>Announcing Guetzli: A New Open Source JPEG Encoder
research.googleblog.com
>Announcing Guetzli: A New Open Source JPEG Encoder
research.googleblog.com
>webp is kill
Can jpeg just die already
>now we put botnet in your dick pics
it was never alive.
What do you recommend then?
Whot got
Well, how about Portable ---NETWORK--- Graphics? It literally in the name.
shit for anything busy like a photograph
Nobody cares, fuck off.
Bitmap compressed into a .7z archive
try to embed EXIF in some other format loser
Then why is ebay, a website that gets like 2 billion visits a year using it?
webp of course
They all look the same to me
Not true
>Then why is ebay, a website that gets like 2 billion visits a year using it?
Why almost no one else does?
Ow wow. JPG has metadata. There is literally NO WAY of adding this functionality to another standard ever again!
it's objective truth
Pedo GTFO
>weeb
I stopped reading
was zum fick?
wieso guetzli, was für en scheiss name
WeBP DOA.
The Googlejpeg codec removes a lot of the green from the image apparently.
why are you talking german to me?
> Using cartoons to compare image compression
Are weebs really this stupid? Or do they experience masochistic pleasure being flamed.
Good, webp sucks.
the new format is called biscuit in swiss german
what a shit choice, at least use something cooler
ebin xddd
But there are default reason to post pics on the Internet.
jpg2k is already a thing... Yet everybody is still using the original.
Because the one who bother to improve image quality is weebs.
For their muh waifu.
in a way it makes sense, since the hardest color for the human eye is to distinguish green (resp diffrences in green tones)
has something to with all the green woods and plants to let the brain ignore most color part
ot memeing here, it's color theory 101
Weebs are why resized images look good in firefox. I'm okay with that.
jpg2k is worse than JPEG encoded with guetzli or mozjpeg in every aspect
They are starting to, facebook, a bunch of messengers are already using webp for most things.
As soon as the SJW browser accepts defeat and adds support for webp, it will become the new one-size-fits-all image format.
We already have a working gimp plug-in for it.
And jewgle released a tool that lets you view webp images normally in windows photo viewer.
developers.google.com
The wheels are already in motion m8.
BPG is already DOA. Nobody wants to pay the 0.6% cuck fee to use it. Companies can literally save millions of dollars by using webp instead of bpg.
exactly. which is why jpeg wins.
some interesting game, if you wanna try
>"Metadata can be stored in 'EXIF' or 'XMP ' chunks."
>"There SHOULD be at most one chunk of each type ('EXIF' and 'XMP '). If there are more such chunks, readers MAY ignore all except the first one. Also, a file may possibly contain both 'EXIF' and 'XMP ' chunks."
developers.google.com
Jesus idiot, right in the name there GRAPHICS not photograph. There's a difference. PNG was mainly intended to replace the use of GIF for web page graphics. That's why it has to be pixel perfect, for lines and shit. Nowadays web graphics is mainly done in code. Any fucking idiot that posts PNG's on Sup Forums, good god you idiots. You'r shitty picture is NOT WORTH >1MB filesize. A jpeg with low compression looks just as good and is a fraction of the size, as intended. This site already struggles with bandwidth and seeing morons post png's just makes me rage really really hard. PNG IS NOT FOR PHOTOS. You're just bogging down the tubes man with your inflated shit.
BMP doesn't support transparency.
webp was never alive. stop trying to make it a thing. also good luck getting CAMERAS to support it.
png without compression at all.
/tread.
So big companies can afford to automatically convert jpegs to webps and store both of them? Wow, JPEG is sure obliterated.
The site does not struggle for bandwidth, stop buying into Tarako lies
But yeah, most PNG's posted here are retarded
>webp was never alive.
ebay and a growing number of messengers and other websites don't agree with you.
>stop trying to make it a thing.
It's already a thing m8
>also good luck getting CAMERAS to support it.
That's the next step in the masterplan.
photoshop already got import/export plug-ins
This is bullshit
>So big companies can afford to automatically convert jpegs to webps and store both of them? Wow, JPEG is sure obliterated.
The conversion probably eats like 0.00001¢ of electricity and soon the jpgs will be deleted as more browsers come to support webp.
>
>BMP doesn't support transparency.
It does
nice meme
loooooooooooool
Bbb-bbb-but it has google machine learning and therefore it's great, isn't it? ISN'T IT?
>they unironically think they can tell the difference between jpeg and png
You're just as bad as the audiophile autists that think they can hear the difference between flac and mp3
>tfw webp will convert shit in single-digit seconds and give you better quality
>This is bullshit
It's Google quality code
>most PNG's
no, you are the retard here
Daala or H.266 intra frame would be good for future still images.
Middle is superior to right since it has better colors.
Than use BMP you sucka
this is why you need an 1800X.
to convert memes.
>guetzli
Fucking swissfags
When's flif going to take over gaypeg and webp?
literally never, it's taken too long to develop and is akin to a semi-custom x265 encoder (ie irrelevant).
Eh, it might have less ringing artifacts but it also seems to be less color accurate. The bottom part of the pupil and the iris are the most obvious.