Intel hyberbreading

>Intel hyberbreading
>working properly

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=rW6M8D41ZWU
news.netcraft.com/archives/2017/01/12/january-2017-web-server-survey.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Shut this down please sir.

15 years.

FIFTEEN FUCKING YEARS TO GET HT WORKING.

what kind of game is that?

Hi there, my name is Eshkol Chipstein from Intel Corporation®.

Please cease and desist posting this image immediately.

I have a 3570k ita 4 cores no HT bc its an i5. Very good processor, but i wish 8 core 16t ryzen was optimized. Perhaps more cores will never be better than the optimum 4- 6

>largest http webserver on the planet
>Intel still hasn't fixed HT for this application

The problem with that is Apache is pretty shitty code and can't multitask very well past a certain point - it has the same issues on any modern CPU hardware or OSes.

>want to prove something
>posts some webshit test
pick one

wow, sorry they used an actually important metric instead of manchild game shit.

There's plenty of other stuff that doesn't use a lot of cores but that doesn't lose 40% performance with SMT enabled.

>it's the processor's fault that your shitty benchmark has negative scaling with more threads

...

are there any use cases where hyperthreading is actually beneficial?

No, of course not.
It's merely a joke and Intel and AMD waste precious silicon to have it there.

>using apache
>ever
>even for benchmark

pls kys, shit company, shit software, shit webserver

>30%+ of the worldwide webserver market dun matter!

99% of people don't matter

what's your point?

apache used to be great, now it's garbage

use something that isn't disgraceful to Sup Forums, like nginx
otherwise you might as well go to fucking Sup Forums

>drops in performance on 6 cores
>LET'S TRY 12 THREADS!

HT works just fine. My i7 3770 at 3.3GHz runs right with my i5 4670k at 3.9.

>web dev
>important
performance was never important in that world because of network bottlenecks and huge latencies, so the software sucks

just look at their languages and how awful slow those are
>php
>python
>ruby

tfw they still probably can't comprehend it and want to benchmark a 6950

But it matters when RYZEN sucks with it?

no, apache is garbage. idc what you think is good or bad with it. apache is garbage.

It's still top dog, go eat shit with your buggy newfangled webservers written in the latest hip nodejs library

...

no it isn't, it's garbage and it's one of the slowest web servers out.
nodejs is also shit, stop crying kiddo

kek @ that drop. Looks like people are quickly realizing how bad it is

>15% drop in 3 years

Oh yeah I'm sure ngnix will take over in another 10 years.

It's already taken over every big and medium site

pretty much garbage that doesn't matter, runs the garbage web server

all garbage hosts that charge nothing-15/month for shitty stupid sites all use the most basic of basic LAMP setup.. mysql is also fucking shit

get rekt kid 2-3 people are against your autist past living ass here

It'll happen soon

>performance is the same with 5 and 6 cores
>enabling HT fucks up performance
>HT at fault

are you retarded or something? If performance is the same with 5 and 6 cores it means this piece of crap software doesn't scale beyond 5 threads so enabling HT will by default fuck up the performance. Compare performance with 1 and 2 cores with HT enabled and disabled and see what you get then.

>soon
>apache at 41%
>ngnix at 28% or 29%
>it took ngnix from Sep 2004 to Sep 2006 to gain 8-9% marketshare


Soon is pushing it, 3 years being optimistic.

>HT enabled and disabled and see what you get then.
I get 2% less performance, not 40% less.

Stretching the load on all threads lowers performance, but how much power less does it use? This is kinda important.
If the power gain is big, and you already have adequate performance to serve HTTP to some dozen or hundred people, then it's a no brainer to scale the load on more cores.

>2017
Still waiting for hyperthreading to work

youtube.com/watch?v=rW6M8D41ZWU

Brings back memories.

>Uploaded on Nov 6, 2005
Nice.

news.netcraft.com/archives/2017/01/12/january-2017-web-server-survey.html

rofl it's true

rip apache

even microsoft >

by next year top 1 million sites nginx will be leading

in 5 years nginx will lead overall active sites

in 10 years it'll lead overall dead & alive

Pretty huge difference between "all sites" and "active sites"

Terraria

Looks like grandpa is quite triggered. Stick your reddit spacing up your ass and go back to your safe space >>>/reddit/