Yfw you realize that you earn significantly less than you should...

>yfw you realize that you earn significantly less than you should, because of women entering the workforce en masse during the 1940's because of WW2, staying in those jobs, causing women holding occupations to become more commonplace, and thus effectively doubling the employee pool for businesses to choose from, thus heavily diminishing the value of your labor and/or expertise.

You are paid less because you are worth less because you are stupid.

desu!

Regardless of what his intelligence is, he's worth less because there is a larger workforce.

Even if he was stupid he would be worth more if there was a smaller workforce.

This.

Can you not into basic math?

yeah goy its the women from 70 years ago's fault

not the literally billions of third worlders (((they))) outsource work to!

Them, too. But the "American Dream" family (1 breadwinner, 1 homemaker) is dead because of this, directly

ok, true
BUT, lets say I'm a CEO, I've got a company I'm set on having grow and prosper. So when going through the hiring process, I would look for individuals, regardless of their sex/ethnicity/religion, who are most fit for the job, who would benefit the company the most, who are more competent, with more skills, more to offer than their immediate competition. Because my priority is with the company's future. Believe it or not, that is how companies succeed in the first place, that is how many (but not all, even though all should) CEOs operate. That is just capitalism 101. An employer's success depends on their employees, and vice versa. It is a fact of life, and its fair to call it common knowledge. People will make an effort to bring you the goods and services you pay for, the way you requested it, because it is their bread and butter, behind every satisfied customer is a satisfied salesman.

If woman couldn't vote there would be less third worlders

you wouldn't get a job in 40's either, neet pedo neckbeard.

The 19th amendment was a huge mistake.

...

>tfw your skill set covers niche material taught in only a handful of universities, and you are one of literally a few hundred people IN THE ENTIRE WORLD that know anything about it.

>tfw everyone else wants to work in non-existent meme specializations like "machine learning" when its just an over-shilled teeny tiny subset of numerical optimization.

And you want to have to support some female leech out of your paycheck why?

Holy fuck I thought I was the only person who knew this.
Fuck women and their equality, all it effectively did was half the income of every individual.

t. a sociologist

The American Dream was always dead. It was only a reality for those who started out already in the upper middle class or better.

>implying sociology is an obscure speciality

Well, it wasn't the only contributor.

I have a theory that its really caused by this effort to "equalize all economies of the globe".

Developed countries comprise less than 15% (I think) of the world population, and the remaining billions are just now entering their "atomic" or "space-age" eras, and spreading abroad without the ability to negotiate their wages (ignorance or just plain disadvantage - not racial disadvantage, but geographic and cultural).

You can, for the most part, thank the likes of pajeet for being unable to negotiate a livable wage in the face of the typical hiring manager.

Failure to negotiate to the advantage of the specialist belongs to all specialists in the field, whereas failure to negotiate in favor of the business is just a problem soon to be solved with more specialists.

Actually, that's the patriarchy's fault. If it wasn't for toxic masculinity making men think they HAD to work to be "real men", the women joining the work force would be balanced out by the men leaving the work force to become stay-at-home parents. Parenthood and careers would thus both be seen as valid lifestyle choices, just as in "traditional" societies, yet there would be less coercion because people would be free to choose what to do with their lives without it being decided for them based on their "gender".

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/kys/

not technology

I don't think it's even really ignorance, it's just that these people KNOW they're only hired BECAUSE they're willing to work for so little. The reason countries are outsourcing to overseas is because of the cheap labor - but the labor and infrastructure is also of lower quality, and companies are ONLY willing to tolerate that so long as it lowers costs. If they demanded to be paid the same as their Western counterparts, they'd no longer be competitive.

>patriarchy
>toxic masculinity

nice unfalsifiable conspiracy theory you have there.

So you're denying that men are coerced into stereotypically masculine roles? Your own theory, that this doesn't happen, is TRIVIAL to falsify. It's on par with saying "Well idk, everyone says water is wet, but maybe all those so-called scientists have been lying all along and it's actually completely dry."

it's an unfalsifiable conspiracy theory. go look up the definition of "unfalsifiable"

fpbp

I'm aware of the definition. What exactly is your reasoning in claiming that coercion into gender roles is an "unfalsifiable conspiracy theory"?

Why can't /pol9k/ stay on its containment boards? How do we fix this?

I think you would be better suited on www.abovetopsecret.com

one justified the other

So would OP then. He has yet to prove that his wages actually would be "significantly higher" if women hadn't entered the workforce.

Do you believe the moon landings were false?

No, why?

Why not?

Because I have not (yet) been given sufficient reason to think they were faked.

That also means that we as consumers benefit from more competition. Cheaper goods = you can get by on a lower income. And more engineers and stuff means more job creating innovation.

But if you're blaming women for decolonization and stuff, then you should know that empires actually encouraged Africans and others to breed so they could have more cheap labor.

So, was landing on the moon an evil patriarchy-inspired conspiracy involving toxic males?

>Holy fuck I thought I was the only person who knew this.
How did you think that a commonly held belief from the dawn of recorded history that's only starting to die off now was somehow uncommon?

So she can stay at home cleaning, cooking and raising your children you simpleton

Why do you MRAs deny male entitlement is a thing?
>abloo abloo I DESERVE a slightly higher income and a submissive wife who doesn't complain when I beat her at the expense of women being oppressed, why doesn't anyone care about my feelings?