>2Znm
What did they mean by this?
>>60037301
Lincoln Cooper
Other urls found in this thread:
arstechnica.com
twitter.com
Nolan Bailey
>384-bit I/Os
topkeke
Aiden Green
>AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
>Intel /nvidia prices increase thrice
Charles Sanchez
>With a forthcoming high-end graphics card of 384-bit I/Os, this DRAM processes up to 768GB(Gigabytes) of graphics data per second.
>More memory bandwidth than AYYMD HOUSEFIRES 512GB/s max HBM2 2 modules
AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH
Hudson Martin
>new memory is released, is faster than older memory
HOLY PENIS WHAT A SCOOP
John Carter
>wait for pascal
>wait for vega
>wait for gddr6
REEEEEEEEEE
Ayden Mitchell
you do know hbm3 is already in the works and is post to provide 64gb of vram and 1tb+ of bandwidth right?
also this is old news. hbm3 and gddr6 info was released back in august of 2016. everyone knew hynix was going to release gddr6 in 2017 with the first cards utilizing it in 2018.
arstechnica.com
>HBM3: Cheaper, up to 64GB on-package, and terabytes-per-second bandwidth
David Kelly
i guess nvidia btfo too since they're using hbm2 in their high end pascal workstation cards. wow everyone btfo and finished~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jayden Gutierrez
Oh good I can't wait for another 8-10 GDDR modules on my card sucking up 40% of the card's power budget
Joseph Baker
512-bit 16GHz (lel) GDDR6 = 1024 GB/s
4-stack 1024-bit 2GHz HBM2 = 1024 GB/s
Fury X = 4096-bit bus @ 500MHz = 512GB/s on HBM1
Gabriel Ramirez
>Both Hynix and Samsung are working on HBM3 (Samsung is calling its version "Extreme HBM"), although neither has committed to a firm release date. AMD's current GPU roadmap points to its Navi architecture—the follow up to Vega, which itself follows Polaris—using "NextGen memory," and is due for release in 2018.
>Both Hynix and Samsung
>Hynix ALSO WORKING ON GDDR6
HYNIX BTFO AND FINISHEDDDDDD HYNIX! HOW WILL HYNIX EVER RECOVER?
Kayden Carter
>still 32bit per module
Lol
Blake Rodriguez
This. The Pascal GP102 already reaches faster speeds than HBM2. GDDR6 will probably reach 1 TB/s on a 384bit bus.
Owen Rodriguez
>by 10GB/s
>while using 4 times the power
Uh, yeah.
Jaxon Powell
AMD uses 4 times the power? It is not that bad, but yes, I think Vega will consume at least 50W more.
Julian Watson
I know you're intentionally being retarded, but HBM will always consume much less power than off-die memory
William White
HBM2 vs GDDR5X.
One stack of HBM2 has more bandwidth 5 modules of GDDR5X, it also uses a shitload less power.
Power you could be using for the GPU.
Anthony Baker
>256bit GDDR6 card will have 512GB/s of memory bandwidth, same as HBM2 2 stack meme but much cheaper due to not dealing with immature through silicon vias & interposer cost
TOP KEK, AYYMDPOORFAGS
Owen Brown
HBM should also have lower latency.
On top of that, it uses way less power and not waste PCB space so you can get similar stuff to a Nano.
GDDR* is only okay for midrange-lowend stuff
Cooper Carter
SK Hynix also makes HBM so I guess they're btfo-ing themselves?
Jose Gomez
Nvidia also uses HBM2 in P100 (mezzazine and PCIe) so I guess they also got BTFO
Grayson Nelson
Wait™
Nathaniel Foster
GDDR6 follows the same path as GDDR5/X, which is to upclock the memory in return for higher bandwidth. But this also means it consumes far more power.
HBM will always be the better implementation of the two. Die stacks + larger memory channels at lower speeds = better than non-die stack + smaller memory channels and niggahertz speeds.
Grayson Perez
underrated
Juan Green
No, seriously, what did they mean by this? I'm curious.