Honestly, fuck linux

honestly, fuck linux.
I hate these motherfucking cunts so much

Other urls found in this thread:

thewindowsclub.com/winsxs-folder-windows-7-8
community.spiceworks.com/networking/articles/2462-server-virtualization-and-os-trends
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>making a post instead of asking what the second step is

wow your pretty salty for someone who cant find a package and install it

...

second step is to provide more details. what library is version 2.4, and what needs 2.5?
Well, just cp lib2.4 lib2.5
done
of course

this is the combined POWER of linux


FUCK YOU autistic retards. and i really mean: RETARDS.
On windows I just use whatever library I want with whatever version I want and any app comes bundled with what it needs.

Linux: LOL U NEED A DIFFERETN VERSIONNN BRO??? HEY CMON BRO DONT BE CEREAAAZY NOW

>ERROR: library.dll not found

>cp lib2.4 lib2.5
Wait wouldn't this just copy lib2.4 into 2.5? That wouldn't actually change or update files.

>app
D E P O R T E D
E
P
O
R
T
E
D

Agree with OP. IRC is almost fully cunt infested. Most of a time it's not hard to find an asshole who doesn't know the answer to your question but sure can ask you one ( and most of the time stupid ) instead. Slackware has the best irc community I came across.

>Doesn't know how to build a newer library
>Doesn't ask in the github
>CentOS, help me build my specific library because I am too retarded
Pretty sure you call yourself a developer too --in which case you should give up.

why the fuck do you need library version 2.5 instead of 2.4? are you certain you need the new functions provided by 2.5? why not build it yourself, you dumb asshole?

I don't remember the last time I saw that error.

MOTHOERFUCKER I KNOW THAT IM NOT SUDO RIGHT NOW JUST ASK FOR IT YLOU FFUCKING PIECE OF SHIT LINUX WORTHLESS MOTEHRFUCKING CUNT WHORE DISTRO SHIT WORTHLESS DE

run the file manager as root, you god damn retard
or better yet, learn to use chmod, unless you're literally braindead

ITT: lintards justify the awkwardness of linux and its cancerous community vs. ease of use for windows

>app comes bundled with what it needs
Some linux programs do this too.

literally works seamlessly in Windows, but ok i guess I'm stupid XDDD

LOL!!!

FUCK YOU LINUX FAGS HONESTLY JUST KILL YOURSELF YOU FUCKING AUTISTIC CHILD.
THINK
THINK THINK
THINK
BEFORE YOU TYPE

Why Linux has 2% Desktop market share exhibit B

>file permissions
>working seamlessly in windows
lmao, that's a real good one

Neither do I the last time I forgot how to downgrade my packages.

Linux has shit marketshare almost everywhere save for a few niche markets, user.

Literally a feature since Windows ME lmao thewindowsclub.com/winsxs-folder-windows-7-8

Yeah, it should be mv

Most likely OP is too dumb to right it down correctly.

Found the fucker who doesn't have a job.

Windows permissions are insufferable. I have to deal with them every day at an engineering firm and when they're fucked, they're fucked.

Try moving and junctioning winsxs without using WinPE. Good luck.

Also this.

Like what niche markets?

Like for example the glorified calculators they call "supercomputers".

There's no way that graph is correct. Source?

community.spiceworks.com/networking/articles/2462-server-virtualization-and-os-trends

>There's no way that graph is correct
It's not so hard to believe if you've ever been to an actual data center in any reputable company..

>On-premises
Number is inflated because of replication topologies and redundant domain controllers/other services. A Windows server cannot update (and in some shitty cases, not install software) without restarting, and so extraneous redundancies are needed. Needing more Windows servers because they're wildly unreliable does not mean it's the superior option.

This goes for on-premises and datacenter servers.

You people seriously need to get a fucking job where you have to use Windows. You would quit shilling for it within a week.

This is all not to mention those stats are for virtual machines ran by a specific host. You fuckers need to learn to read.

>I suck at windows so I started hating on it
lmao pathetic

>Windows servers are unreliable
Only by your autistic definition of "lol muh uptime". In the real world, nobody cares about that, and Linux is widely considered unreliable due to lack of a proper, wide support network and steep learning-curve, lack of qualified professionals, lack of hardware support, etc.

>Linux
>doesn't even have a stable API
>reliable
Nice joke.

Quads of truth.

>Redhat
>Suse
>lack of hardware support
Nigger, are you high?

but Sup Forums told me linux just works and is totally usable!

defending this shit is exactly why it doesn't improve, and I'm saying this as someone who uses the command line for most things.

Just compile the new version of the library.
Oh wait
>centos
Maybe next time you should use Gentoo or some other distro that actually comes with a compiler.

Fuck off MS shills

Have you tries asking /fglt/? Also what is the problem you are having?

>Uptime
It's not just about the number that is uptime. Having to have secondary domain controllers so I can flop around trying to update shit with no interruptions is the nature of Windows.

Don't get me wrong, there's some slick features you get when you buy into Windows. Linux will never have a good AD DS alternative. That's fine, but neo/g/ just screams "muh market share" while misinterpreting graphs and denying that Windows has serious issues.

>Support
What is RHEL, SuSE, Ubuntu, etc?

>Learning curve
True, but the same could be said for Windows. Documentation can be lacking on occasion.

>Lack of professionals
Alright, what the fuck are you talking about? Are you seriously about to tell me a large corporation would have a serious problem finding Linux admins?

>Hardware support
What hardware? I can see where you're coming from, but you need to elaborate.

>You people seriously need to get a fucking job where you have to use Windows.
Which is pretty much every job out there. Wanna know why? No enterprise uses Linux because it simply is not up to standard. A few of the gravest deal breakers just off the top of my head:

- very poor backwards (and forwards) compatibility
- clusterfuck permissions management (PAM, SELinux, udev, HAL, udisk, upower, libudev, PolicyKit, ConsoleKit, Unix passwd, etc.)
- no unified package signing and verification system (it's virtually impossible to homologate software on Linux)
- no software group policies
- no standard way of mass software deployment
- no CIFS/AD replacement with centralized, easily manageable user directory, simple file sharing and simple network discovery and browsing
- no Network Policy Server alternative
- no production-ready filesystem with deduplication, checksumming and compression
- no proper Terminal Service/Remote Desktop alternative
- massive hardware issues
- regressions, regressions and more regressions

Get fucked, freetard.

>dogshit
FTFY

Pajeet, don't you have a loo to be finding.

Not an argument.

Poo in loo you filthy shitskin.

The multi billion dollar SPA I work for does not agree with you.
We use windows only for domain controllers and email servers , everything else is either redhat or Suse.

I support Linux, but just saying this shit doesn't do anything.

He's right in a lot of regards. Backwards compatibility is lacking, which is why LTS/stable releases are a thing. CIFS/AD are a deal breaker for a lot of people.

I would contend some of those points, but ultimately Linux can't beat Windows on everything. It doesn't even try in a lot of fields.

> try to use some software
> 5 hour odyssey compiling and searching for dependencies, updating, resolving, reparing ldpath, repairing rpath, reading 5k line config.logs from autotools
> oh the software doesnt even do enough of what I want, I need a different tool

mother. FUCKER.

1 poo has been deposited into your loo, pajeet

It's really sad and pathetic that you ran out of arguments.

>We use windows only for domain controllers and email servers
You say that as if it wasn't a lot.

>everything else
Everything else is what? A couple of intranet servers? Please!

>- very poor backwards (and forwards) compatibility
Citation needed
>- clusterfuck permissions management (PAM, SELinux, udev, HAL, udisk, upower, libudev, PolicyKit, ConsoleKit, Unix passwd, etc.)
Do you even know what half of these things are?
>- no unified package signing and verification system (it's virtually impossible to homologate software on Linux)
Doesn't dpkg do this?
>- no software group policies
No need for policies on a working system
>- no standard way of mass software deployment
There isn't one in windows either
>- no CIFS/AD replacement with centralized, easily manageable user directory, simple file sharing and simple network discovery and browsing
Is this samba? No need to replace, shares still work.
cont.

>- no Network Policy Server alternative
>- no production-ready filesystem with deduplication, checksumming and compression
Linux supports all windows filesystems and more, if windows doesn't have it, neither linux does.
>- no proper Terminal Service/Remote Desktop alternative
>what is ssh and vnc
>- massive hardware issues
citation needed
>- regressions, regressions and more regressions
not an argument

Windows is niggerware, hence why they pay Indians to shill it.

>No need for policies on a working system
This nigga confirmed for someone who has no fucking remote clue how systems administration or IT works.

>You say that as if it wasn't a lot.
Actually they are very small number of the ~4000 servers my office manage.

>n-word
Very edgy.

Thanks for confirming windows shills are also redditors

This, Lincucks confirmed for teens.

4,000 print servers

That meme is old and stale, user. If you're trying to be funny, try something else.

>>>/reddit/

>>>/stormfront/

Has a black guy stolen your girlfriend, white boy?

MODS, Sup Forums IS LEAKING AGAIN!!!

> install system openssl
> install my own openssl cuz outdated of course in centos
> install system jemalloc
> install my own jemalloc because oudated of course
> install my own curl because outdated, doesnt have http2 support
> hm it doesnt get picked up, i guess i should try removing the system jemalloc i installed before and see if it works now

nope, broken dnf and yum. just wow. Everytime. Hours of my life wasted yet again on mother. fucking. linux.

EVERY. TIME. For YEARS.

I legit have to reinstall my distro every couple of months because it gets fucked up by something I do.

> inb4 "MUHH ITS U RFAULT LOLLL"

read what i typed mofo

Said the guy defending the operating system advocated by an entire cult of die-hard of communist SJW libruls.

Stay mad, freetard.

>Most likely OP is too dumb to right it down correctly.
>right it down
3/10 made me reply

GNU is not linux, pajeet

You are either a pajeet or a juan and thus incapable of using anything but windows, holy shit you retarded monkey if you bother to read the thread you would find a solution to your extremely trivial problem but instead you shitpost.
also sage.

What's wrong with righte?

Why do you specifically need to use CentOS? You might have better luck using something like Ubuntu or Fedora is you need newer updated packages.

Aren't CentOS's repositories a little old.

ITT windows kids

shows over folks

don't use centOS, then, dumbass.

gentoo doesn't have this issue.

windows is a great OS op you should use it


[spoiler]
if you like sucking dicks you cocksucker[/spoiler]

>[/spoiler]

[spoiler]Jobs dies.[/spoiler]

...

It's just Linux. Not GNU/+Linux you spack.

Didn't make the picture, got it from somewhere else.
Also you missed the entire point of the picture and only looked at the OS names. Good job, you spack.

But that's wrong, you fucking retard.

You can use linux without GNU, pajeet. One poo has been deposited into your loo.

Well, GNU/Linux isn't created by a company, it's created by the internet. You can't expect it to have the same kind of support.

WHO THE FUCK CARES WHETHER IT'S GNU/LINUX, GNU+LINUX, LINUX OR VARIATIONS OF THAT
JUST CALL IT WHATEVER THE FUCK YOU WANT, STOP FIGHTING ABOUT WHAT THE FUCKING NAME IS AND FOCUS ON THE ACTUAL OS INSTEAD YOU IGNORANT FUCKS

MAKE PROGRESS AND STOP FIGHTING ABOUT NON-IMPORTANT SHIT YOU RETARDS

I'd love to see you try to compile Linux without GCC, you nescient mouthbreather.

You forgot OS X users.

GCC runs on windows too, but that doesn't make it GNU/Windows, dumbass

you can do it with clang although it's not fun

it's turbo autists man
basically think of the type of person that would actually say that bash is a decent language
then think of the type of person that thinks emacs is a great IDE for web development

now combine those two and you realize the nuclear autism power that powers the GNU/linux name spergs

>MAKE PROGRESS AND STOP FIGHTING ABOUT NON-IMPORTANT SHIT YOU RETARDS
If shitposts like this worked, Linux might not be such a joke on the desktop.

Keep in mind Linux is a kernel, what's built on top of it is the important part. Android is immensely popular. Desktop Linux is still a mess.

You don't need GCC to compile Windows, you idiot. It's not about where it runs, it's about what depends on it. How can you be so dense?

If you have to patch anything, then by definition you can't. Stop the mental contortionism.

OH IT DEPENDS ON MY COMPILER SO I CAN SHOVE THE NAME OF GNU ON IT

"Can" as in "it's possible", but it's not usable. Without glibc, there's no nsswitch, and without nsswitch, you can't do anything serious enterprise networking stuff.

>can't do anything serious
bullshit, I have built systems based on musl. just patch the libc itself

>complains about something that can be easily scripted

Sometimes I'm glad people like you think Linux is hard to use, because I don't want retards like you shitting all over the OS like you do with Wangblows.

Cool, let's have a Skype confcall then. Oh wait...

Skype requires the use of a client program that is not free software; in other words, the users don't control it — it controls them.

A nonfree program denies users freedom, which is unjust in itself. Making the ethical issue sharper, for you to use Skype is to encourage someone else to use Skype, which means you're pressuring someone else to surrender freedom as well. This is plenty of reason to refuse to use Skype, but there are more reasons.

Skype refuses to say whether it can eavesdrop on calls. That almost certainly means it can do so.
Skype gave personal data about a Wikileaks supporter to another company without any legal obligation to do so.
Skype churns the meaning of preference settings, and gives its users a run-around when someone cheats them.
Microsoft has changed Skype to make it easier for states to snoop on users.
Skype messages are not encrypted for the whole trip: Microsoft can read them. And Microsoft does read them.
The author of the first article ended by bending over backwards to legitimize everything else that is wrong with Skype, such as the use of a nonfree client program, but you don't have to follow him in that.

What to use instead? The most obvious alternative is a long-distance phone card. They are quite cheap nowadays, and they work with any phone. There are also free programs you can use, such as Ekiga, Mumble, Jitsi and more.

Why is disabling of devices not a standard fucking GUI feature?
Why do I have to script it first?
Why is it not natively built in as a normal fucking GUI application?
Even fucking Windows 95 has this feature.

Saying "oh you can just script it though" is like saying "Here's a new monitor, oh but to turn it on or off you need to open it up first and connect wire A to wire B manually. Then short the wire in socket BUS_32 with GATE_4 and there you go! Simple!"

What the fuck is this bullshit?

>be a retard
>can't afford RHEL subscription that would help me solve my problems
>get the free version of it
>complain it has no support

such is life in the 3rd world

Hi, rms. Please explain to him why it's "GNU+Linux", and not "Linux".

Linux*

Or you could just go the Windows route and have support pretty much for free, because Windows actually works and doesn't require you to go through a hundred hoops before you can achieve a certain goal.
And even if something doesn't work, Google has your back and you're pretty much guaranteed to find a solution.