What are these?

What are these? What goes on here? Someone give me the cold, hard, throbbing facts

freenet is very usable, if slow, gnunet isn't usable, never used i2p and never heard of syndie

Freenet - slow CP and podcasts
I2P - leet hacors with smattering of cp
GNUNet - it's fucking nothing
Syndie - Literally what

rtfm/search them

>CP
So it turns out whenever some zealot talks about privacy or freedom, they're actually just pedophiles.That explains a lot.

>freenet
botnet

>gnunet
gnu+botnet

>i2p
slowest botnet ever

>syndie
literally who: the botnet

All it means is that people who share CP like anonymous networks. Shouldn't come as a huge surprise. It's also not something you can avoid as long as you hold on to the ideals of anonymity and true freedom of speech.

If "true freedom" means child pornography, then I don't believe in it.

If free will means being able to commit crimes I don't want free will lol

I remember reading an article by a security researcher where he said they if your anonymity tool doesn't have pedos using it then you fucked up the security somehow. Because aside from like, actual spies and shit, that's the group with the most stringent security requirements.

Either everyone has strong security and anonymity, or nobody does. You can't have it both ways. If your communication network is secure enough to protect (for instance) a democracy campaigner in Asia from the Chinese Army, then it's also powerful enough to protect a pedo in Nebraska from the FBI.

Really activates my almonds

Jesus Christ I'm glad fucktards like him will never actually have power

>stallman is a pedo
This comes as no surprise

Instead of making appeals to emotion why not state why he is wrong

Why does freedom always equate to CP with you people?

Ah yes, remember Christopher Columbus? He and others left Europe to discover America, a place where you could look at CP and not get in trouble!

Animals and corpses can't say no. But he is right about the rest

thanks hill'ry

He's wrong because pedophilia is detrimental to society as it fucks kids up psychologically, even if they do consent.

Fuck off with you bullshit pedo crap I hope all you faggots die in a fire

>coercing a dead body

Freenet:?
Gnunet:?
Syndie:?
I2p:torrents

>rms supports necrophilia, zoophilia, pedophilia, and incest

What if no children are hurt in the making of the content? Say you have pictures of yourself in the bath when you were a kid for some reason and you decide to put them on the internet when you grow up, no child is hurt because that child is an adult now and just consented to that distribution by putting it online so how is that a crime? Just banning cp because it offends common morality is oppressive and just leads people with the mental condition of pedophilia with no outlet but assaulting children.

>necrophilia
The person is dead therefore no one is harmed.
>zoophilia
It is a little tricky to judge if an animal consents I'll give you that
>pedophilia
This is another one that is tricky to identify consent
>incest
As long as the people involved are consenting there isn't really anything wrong with it, as long as you don't have a line of incestuous relations to fuck up the gene pool

>privacytools.io removed Duckduckgo
>recommends Signal

>desecrating remains
Unless they agreed before death that they're cool with their body being used that way, there's no consent, which means necrophilia is rape.
>animals
Idk about this one, if you want to be the next Mr.hands, as long as the horse is cool with it I guess that's perfectly okay. If animals can consent to sex, what other rights should they have? Surely it follows that they shouldn't be slaughtered unless they consent, right?
>incest
Perfectly okay as long as no inbred babies are created.
>children
Children can't consent and anyone who claims otherwise deserves to be raped violently.

Use silence instead, they forked it from signal and it doesn't use the stupid online service it just goes over sms.

CC was a piece of shit