Check dependencies

>Check dependencies
>systemd

>using a distro with systemd

...

>using linux

miss having friends?

I use gentoo (with openRC) but the systemd cancer is virtually everywhere.

I use Ubuntu (hence systemd) for normie use on my uni-shitbox tho.

Funtoo has systemd free gnome fork and
drops support for systemd

>gnome
Might as while run systemd

What's the reason to install funtoo rather than gentoo?

...

I don't know about sysv but systemd is virtually trying to do everything. As you "ironically" says, muh minimalism is not systemd priority. Plus it is written in C which is not as practical as scripting languages that are easily modifiable.

Not to mention systemd dev don't give a fuck about stability.

DELET

>mfw Lunix has become more like Windows over the years, except that it has only copied the bad things.

>mfw lunix is trash

Fucken binary blobs. Fucken systemd. Fucken NVIDIA firmware.

It's fine

I'd much rather run systemd than Xorg

I know the feeling friendos. I have been on mint cinnamon for the past few years.

Got the balls and bandwidth to try a few slackware live usb distros like alien bobs and porteus just because: system d

BUT THEY DONT BOOT ! WTF

does slackware not do efi ? literally the only distro that wont boot on my MBA. Help.

As opposed to what, Weston?

I'd rather run gnome with wayland and have to use systemd than avoid systemd and be stuck with X.

Nice nitpicking of a source code.

This is why Sytem D gets all the hate.

an init system and a display server should not be exclusive. Its against the UNIX philosophy.

also if you actually read the snowden documents the only *nix/bsd/oss operating systems they did not have backdoors to were the ones that did not use System D

At NASA we usually include systemd in our custom gentoo builds. It just makes everything much easier.

Easy network setup, easy service enabling/starting, etc.

Poettering is trying hard to turn Linux into Windows

>comparing a shell script to an .INI file

they are pretty much the same what with portages flexibility

it comes down to which devs you like the most

>also if you actually read the snowden documents
WHERE

>Check dependencies
>systemd
It means its shit, don't install it.

>.INI file
>No 800,000 lines of C
lel

Once again, this fucking shit infographic.

!/bin/sh
exec sshd -D -e


Two fucking lines, if you use a real supervisor. Oh, and the supervisor is typically less than 1,000 lines of code. You can actually read the damn thing.

>gnome with wayland
this shit again.

If you want OS X that badly, then buy the fucking thing. Gnome 3 is donkey crap buried in a kimchi pot for three months and garnished with cat vomit. The "design" is about as helpful as a lobotomy and nearly as damaging.

Next time I get a toy desktop that requires a "special hack tool" to access features that are being taken away from me because they may have sharp pointy edges...ah fuckit, pull my finger.

source on this claim

>software shouldn't have dependencies. Its against the UNIX philosophy.
whatever you say

>If you want OS X that badly
I'd rather have openbox, but gnome is literally the only non-tiling window manager that works on wayland.

I miss my Linux install ;_;

What is so bad about systemd?

What is so bad about systemd?

What is so bad about systemd?

What is so bad about systemd?

What is so bad about systemd?

So many wrong things and uninformed layman talk, where does one even begin.

It's comparing service startup files, idiot.
Secondly, compare the lines of the other init systems to the actual init system in systemd, it will be roughly the same. Even then, it doesn't mean anything, retard. Especially not for idiots like yourself.
Kill yourself.

GNOME isn't a window manager, it's a desktop environment. It has a window manager (I think it's called Mutter). There are GNOME addons which can handle tiling or maybe even some built in tiling functionality inside Mutter.