP rekt in pic related

Disabled by default, shit for brains. Kill yourself.

Pajeet please, your posting style gives you right away. How fucking pathetic can you be?

>I -Its just in the beta! Surely they will remove it!!!

- Pajeet about picture related in early 2015

...

...

...

...

...

Because there's not much info worthy of discussing.

...

bash support confirmed, new aesthetic confirmed, privacy/telemetry options introduced and reduced. is it time to go back to windows?

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

That is how it starts, they insert it slowly so that you don't complain. Moments later you are getting anal by Microsoft and you don't even realize.

wtf I hate windows now

...

...

...

...

>work on a project
>suddenly a nigger appears on your screen

>hey metro is an inconsistent piece of shit
>lets just make a whole new gui

BRAVO MS

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

, that would never go through, so many people would drop Microsoft so very fast,

being honest though I would've switched to Linux a while ago if they had better support for games

>inb4 "ew you still play games"

...

...

...

Thread

RUINED
U
I
N
E
D

where the fuck is the shill
can he explain all this shit in this thread

wincucks BTFO

This thread is a beauty.

It looks like ass, i hope they at least removed 7's interface and made their own.

>implying it matters with 16+ gb of ram.

It matters. I have 24GB of RAM. I'd rather have 21-22GB of RAM free for other purposes - not have half of it "eaten" by Winblows itself.

Wow amazing, a version of Windows for ARM doesn't run x86 programs! 10 rupees were deposited in your account.

Nice retardpost, shit for brains.

Garbagem just like the rest of winblows 10

Bump

Its x86 only though.

Hopefully they don't meme the new explorer

Sorry senpai, you'll have soon bigger problems to worry about

wtf I hate windows now

Beta stage :^)

So it's like Apple's Gatekeeper?

No. Apple only requires a signature, but doesn't take profits from developers who aren't using their store. And people who can use google can turn the restriction off anyway.

>ENTERPRISE USERS
They did this shit for a while now. Just another article jumping on the W10 hate.

>poor poor microsoft getting all this hate speech!!!

Micro$oft doesn't care. Its just a cry to help for the normies who begrudgingly installed W10 thinking there was no other option.

ok

if the government requests it. MS has also been fighting this in court my man

The government now writes microsofts privacy policy?

OK, this thread is pretty derailed, but does anyone know when we might be able to expect the visual upgrade? that's mostly what i'm interested in, also what other features are gonna be provided you think? Actual aesthetic customization this time

>Apple only requires a signature, but doesn't take profits
...except from charging for a developer account.

And it does have an option to restrict downloads to the app store.

no, you moron, MS has little say when the government is asking for data on their network, but there's no evidence and, indeed, evidence against the idea that they're maliciously violating your privacy

April or autumn

>but there's no evidence and, indeed, evidence against the idea that they're maliciously violating your privacy
No, of course not. It's not evidence enough that they have written it into their privacy policy as a possibility.
A developer account has a fixed price

christ you're dumb. Im trying to argue why your snippet from the Privacy Policy does not support your argument.

>we will preserve personal data

>on request

have you even watched The Wire?

>watching american propaganda

...

>dumb frogposter
As expected.

>A developer account has a fixed price
Yes, it does. So what? How is gatekeeper any different from window's new insecure apps thing?

They both have the option to limit programs (or "apps") to their app store, an allow signed apps option, and a disabled option.

>an allow signed apps option,
Except microsoft doesn't have this. They will just block everything not fro the store, as retarded as they have been recently

funny guy user

Funny because that setting has nothing to do with the block of Win32 apps, but only with sideloading modern apps?

...

>apps
JUST FUCK OFF

B O T N E T S H I L L I N G P A J E E T S
F
U
C
K
O
F
F

good thing i only ever install proggies

Jordan pls

what kde is this?

see