Why don't AMD fix their single core performance?
Why don't AMD fix their single core performance?
Nathaniel Baker
Easton Peterson
Why doesn't your mom fix her single porn performance?
William Thomas
...
Brayden Bennett
People dont get one thing.
We got single core performance so high that hypertreading was introduced to make a fucking use of all that power and rather spread that performance between more threads.
Zachary Gray
single core is bretty gud when you compare clock-to-clock performance from jewtels offerings.
Jacob Walker
Ryder Roberts
Why hasn't Intel improved its single thread performance for 4 years?
Do you seriously think Intel will be able to hide behind higher clockspeeds on low core parts for more than a year?
Julian Flores
Just wait for graphene, Intel will once again take the lead with 10GHz
Michael Campbell
I'm waiting for their unobtanium based CPUs. Gonna hit 100 THz on air.
Nathaniel Baker
Wow, this is brutal.
If Agner fucking Fog tells you something like this, Intel is truly damn fucked.
Eli Collins
FTL Quantum cores will be able to compute into the future and obtain answers even before they were queried
Henry Ramirez
>agner.org
>The single thread IPC is higher than that of anything intel
is this guy retarded or just ignorant?
Wyatt Ramirez
Neither: dtu.dk
Insanely smart and highly trusted in the industry for his words due to long history of reliable contribution to the computing industry.
Jack Martinez
because from bulldozer until very recently, AMD was banking on every application becoming extremely multi-threaded *and* calling on the CPU to handle that parallel workload. Something which hasn't....really happened, sure there's a use for more than 4c/8t in workloads like video production, but we're also seeing a lot of the workloads that would require such parallelization being offloaded to the GPU more and more, since those are already vastly more parallel. A trend that'll probably continue, leading to 8c/16t being the sweet spot for a while to come.
Adam Price
I'm still expecting 6c/12t to be the new standard.
Easton Gutierrez
>He doesn't know about Agner "Jew Wrangler" Fog
Kayden Price
Of course it will, intel has nowhere else to go until next architecture and amd is still very focused on multithreaded performances. And when old games like GTA V are nearly bottlenecked by i5s, it's pretty obvious that the consumer industry will have to shift to more cores. It's also more power efficient than intel 4.7GHz housefires so you can expect laptops to up the core count too.
Angel Nelson
Except he is completely wrong
Anthony Green
Says you.
Bentley Jones
Except he's not
Christian Thompson
why doesn't intel fix their multi core performance?
>pic related: $330 CPU vs $1600 CPU
Hunter Williams
...
Sebastian Myers
Ryzen does not have more IPC than anything intel has to offer
Alexander Morris
From what I understand, hyperthreading only kicks into effect once more threads are being used than you have physical cores. If you're playing a game designed for a quad core CPU on a quad core CPU without hyper threading, the CPU will use all four cores without hyper threading instead of using two cores with hyper threading.
Cameron Richardson
Shit, I meant quad core CPU WITH hyperthreading.
Kayden Gray
>AMD just killed entire INTEL division
NVIDIA is next
Grayson Barnes
>AMD just killed entire INTEL division
Shit I can really feel their market share still being above 60% what is intel gonna do
Levi Nelson
Because only poorly made programs rely on single threaded performance nowadays. The future is packing as many cores in as possible while maintaining an acceptable level of single threaded performance for legacy applications.
Cooper Hughes
you realize that's 30% less than last year?
for giants like intel it's a disaster, the bigger you are the bigger every little blow becomes
Jaxson Clark
...
Nicholas Russell
honestly, I love the fact that cpu performance has stagnated because now I don't feel the need to upgrade for a very long time
William Brooks
Single thread will never disappear. Not every program can be parallelized, even in theory, and writing parallel code is much more expensive. Even parallel engines rely on a master loop to keep things sync'd. The future is only in parallel CPUs because we've hit a wall in single core performance. Taking advantage of 2-4 cores isn't hard but 8? Yeah... very tough thus DX12 to get something out of it.