ITT: we generalize posts as regular expressions

/God I (fucking)? (love|hate) [a-z]+fags./i

OP is, as usual, a massive faggot

^.*$

Obligatory

^[a|b|c|d|e|f|g|h|i|j|k|l|m|n|o|p|q|r|s|t|u|v|w|x|y|z|\s|.|,|:|;|?|!|"|#|ยค|%|&|/|\(|\)]{1,}

No, thanks.

.+

*

rm -rf /

s/op/faggot/g

You just matched every possible thread on Sup Forums :^)

the . at the end should be something like [.!]*

/What does \/g\/ think of [a-zA-Z]+\?/

/(AMD|Intel) (BTFO|is finished)/

/.*(g|G)eneral.*/

>make my regexps for me Sup Forums

/^perfect \w+ do(es)?n'?t exis?-$/i

How is that a regex?

/b+r+a+p+/i

That's a perfectly valid regex.

^.*NORMIES.*RE\+$

>\+

This is [a-zA-Z]{1,}[\.!,] (say something nice about (him|her)|please (don't |no )?bully)[\.!,]

> what is sed

/BR+AP/

/i wish i knew regex. it's so cool/i

/[a-z]{3} thread/i

Perl was great to learn but unfortunately it has abysmally hideous syntax.

Like all fake scripting languages.

>regex
Absolutely problematic. Those regex symbols can present themselves as difficult and threatening, please consider using VerbalExpressions instead.

.canYouRepeatTheQuestion('string');

>using {1,} instead of +
absolutely disgusting

^.+$
Fixed. You can't make empty posts.

>maybe('www.')
What is the fucking point of that line?

>muh punctuation

...

Ryzen sucks (nigger|fucking)? (dick|cock)s?

/I bet( you|cha) can't (golf|shorten) your (code|script) with that(| being obviously (verbal|too long))\./i

S -> But can P parse parentheses? E
P -> ( RE )
RE -> RegEx | Regular Expression
E -> ha E

At least I can't make deeply nested two kind parentheses.

S > SP .
S > SB .
S > S S .

SP > ( EP .
SB > [ EB .

EP > ) .
EP > [ ) EB .
EB > ] .
EB > ( ] EP .