The Ryzen 6 core Linux benches.
Also includes the 8 cores for comparison, and Dual Xeons, and 16 core Xeon-Ds, and AWS server.
There used to be Xeon Phi compared as well, but seems they removed it since getting it running is a pain.
servethehome.com
Other urls found in this thread:
anandtech.com
twitter.com
Erre's some dhrystone.
Also where the fuck does this guy get all that server hardware.
Intel just BTFO.
The 1600 and 1700 are really best value, come with a 130W cooler and are cheaper, but can OC as much as the expensive X chips, who come without a cooler.
>ryzen quad core beating the 7700k
Absolute horse shit.
There's no 7700k tested you blind goof.
It implies that it scored too low to appear on the list.
I'm looking at these and I see 1500X > 1800X scaling is almost linear from twice the cores, that usually isn't the case with Intel even in highly threaded applications.
This is pretty impressive, Naples will be a monster.
Doesn't imply anything, the guy running these tests is a server seller and he doesn't deal have a 7700k to test because a 7700k is relatively useless to his work.
Here's the guy that runs STH, good long standing friends with Ian from anandtech.
...
00:15 – Patrick’s 2000 cores
01:41 – Atom C2000 Avoton/Rangeley Hardware Bug
09:22 – Denverton and C3000
15:17 – Xeon D-1500 Networking CPUs
18:02 – Opportunities for AMD Naples
Wow, an actual interesting to listen podcast without phone garbage, I'm in.
>Xeon-D 1587
> Recommended Customer Price $1754.00
Lmao
Pay for 16 corz you dumb goy
its a xeon look look shinny ECC and 10GbE, dumb goy you can NEVER have that as a consumer!
Yes I can, it's called a 1700 and any regular 10GbE NIC you can find on ebay, which is about 5 times cheaper.
As if those shitty little Ryzens can run a server.
A dual core can run a server, doesn't mean it can run one well.
AMD weren't joking the fuck around.
Every single day I see these charts (especially the newest ones), the 1700 looks like the top buy for the dollar.
What do you think about the 1600?
>Linux kernel 4.4.2
Didn't AMD made some contribution on recent linux release ? Can it impact the performances of ryzen ?
Yes, but it's a slight increase.
Zen had linux patches a while ago
yes; run an up-to-date kernel. these test boxes are running 4.10.1, btw.
they can't joke anymore, screwing up Ryzen could mean bankruptcy for them.
Not the quoted guy, but best performance to value chip atm. Especially if you're not shy about overclocking. All the Ryzen chips are fundamentally the same and can be pushed to at least 3.9Ghz based on most testing. (The upper end X models can usually hit 4.0 or even 4.1, not really worth the extra cost IMO.) Global Foundries (The makes of the Ryzen Dies) has a damn efficient process and there doesn't seem to much binning due to defective silicon.
*Might* want to invest in a beefier cooler though as they will get a bit warm if you do OC to 3.9.
Do you think a Noctua Nh-15s would be sufficent for a Ryzen chip to go 4.0?
Yes, that thing is overkill. Also a pain in the ass to install. But it'll do the trick.