Muh second amendment

>muh second amendment

Other urls found in this thread:

instagram.com/tsa
youtu.be/wZrcR3guGG0
youtube.com/watch?v=C70R7oo4jMc
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>be Italian
>get shot

Bravo Iceland

The rate has since gone down btw. This chart is from 2011

How many bullets did you dodge this week?

Freedom is a high stakes game, buddy. Git gud or die young.

What's the rate now?

Freedom ain't free.

>muh guns

It's just a scapegoat that politicians use so they don't have to focus on actual problems the U.S has. Why promise you're going to lessen poverty, improve elementary level education/school servives and improve healthcare services (things which actually cause violence) when you can just say "muh guns" and everyone gullible enough will vote for you?

>only 3.7 per 100 000
That's a lot less than I was expecting.

>uses a different color bar to place emphasis
Graph discarded for showing its bias

ok

UK has more gun murders than France

True desu

Every attempt at gun control has ended in disaster or worse (Fast & Furious) but people still vote for anyone who pretends they can do it

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Finland confirmed for snow niggers

French people lack a spine capable of withstanding recoil.

...

Sometimes I feel sad for Britain's lost power. Then I see shit like this and I remember that they did it to themselves

...

Meh.
It's all niggers. Niggers killing other niggers, I might add.

...

...

>Gun murders
>Not controlling for minorities

Wow, it's literally nothing.

Are suicides counted in those statistics? Because liberals love including gun suicides in these stats while at the same time advocating for the right to die.

...

instagram.com/tsa

Half of these are from gang on gang related shootings. doesn't really affect the rest of the country

epic diagram

A WELL REGULATED MILITIA

>Half
IIRC out of the 12,000 or so homicides in the US annually niggers are responsible for 8500.

A constitutional unorganized militia m8. That means any able bodied male over the age of 18.

Means nothing. "The right of the people to keep and bear arms" is the right protected by the second amendment and the preamble text has no bearing on that.

And?? They are as american as you.

Hell

>Homicide, Suicide, and Unintentional Firearm Fatalities

>GUN MURDERS

"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

I'm for laxer gun laws in the Netherlands, but the second amendement is straight out retarded.
Mentally unstable people shouldn't be allowed to have guns, there should be thorough mental researching before anyone is allowed to have the gun, with annual checkups.
People should be properly taught how to handle a firearm, and in which situations you have to draw it. People under 25 and over 65 shouldn't be allowed to carry arms, but people between 18-25 should be allowed to own them (just not carry them in public, and over 65's shouldn't even be allowed to own them).
When someone get's medicine perscribed, because he is suicidal or something, he should immediatly have his firearms taken away from him.
People with any criminal record at all shouldn't be allowed to carry firearms ever again in their lives.

Probably forgetting some stuff right now, but if you follow strict laws like these, regular people will be allowed to bear arms and the retards and mongs who shoot up schools wouldn't.

Those countries were cherry picked for being countries with very few privately owned firearms, so it doesn't say much.

If you showed a graph with the top 20 countries for firearm homicide, the US wouldn't even be on the list.

>Britcucks think they understand the 2nd Ammendment better than Americans

youtu.be/wZrcR3guGG0

the average Homicide rate in the world is like 6.6/100k so i'm not Sure. War/tribal conflict and all that shit doesnt count in this, and in places like mexico and brazil they have thos eweird fat jungles swords and they kill each other with those.

I don't understand it and not the person who can't even put it into words himself and has to link a 17 minute video that's not even directly related?

Okay Y*nk.

Ban assault negros NOW

>War/tribal conflict and all that shit doesnt count in this

But america is full of black gangs. In fact, it's the places with the black gangs where the gun-controls are highest and the "gun murders" are also highest.

>Germany
>France
>Finland
>very few privately owned firearms

>"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,
We need a well armed militia to defend against tyrants, terrorists, and others who want to take away our freedom.

>the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Exactly what it says.

So altogether, it's saying "Because we need to make sure our country remains free, the right of the people to own and bear arms will not be infringed upon".

I did explain it here

Do it just for western countries

Nope

Doing it for western nations is a better comparison

They're the countries we compare for almost everything else....

>finland has a wopping 0.07 point increase compared to canada.

Fucking savages.

They count as crime, not tribal shit, i find really easy to blame the niggers.

Mexicans should not be taken into account, but blacks are as americans are anglos. Just as the crime and rapes of arabs should be blamed on the arabs.

Only about 1 in every 30,000-ish people die from gun shots. Factor in that most of gun deaths happen in ghettos or gang related violance then it's really not high at all. Education and other public services is what we need to focus on more.

Ebin meem.

Like I said, the preamble concerning the militia has nothing to do with the actual right itself - namely "the right of the people to keep and bear arms". The rights included in the Bill of Rights were considered to be extant and eternal natural rights in the English tradition that were receiving an extra layer of protection from infringement through their explicit declaration. You can't apply caveats or justifications (such as, for example, "a well-regulated militia") to a natural right; it either exists or it doesn't.

That's an odd exception to make. If you blame arabs for the crimes of arabs, why not blame blacks for the crimes of blacks?

I hate to break it to you but it ain't the majority committing these crimes, only the fucking worthless hood people.

A well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state and so to facilitate that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Is how I interpret it.

Arabs are foreign, blacks are not. Is that simple.

People view the U.S as the same country even though it's a federation of 50 states, the same way Americans think that the EU is one country.

There are huge variances of gun crime in America depending on where you live, so yes you're right.

I mean, I think I read once that there is a murder in Chicago once every 17 hours or something, meanwhile in North Dakota murder rates are analogous to my own country.

So when will Arabs start being "natural" then? One native generation? Two?

Then why compare one western nation that has lots of guns in it to a load of western nations that barely have any guns in them according to the very broad category of death by firearm?

Blacks are Africans you idiot

Because they're both at the same level of first worldyness.

This thread again. Fucking Eurocucks never get it right.

>Switzerland
>top 4 guns per capita in the world
>far lower murder rate than the United Kingdom where even KNIVES over a certain length are banned

>Puerto Rico
>extremely tough gun laws, perhaps the most retarded within the US
>top 16 murderous "cunt" on earth

When will people realize MURDERS are the things you should be focusing on, not some petty scapegoat like gun bans which would only further restrict your freedoms. Improve mental healthcare, drugs, protect your borders, remove nigger culture, DO NOT accept immigrants of ANY kind, etc. all these thing will improve your country's murder rates.

And it's not even about who's foreign or not anyway, it's about isolating the actual issue.
You made the excuse for other high 'gun-homicide' by trying to say that tribal violence doesn't count, but the US HAS tribal violence between blacks, which is where the vast bulk of 'gun homicides' actually comes from.

>trying to regulate something you can make in an afternoon with pices you can buy from any hardware store

The uncomfortable (for most people) truth is that the single most significant indicator for violent crime and homicide is the percentage of an area that's non-white. White Americans - including white trash, junkies, etc. - have a murder rate comparable to Finland and for middle-class and above whites it's comparable to western yurop.

FTFF

Yeah, handily missing out Switzerland.

The numbers in case anyone is interested: 52% of murders are perpetrated by black people yet they only represent 13% of the population. If you take non-hispanic white's murder rates, it's on par with European numbers.

>trying to say that tribal violence doesn't count

I'm saying is not counted in those stadistics. War isnt counted either. Are you dense?

And blacks are still americans so is not important to the conversation, it's like saying "if you only count white educated people guatemala is on par with japan".

I just don't like seeing people so rabid about the constitution when they ignore half of it and the government ignores all of it.

You guys need to rewrite it or something because the government infringing your right to keep and bear arms they don't deem suitable is pretty shit.

It's really a by-state situation. Some states have shitty gun laws that allow anybody to open carry without even going through a class.
Combine that with violent gang activity in cities, you will see where the problems come from.

>Blacks
>Americans

WEW.

Not really. It just shows the problem lies elsewhere. If white Americans can have the same murder rates as Europeans, that just demonstrably proves guns are NOT the problem.

Yeah, but considering the current demography, political climate and pressures I'd rather not risk it.

*sniff* 200

Sometimes the battles can be intense and long.

It's gotten so bad I've had to set up auto turrets.

youtube.com/watch?v=C70R7oo4jMc

I'm not saying Guns are the problem, i'm saying that american culture is the problem.

I'd rather have a set of rules that is completely set and stable that the government publicly follows than one that is constantly broken.

I know what you mean though, there's too many irrelevant dolts to ruin it and add silly things.

I'd rather have a set of rules that work well in principle but are enforced poorly than a set of new rules that are consistently enforced but intolerable. I can't even begin to imagine the Sweden-tier nightmare that would happen if the current forces of government got the chance to start from scratch.

Hopefully AI will improve in our lifetimes so we can experience robo-dictators.

>youtube.com/watch?v=C70R7oo4jMc

IS THAT A BOY OR A GIRL

What the fuck? Ridiculously feminine figure but sounds like a boy and man face.

Because literally no country in the world has anywhere near the same level of guns as America, let alone any other first world country - America has double the guns per capita than ANY other country

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country

>Including the personal weapons of the militia. These arms are not taken home with military-issued ammunition. According to current estimations (2014), puts guns per 100 residents at 25.[8]

Plenty of countries have higher gun rates on this list than switzerland when you take this into account including Iceland

>Literally 40 million niggers
>huge land border with Cartel-land

Surprised it isn't higher desu

...

>A list of gun violence
>Mexico not in top 10
There is hope...

>What is drug related crime
I wouldn't trade that right for anything btw