How will Drumpf ever recover?

How will Drumpf ever recover?

Other urls found in this thread:

forums.lanik.us/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=35443
theverge.com/2017/3/29/15100620/congress-fcc-isp-web-browsing-privacy-fire-sale
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

porn sites have always cared about citizens, environments, etc more than government has

>pornhub finally got HTTPS
>all it took was an anti-privacy piece of legislature
what a time to be alive

>living in cuckland
lel

Took them long enough to add fucking HTTPS

So what's the positive angle from Trump with changing these regulations? I get that his other stuff like deporting undesirables and upsetting SJWs is good but this seems like a net loss for citizens.

Remember, Trump plays 45-D chess. He actually is encouraging people to learn about and implement great privacy protections such as using a VPN. The man is a miracle from God.

>publicity stunt to signal
>jewish porn website
really make me think

He really, really, really doesn't want us watching those vids of him drinking russian whore piss.

>liberals

So what? Now your ISP can only sell the duration of your pornsessionsand not the actual video. The data still gives away whether you have problems to get up or finish too fast. You lucky guy, you will get the advertisement or even a sample delivered by mail.
As for the content: Exortic fetishes have special sites anyway.

Meanwhile, Sup Forums still defaults to unencrypted HTTP.

they've had https for years and years

It doesn't matter. Moot and gook moot give your data directly to three letter agencies anyway.

Fucking lazy faggots, trying to mask the fact they took ages to implement something as basic as https with Donald Trump stupid law.

Just think on how much money those jews make with all the tracking JavaScript and malware they run on their porn sites.

yeah I'm wondering the same thing

What's his justification for this, and how does anyone besides ISPs justify it

i has all your datas?

government legislation of private corporations is bad

trump did the right thing by keeping capitalism alive

ISPs will now compete against eachother, because once one stops selling your data, people will want to switch, so the rest will stop selling your data

besides, if your ISP sees Sup Forums they already know what kind of porn you watch

>anti-privacy legislature
its not anti privacy legislature, no legislature was passed.

trump just veto'd privacy legislature, things have been the same the whole time

Pornhub fags get btfo on a daily basis by Kot and SpeedyGonzales. Kek
forums.lanik.us/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=35443
whole thread is a gold mine of humour.

>ISPs will now compete against eachother, because once one stops selling your data, people will want to switch, so the rest will stop selling your data
Get a load of this faggot. That only works when there is true competition amongst multiple ISPs.

>Trump will take away my privacy!!!!!111
>Has Facebook account and post image from Facebook

SJWs are literally THIS STUPID

It's typical Republican corporatist cocksucking, duh. This is exactly what Trumpsters voted for.

Who cares about consumer rights and civil liberties when there's money to be made?

Remember, corporations are people, and you can't deny them their God-given freedom to fuck you in the ass.

this is what (((they))) want you to think

You jest but Sup Forums actually believes this.

This. Retards don't realize that the Obongo measure was only in effect for 4 months. Funny how pornhub didn't give a shit about privacy for the other 8 years of his presidency. Really makes you think.

>Remember, corporations are people

They are. No idea why you would think a collection of people would not have the same rights as they do individually.

>https is hard to implement
>implying Intel, Apple and M$ aren't spying on you anyways
Why are normies so autistic?

Why is it legal for google, microsoft, and facebook to collect and sell your data, but not ok for ISPs? It should be a blanket ban desu.

Except corporations have more rights than the individuals who constitute them.

Wow, turns out this was the solution the whole fucking time. Turns out, you don't need government to force websites not to collect and sell info for it to be a strong selling point.

Capitalism, fucking geniuses.

ISP can still see titles and URL

republicans fucking up what they dont understand
typical

>Porn sites sell user data
>ISP can now get data on ALL websites and sell that data
>Porn sites don't like the idea of ISP cutting them out
>BASED PORN SITES ARE PROTECTING US THANK YOU BASED AF

You can choose to not use any of those sites or services, and block their cookies and tracking scripts across the web. Facebook and Google are not utilities.

Unless you use a VPN, ISPs have a complete view of everything you do online. The only way to opt out is to not have access to the internet.

thanks PornHub

>Drumpf

Die in a fire, faggot.

a bunch of ISPs have come out and said they're not going to sell any data [for now]

So a step in the right direction being thought of but not being taken somehow makes not moving at all acceptable.

What is this stupid defensive logic? Say it like it is.

Government shouldn't be dictating how markets operate. Companies can either sell your info, or...hey, maybe not sell your info and use that as a selling point for their service? Quite frankly, I wouldn't trust any service where the user is the product.

Besides, free markets did not lead to the telecom monopolies. It was all cronyism and corruption, and now Comcast rules half of the country. And thanks to free markets, there are viable alternatives to Google and Facebook, though the network effect is strong.

Just get government OUT OF THE FUCKING MESS

Picking up easy PR points until it becomes a norm, those marketing people need a pat on the back.

Trump: "I gonna hurt to make you stronger."

But I thought Republicans were going to protect us from the globalists stripping away our rights?

>until it becomes a norm

Moot pls
Tell Google to gimme my datas back faggot

So you don't want to see nutrition information or ingredients of the food as well just to get the government out of the market? ISPs not selling your browser habits is at a similar level. You can opt out of google or facebook, there's no alternative to ISPs.

Although I like the idea of privacy being protected with specific legal language for the internet, these types of protection laws seem to breed a very strong idiot. They are usually sloppy in their implementation and make a strong anti-government regulation argument. Also the more protected people are the more time they have to fantasize about ideological shit and hate people they don't even know based on another absurd bunch of ideas that are equally unworkable if implemented.

It's better to have everyone under brunt of the corporate thirst for your information and desire to narrow you down to a predictable and (they hope) moldable entity.

Shut up and buy Chromebook.

TPP is dead

>alternative to Google
>alternative to Facebook

My image had absolutely nothing to do with the TPP.

>offering encryptions
>encryptions
written by a person with Down syndrome

Anyway,how can the isp even see what exactly you're doing online?
I see how the isp can see what server you're communicating with,but isn't the actual traffic encrypted and the traffic key encrypted with the server's public key?

your statement about globalism did, retard

>we have this free market solution that makes us our product better than our competitors
>f-fukcing drumpf! w-we want hillary so the government can charge tax payers 10 billion for this solution we just implemented for 10 dollars

>we have this free market solution that makes us our product better than our competitors
How does it make the product better than competitors?

You can use the internet to a satisfying extent without facebook or google, you can't do that without having an ISP.

T-mobile gives me unlimited data for music that doesn't go against my monthly quota, because I'm a cheap asset that isn't on an unlimited data plan already

>Anyway,how can the isp even see what exactly you're doing online?
>ISP
This is a stupid joke Sup Forums. Or you forget the VPN or Tor part?

So it's OK for Republicans to strip away our rights because they did one good thing?

This. In many areas the local government does enforce a monopoly.

Are people so fucking dumb they fall for this shit?

1. These sites have had HTTPS for a long time
2. The FCC regulations were never put into place
3. These sites have ZERO regulation stopping them from massing and selling data and have never advocated for it. They most likely sell that info.

Hopefully all this hysteria leads to all sites getting HTTPS and VPNs becoming competitive and common place

for a large chunk of Internet users that's simply not true. Search and social media dominate most use, and mobile is overtaking traditional ISP use

>abolishing rules that never went into effect

Are vpns worth user even if I use tor?

There never was a law on the books that prevented this. Also, the FCC ruling states that the FCC cant regulate it and that it is the FTCs problem.

What do you mean? What does that have to do with T-Mobile recording your history and selling personalized ad space?

>people are actually defending this, and Trump, with libertarian arguments, when Trump himself declared the Freedom Caucus to be as much of an enemy as the Democrats

>keeping capitalism alive
>capitalism is always "good"

>The 265 members of Congress who sold you out to ISPs, and how much it cost to buy them
theverge.com/2017/3/29/15100620/congress-fcc-isp-web-browsing-privacy-fire-sale

>Members who own AT&T Inc shares: 42
>Members who own Comcast Corp shares: 30
>Members who own Verizon Communications shares: 40
opensecrets.org

This will enable the government to spy on everyone LEGALLY without having to bother with courts or warrants.

>Expecting any politician to have a spine

>damage control
It doesn't change the priorities if the """""anti""""" globalists Republicans at all. They voted in favor of mainatining the globalists status quo, the Democrats didn't.

that's how their service is better than competitors, which is what you were referring to. I don't even know if they are selling data

But Trump CAMPAIGNED on not being a politician. You can't use this defense.

damage control for what? ISPs have been able to do this the entire time, although many don't

>Implying I was trying to defend him
>Implying that wasn't exactly my point

So it's a good thing that they've been able to do this the entire time? And it's a bad thing that Democrats voted to stop them from doing it?

Yeah, actually. It turns out, if customers demand it enough, an industry could come up with independent, nonprofit orgs to check nutrition info and enforce labeling. Of course, the food industry in the US is a completely socialized and cronyist market that's rigged from the top, but if we made our way back to free markets, that would likely happen.

The ESRB exists. The W3C exists. The MPAA exists. Open industry standards, enforcement, and self-regulation is not only possible, but entirely desirable and has happened many times.

Okay, start the movement, I'll make the logo.

How many Google/Facebook spy bots they have on the website?

How is it bad, especially if they're an ISP who's not even doing it? Multi person households will essentially make everything useless anyway. Don't act like the Democrats are out to save your assets either, Obama easily could have done something about this instead of wasting time with things like tranny bathroom bullshit

>that red text

Wrong.

The only thing they've publicly promised not to do is something that is still not legally possible with the rollback of the FCC rules, but that the media kept incorrectly screaming about like fucking idiots.

Under the Telecommunications Act, it's still illegal for ISPs to sell individuals' browsing histories in any identifiable way. That's why attempts to buy and publish Congresspeople's histories are fucking pointless.

What ISPs do -- and will now continue to do -- is gather your browsing data without your consent, and use it to build a very specific demographic profile that they can then sell to advertisers. This profile doesn't have any names or addresses attached to it, but it's a reflection of everything you do online, and your approximate geographic location. ISPs can then insert ads into pages or videos from companies targeting your profile to sell you stuff.

The FCC rules would have made it mandatory for ISPs to make this profiling an opt-in feature, and they would also have had to inform customers of exactly how their data would be used. Now they don't ever have to do either.

tl;dr ISPs' hollow promises are red herrings. You are still being sold out to advertisers.

Cool, I already started it. It was called "Trump 2016" and the logo is now the president.

"Self-regulation" is the biggest fucking meme that has ever existed. All of those bodies you listed have major problems with transparency and are even more full of cronyism than any government body.

Wew, this thread is 2 years old, has 145 pages and is still ongoing, pornhub whining about adblock. They tried to persue adblock to whitelist analytics for them, fucking top kek. Their last post from one week ago is gud.
>Wait, a sticky thread is a bad thing?

The problem is that ISPs have regional monopolies, so there really isn't any competition.

>

noice

"not real capitalism"

He did dumbass, and the republicans blocked it.
And Republicunts were the ones spending all their time writing tranny bathroom laws changing the status quo over the imaginary epidemic of child rapes in bathrooms.

Sounds like your typical Duterte supporter

That's just deflection

Google is hard to avoid, but possible.
I don't have a choice about using an ISP if I want to function in modern society.

It's not a choice between Google and ISP's, That's like saying that If you don't want AIDS, you're supporting herpes.

>hurr, it's not really a bad thing that Republicans sold their soul to the botnet
KEK

VPNs and Tor have different objectives... But if you don't trust totally on tor and have 60 bucks to spend well, maybe will be an extra layer of protection (with it own holes).

Sure. Now compare their transparency, corruption, cronyism, and inefficiency to: FCC, FDA, SEC, FDIC, EPA, FEC, etc.

They're not even in the same fucking league.

They'll follow FTC privacy rules. Change your DNS if you don't want them feeding you ads. Blocks hosts on your router. Don't be a cheap ass and get a VPN. Or just go about your day as normal and stop being a delusional retard believing there's any privacy whatsoever on the internet. This is basically nothing compared to the mass data collection by the feds, but hey let's waste time on this and Trump being a big meanie

>implying Google wasn't in bed with Hillary

kys my man

Give me a good argument that buying regional monopoly rights from state and local representatives is capitalism, and I'll change my position.

>B-BUT HILLARY
The election is over, Hillary has zero power. It's time for you to own up to the fact that your side has all the power, and take responsibility for what they're doing.

>Change your DNS if you don't want them feeding you ads.

>implying the ISP can't do a reverse lookup of every IP address you connect to

If only the Democrats would focus on shit that actually matters their party wouldn't be so useless

>Trump
>(((Republicans])))

Yeah they're getting along just peachy, idiot. This is a literal nothing burger, but stay mad

so fucking what. The Internet is widely supported by targeted advertising. Stop using it if you're so butthurt

The number of people crying about this with targeted advertising still activated on their phones is at least half, because people are fucking stupid

I'm not the one that's getting defensive and insulting people. Are you sure it's me that's mad?

If pornhub cared about privacy they would have enabled https years ago. Also they track what you watch by IP. Go on pornhub and look at the recommendations and you'll see all the cuck porn your dad's been watching.
They have a good marketing team though.