China will grow larger

China will grow larger.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/6o61Ml_bCOo
thediplomat.com/2015/11/us-announces-boost-to-maritime-security-assistance-to-southeast-asia/
abc.net.au/news/2016-06-09/china-russia-navies-sail-into-contested-japanese-east-china-sea/7496084
youtube.com/watch?v=sLdgM8VQu7I
twitter.com/AnonBabble

unlike their cocks

Unfunny samefag meme thread. Gonna screen cap this and post it to /r/Sup Forums?

I BUILD FOR CHINA

This

It has a better chance than Russia.

super-power by 2020, east asia will be best asia.

>BBC News - Condoms 'too big' for Indian men

Says the gypsy.

human capital is somewhat the same, but 1.3 billion people is just mind boggling.

if they get to japan's level of development and manage to abandon retarded cultural backwardness they will likely displace the western world's role in the world. might be a bad thing or a good thing.

>might be a bad thing or a good thing.

youtu.be/6o61Ml_bCOo

That means we'll have more of these :3

Are you a cousin of Taksin?

whites aren't accepted within china though,as anything but foreigners especially among the elites who only really accept full chinese people.

i personally don't take niall ferguson that seriously after his exchange with krugman. he has some pretty strong biases that aren't driven by empirical evidence.

CHINAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Chinese actually have normal cocks for Asians.
It's the fucking Indians and Koreans who bring the average down. Faggots.

im fucking scared of Chinese invention.13700millione haters hate us,can you imagine this???

*extension

With rearmament, We beat them.

yeah. its engrained strongly in their curriculum to promote nationalism.

pretty stupid imo, it creates a lot of idiotic nationalists like the ones you see in korea and japan.

>China must grow thread
>Canadians always reply
every fucking time

Why do you start threads and then never post in them?

go back to britain you subhuman piece of shit

Japanese boys are just the Internet warrior though lol
We have only economical cards in deplomatic term,but its usless for china anymore.
actually we were finnished in 1945.

east asian military cooperation is picking up though, cooperation is happening between countries around china.

US is already planning to give hundreds of millions and now russia and india are kinda getting into the south china sea situation.

thediplomat.com/2015/11/us-announces-boost-to-maritime-security-assistance-to-southeast-asia/

Dont worry. Just keep producing ur shit like anime, no one would kill u.

>It'll look REAL nice when its done.

abc.net.au/news/2016-06-09/china-russia-navies-sail-into-contested-japanese-east-china-sea/7496084

>Chinese, Russian navies sail into contested Japanese East China Sea waters


China and Russia's navies are conducting joint patrols around the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands.
This angers the Japanese and the US, for a Sino-Russian military alliance will be undefeatable.

>A Sino-Russian Military alliance will be undefeatable
>2016
>implying raw man power matters
>implying the US Navy alone doesnt have more equipment than both of those nations put together and multiplied by two

RARGER

Let's just ignore the fact we can't put all out forces in the Pacific m8

Pretty sure the Pacific Fleet by itself is more than capable.

Russian ships are dated, only a single power projecting warship from the early 80s, and Chinese Ships are modernish, but are far too few.

NATIONALISM WILL BRING US VICTORY

>still thinking that raw manpower is their only advantage

It is their geography, Russia's endless supply of resources and energy, and their combined industrial power - especially of China's.

With Russia behind China, China wont fear any blockade anymore. They will have all the resources and arable land they need from Russia. Even now, China is heavily investing in Russian agriculture and mineral deposites so that they can sustain a war-effort even if their whole coast is getting blockaded by the USN.

Russia, with China behind their backs, will never lack any consumer products and money anymore, as well as will have a ready customer for their weapons and energy exports.

And not to forget, with Russia's nuclear arsenal behind their backs, China wont have to fear US nuclear blackmail anymore. They could freely take Taiwan whenever they want, or sink US aircraft carriers with their ASBMs without fear of nuclear retribution.

Combined, the Sino-Russian alliance will become a super-state that the US will not be able to crack.

I think you are forgetting a ton of factors.

For one, China already has a nuclear arsenal.
Two, You can argue that the greatest deterrent against using Nukes is Nukes themselves. The dumbasses in the White House will gladly level as much as Asia as possible while they burn themselves.

>Also implying Aircraft Carriers dont have an entire fleet surrounding them,with the sole intent and purpose of shooting down missiles

Germanbro I like where you are coming from, but please do a bit of tampering on wiki or something

Deterrence against nukes are nukes indeed, but it did not prevent certain americans to spread the meme that the US would answer with nukes every time China did something bad to them. Such as taking Taiwan or sinking an US carrier. And no matter if the US carrier battle group is protected by an escort fleet of SM-3/SM-6 equipped Aegis cruisers and destroyers, it is a numbers game. SM-3s are very limited in number because hyper expensive, and ships, in the end, are ships and have limited supply of everything due to weight and space.

China's rocket force, on the other hand, is based on land and hidden inside China's 3000 miles long Underground Great Wall tunnel network, that contain storage and production facilities of missiles as well. A PLA Rocket Force missile unit fires 72 ballistic missiles just for commissioning test and evaluation - you can bet that they will fire ten times the missiles in wartime, that will completely saturate any carrier group's defenses.

And since the US will be extremely and utterly buttmad of having lost a carrier group to an ASBM strike, nukes are to fly - but since Russia has China's back in this scenario, that wont happen. Russia still has more nukes than the US - and combined with China's smaller nuclear force, both of them will achieve nuclear superiority over the US, forcing the US to suck up that loss and go home.

WE WILL LIVE IN PROSPERITY

If the threat of Nukes is a major factor, the US can just as easily follow the MAD policy once again. You can literally have a conventional war without a nuclear exchange, simply because years of conventional war wont even come close to nuclear result.

Its annoying to think some people still consider Nukes war-stoppers, when, just as much as they deter war, they also deter their own usage. A conventional land-war between these alliances would be far more interesting.

Pic related, >JUST< the Airforce, the United States would easily have aerial superiority.

I suppose we're ignoring the rampant issues with both China and Russia, from a variety of factors of course.

Lmao I wouldn't be too sure.

Most ships are weeks away in Cali.

And WW3 would be settled with nukes before it gets to such a point anyways.

> the Airforce, the United States would easily have aerial superiority.

With your host: JAPANESE AIRFIELDS

Japan Bros pls

To be fair, only the fighters would require Japanese Airstrips, most of those bombers can fly back and forth from Hawaii

Lmao I wouldn't be too sure.

Most ships are weeks away in Cali.

And WW3 would be settled with nukes before it gets to such a point anyways. >the United States would easily have aerial superiority.

The PLAAF is larger by itself. And has more 4th gens.

It's not 2000 anymore.

>PLAAF
2-3,000 Aircraft
>USAF
5,137 Aircraft

Maybe raw numbers dont count. Technologically speaking the USAF has every single advantage, including its 400+ some satellites.
F-22s and F-16s are still capable aircraft, but I suppose the Chinese would know that very well constantly copying our designs.

Actually u dont need to say too much. I have made the conclusion:
USA NO1!! USA NO1!!USA NO1!!

You said picture related, not the entire USAF.

Now go fucking off yourself.

Also, your numbers are out of date. Stop going to wikipedia.

>Not posting a contrary
>Not defending yourself anymore
Okay user. I'm gonna go play Metro 2033 if thats alright with you.

t. ling chang

>Russia's nuclear arsenal behind their backs,
I thought this was supposed to be an intelligent board

...

I AM BIG

China should drop the communist thing, though.

You better stop hating nukes. They may one day save your asses.

Tbh if they rekt you you would have well deserved this. Nanking and shit is like poking a bear with a stick and being proud of it.

>two wrongs make a right
>implying the Chinese never went full retard

六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre
反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward
文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution
人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system
民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行
法輪功 Falun Dafa 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗
胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨
獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 肅清 活摘器官
社會 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩
台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達喇嘛 Dalai Lama
新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 東突厥斯坦 East Turkistan
内蒙古自治區 The Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 南蒙古 South Mongolia

>surplus males

China is creating multiple generations of /r9k/-tier men. If you only count only the surplus males, their numbers are larger than the population of many countries. These robots will be asked (coerced) by the CCP to share the burden of supporting the HUGE retiring population, without any expectation or possibility of a happily married life.

>the robot uprising will happen in our lifetime, and it will happen in China.

The problem is the amount of nukes we have.
Even by blasting it on russian territory all at once this planet would be doomed.

You literally contradicted yourself in the same post.

Or they'll just spend a few hundred bucks and get some South Asian/African pussy.

Oh wait, they are.

Nope. I'm saying that two wrongs don't make a right and that China's anger for Japan's WW2 crimes is understandable yet it doesn't justify doing the same thing to the Japanese (because two wrongs don't make a right).

they hate Japan with a blind fervor. When Tokyo incorporated Senkaku/Diaoyutai islands, rioters in China went around destroying sushi restaurants (owned by Chinese people) and overturning Toyotas/Hondas (owned by Chinese people).

You wish

Even half chinese are not that bad

Sexbots. Problem solved.

Besides, until the last 80 years, China has had a long history of polygamy. There were always tons of losers every generation who could not get a girl. That society is used to it.

I agree, two Wongs don't make a white.

Let me show you your post.

>two wrongs make a right
>implying the Chinese never went full retard

Your second point is literally contradicting your first.

Because those islands are neither Japanese nor Chinese, and the Japanese annexed them like Crimea.

Also, the destruction of those products and companies did affect Japanese companies negatively. It was a reaction against what they view as "traitors."

Which is arguably an accurate view. But it is counterproductive.

they are not robots you know

t. knower

if you look down on people nothing good will happen obviously

>two wrongs make a right
Perhaps I should've added "implying" in the beginning to make it obvious.

>There were always tons of losers every generation who could not get a girl.
there were also constant periods where bands of outlaw men roamed around China engaging in banditry. Coincidence?

But not taller
Fucking manlets kek

me on the right. i am greek.

thats a big guy

...

Time to liberate Japan?

t.Chang

I fail to see the correlation

youtube.com/watch?v=sLdgM8VQu7I
Japan has a secret weapon

>bimbos in uniform

Oh I know something's growing larger all right.

no such thing as nan king
chink lies