Hey Sup Forums have you gotten Ryzen yet?

Hey Sup Forums have you gotten Ryzen yet?

I'm thinking of getting a 1600x as it seems to be the best bang for buck gaming wise

just get the 1600 and overclock it, the 1600x is just for people too dumb to overclock a 1600 or not willing to bet on the silicon lottery

Yeh, it just came in today but my am4 upgrade kit for my heatsink don't come in till thursday

get at least 1700

i bought a 1800x. pretty gud m8. love it.

Not worth 450 dollars since all I do is play Arma and use Photoshop and I'm not limited on performance

I got it, I like it, gave new life to my 390 after i72600, no kidding, didn't expect that. Thought it would be just sidegrade for two more cores on the cheap - it's not.
And i'm not even running memory at 3200 yet just stock 2133, gigabyte get your shit together already dammit. Imagine things will get only better.

My 1800x gets 120fps while playing Arma 3. I do of course have a powerful GPU, and run over 1080p like most gamers. Arma 3 benefits from more cores, and strong GPU like any other game. Ryzen is made for games like Arma 3 especially if you intend to stream.

There is a problem with that, you see 1600x runs 3.7 out of box at ~1.2v some do lower, 1600 runs same voltage at 3.3-3.4 and 4.0 at 1.45v 70C

you can keep 1600x under 100w at 4.0
1600 goes into 110w at 4.0

$30 is not that much to keep the thing cool
if you can't afford a cooler, then sure, go 1600

RYZEN plays Arma 3 just fine. The developer just pushed a new update that renders all old benchmarks made obsolete. All those old benchmarks that you saw on YouTube were made with early bios, and un-updated windows. This doesn't matter anyways because no one plays that old as game anymore. I don't understand why I have to see people even post about this shit game whenever RYZEN pops up.

>Arma 3 benefits from more cores
user, it runs on two cores
arma has shit engine.

last bastion of defense.
it's really hard shilling against solid facts.

Intel shillord detected.

other choice is stuttering housefire

No I haven't on ivy waiting for zen+. excited for the new apu though, I might make a sff htpc with one.
>everyone has a 1080ti and a high refresh display

Arma 3 is an outlier. It's the only game out that doesn't run as well as it does on an overclocked i7-7700k house fire. This game shouldn't even be mentioned because the developers have always favors Intel, and Nvidia. Probably a backroom deal between Jews.

>implying you need high refresh rate to notice stutter

Or they're just incompetent?

>Hey Sup Forums have you gotten Ryzen yet?

No my 4690k is fine for the time being. Might consider ryzen alongside Intel's offerings when I decide to upgrade in a couple years time.

>Bullshit: the post

This, regular Arma player here. The game maxes out one core and barely uses a second one. You really need a high single core performance.

Might as well respond to all of these
This just isn't true at all. Arma 3 has a terrible engine and cannot spread the load properly over anything more than 4 cores
Sure It runs Arma fine but not as well as my current CPU which still even has issues cause the engine sucks shit even with all it's patches
Not defending anything, I am autistic and only play Arma and use photoshop for work
Not even close to a shill either, I'm not telling anyone to buy anything, I'm just answering OPs question. I would love to get Ryzen, I'm just stating that as of now I do not have a need for it and spending 450 dollars on it would not be beneficial to me.
My CPU never goes over 55C, kabylake is the only housefire I'm aware of and I don't own a 7700k, nor do I ever sutter. I have a 4k monitor cause photoshop
Yeah it should never ever be used as a benchmark or any sort of performance metric ever, hence why I'm only mentioning it personally. The devs don't favor Nvidia at all, that's why they kicked out gameworks

(you)

Actually gonna correct the stutter part really quick
I do stutter in Arma when aiming in a sniper scope, but I think that happens to alot of people. As for any other casual game I play I am kinda capped at 60hz so I don't notice anything since my GPU keeps everything at 60 constantly, no bad frametimes.

It's completely true though
Notice how at 4k cores, everything is spread decently, nice load metric. Then with 4 cores 8 threads shit starts to get a little odd, then complete 8 cores it isn't even trying anymore. Happens with 6 cores 8 cores, anything above just 4

Forgot to attach image

an i7 won't be at 100% unless you're at max settings >120fps. You get hitching when the gpu isn't saturated. By your logic
6c/12t+=no stuttter butter
4c/8t=Stutterfire™
4c/4t=chops like a Ginsu®
2c/4t= :( Your PC ran into a problem it couldn't handle, and now it needs to restart.

I've monitored my CPU when playing GTA 5 and during gameplay I never go above 40% usage on really any cores. The only time I hit 100 is loading screens
t. 60hz cuck

no need, sandy bridge is still enough

I pre-ordered Ryzen back in late February.

Still haven't been able to use it yet. Motherboard didn't arrive until last week, and the HSF I got didn't come with the right bracket which I didn't find out about until the motherboard arrived. Maybe that'll arrive this week?

Waiting is what you do when you buy AMD.

Which heatsink and motherboard?

>gaming
Just get the 7700k and shit on everyone with an amd

way too expensive, I'll stick with my 8350, unless I find a cheap dual 2011 board

But does anyone really play tomb raider at 175 FPS?

OP here's 1600x ryzen vs 7700k intel

1600x system is $123 cheaper. (Here in Canada the difference is even bigger - $215 CAD, or $160 USD)

I guarantee you that putting the $120 bucks into a better graphics card will do significantly more to improve gaming performance than the 5% or whatever difference between the 1600x and 7700k in singlethreaded gaming performance.

(And that's not counting paying for delidding the 7700k...)

No, bought a 2600K off Ali, OCed to 4.2, seems to be doing fine.

Well yeah but isn't the 1600x supposed to compete withe the i5s?
I feel like if someone was going to ditch their 7700k they would want a 1700x right?
I would ditch my 6700k for an 1800x just because I like to have whatever the top tier is

>(And that's not counting paying for delidding the 7700k...)
Razer blade and liquid metal?

240hz monitors are becoming the high refresh standard in less than 1 year

Yeah but tomb raider?

any excuse to stay at low res garbage i see

Are those free?

Of course you picked the cheapest b350 amd board against the most expensive z270 chipset on the intel side, totally not biased

>Ryzen

As if next years Intel chips wont be leagues above next years AMD chips. They literally caught up once and they are still just miniature PC heaters.

Stop memeing please. this is 2017.

they think you have to send it into a professional
delidding XXX-lake processors is easy as shit. The silicon glue is so thin and there are no capacitors under the IHS to worry about

I would call Intel housefires 'miniature' PC heaters

wouldn't*

About 15 burger bucks for some liquid metal
Razorblades are pretty much free, can pick one up from the post office

>is easy as shit
sure is when it's held in place by cheap shitty silicon and toothpaste, thanks intel

If you want a better chance at higher clocks the X variants are more likely.
Often with $10-20 difference I see no reason at this point to cheap out on them.

Ryzen 7 1700
93% reach 3.8GHz @ 1.376V
70% reach 3.9GHz @ 1.408V
20% reach 4.0GHz @ 1.440V

Ryzen 7 1700X
100% reach 3.8GHz @ 1.360V
77% reach 3.9GHz @ 1.392V
33% reach 4.0GHz @ 1.424V

Ryzen 7 1800X
100% reach 3.8GHz (assumed)
97% reach 3.9GHz @ 1.376V
67% reach 4.0GHz @ 1.408V
20% reach 4.1GHz @ 1.440V

1. That's not the cheapest b350 board
2. That's the board I'm going with on my 1600x build for real
3. That's not the most expensive z270 board either

intelfag in denial?

>1.440v

Actually the TIM is the hardest part about it
The silicon glue is basically like rubber, flexible so it doesn't fuck up the PCB in manufacturing. The TIM is actually stickier than the silicon. I remember when I took apart my 4790k for shits and giggles it was pretty stuck. I had to use a blow drier

>Hey Sup Forums have you gotten Ryzen yet?
No, I use condoms.

I don't think either of you understand. It doesn't matter if you do it yourself, unless you happen to have that shit laying around, which most people don't; it's going to cost extra money to delid. It is not "do it for free" levels of performance like an AMD microcode update :^)

b-b-but they'll patch it, AMD is a new arch while Intel is shitting out the same one for 6 years

The fact that you have to delid at all is the issue here

>the same one for 6 years
try 11

The only processor you kinda HAVE to delid is the 7700k
Like I said I only did it to mine just for fun, to actually be able to say "yeah I've done it before" so I could later charge my friends for their kabylake delids, was worth it. Only takes about 10 minutes

Ivy Bridge was a housefire too

I have a 1700X. I would Reccomend the 1600X for overclockers, the 1700 for most people, and the 1800X for enthusiasts with too much money.

AMD did a reasonable job of binning their CPU's and the 1600X/1800X do actually overclock better that the other chips on average.

Highest OC? 5.3 here

No it wasn't
Ivy bridge didn't have thermal issues, the only mentions of housefires I've seen are from here.

IT was a space heater compared to Sandy Bridge, which was the last time Intel ever had a significant improvement over a previous generation

>1600x
Probably a good bang for the buck but you should consider the 1600.

The 1600x is a 95W part and the 1600 is a 65W part.

If noise, specially noise, and power usage are important to you then the 1600 is the obvious choice. Just so you get where I'm coming from; I have a 65W CPU with a gigantic Pure Rock cooler rated for 140W. I've set the fan to spin at 50C. It starts spinning slowly if I tax all CPU-cores at full load for more than 20 minutes (video encoding and so on). I'm not buying a CPU with a TDP above 65W again, passive cooling most of time time and a so quiet fan I barely hear it if I listen for it under full load is something I'm not moving away from.

Then why does amd perform like shit in comparasion to Intel today?

>Well yeah but isn't the 1600x supposed to compete withe the i5s?
What do you need six cores for? r5 is more than enough.

There's a reason that siliconlottery doesn't sell the 1600. They just don't clock as high as the 1600X.

>Moshi moshi! Baito des!

Even then, how confident are you that you won't scratch or crush the die?
Can you afford a second attempt, because intel won't reimburse you for mutilating the chip.

Look at the benchmarks 7700k shits on any amd chip in any game without gpu bottlenecks

(You)

Hello, yes, this is bait.

If you're a dumb nigger who can't delid his chip without breaking it you deserve it

not even 240p what are you doing

>everything that's against what I say is bait

Smells of poo in here

...

The 1600x is 1700/1800 single-threaded performance but fewer cores so less multithreaded performance. There's no reason to go 1700+ if you're looking for gaming. That's purely workstation or splurging.

So comparing the 7700k to the 1700 and 1800 is fucking retarded, which is probably why all the intel fanboys and shills do it. The actual performance comparisons should be between the 1600x / 1600 vs the 7700k / 7700.

And in that case, the 1600x/1600 gets virtually the same singlethreaded gaming performance as the 1800x/1700 vs the 7700k, but also gets better performance virtually everywhere else outside of gaming AND it costs $120+ LESS.

Intelfags are paying an extra hundred plus bucks to get just slightly better gaming performance (and usually in games unoptimized for ryzen at that!) out of their CPU when they could literally use the money saved with ryzen to buy a better GPU. No question about it, 1600x + better GPU means you get substantially better gaming performance (better min frametimes too), and then the 1600x's better multithreaded performance means you do better in everything that isn't videogames on top of it.

Literally the ONLY reason to buy a 7700k is if money isn't a concern and you're just going balls out, which is like 0.0001% of the market.

>>>r_/le.amd/
>>>/shittingstreet/

The die can break by just trying to divorce the IHS from the die with all silicon fully removed.
They're fragile as fuck. You're not fooling anyone.

stop posting dumb newfag

It's incredibly Easy
it's actually a full inch from the edge of the heatspreader to the side of the die
As long as you aren't spastic then it's a piece of cake. No force required

>1600/1700 same single core performance as 7700k

Lul no

>he shills intel for free
ranjesh it's time to leave

>memes vs benchmarks

Dumb shitskin

>intelshill can not even read

>video games
>cpu benchmarks
pick one

>Indian
>Intel

That's amd. An Intel shill would be a Goldberg.

good job trying to trick us intel shill, those are the thermals of each cpu

housefires strike again

Do you not realize you literally just proved his point?

He didn't say the 1600x was the same performance as the 7700k you fucking retard pajeet, he said the 1600x was the same gaming performance as the 1800x which your shitty cherrypicked chart literally proves for him.

Which only further makes the point he was making. Holy fuck you stupid idiot you literally btfo yourself

>indian intelectuals

>1800x reaching 93 degrees
jesus

a paid shill would be goldberg, the jews can trick the pajeet minds very easily into shilling them for free

>7700k minimum 102c
DELID THIS

You can't buy a gpu better than a 1080ti and get performance higher than a 7700k poojet

A little warm maybe but not a housefire. old 212 non evo, 3550 binned to max with 103.7 bclk bump.
3770k when cranked to the max gets toasty
hotter than and on fire is a pretty big spread.

What? Intel posted that they understand why people delid and warranty covers delidded CPUs as long as you return with original ihs. IMO they should solder, but whatever.

>You can't buy a gpu better than a 1080ti
yes you can
>and get performance higher than a 7700k
yes everyone on earth knows 7700k has the best stuttering in the industry

Poor shitskin, you have literally no factual comeback so you just throw random poo lmao

Enjoy your low fps poo in loo

>kaby lake is literally the new 3.5gb

Don't bother with this Just a falseflag, don't waste your time

Of course you're going to say that it's 'easy'. Because you're only after a sale. You don't give a fuck if one of us blows hundreds on a chip, only to break it before it's even installed.