Why aren't 4:3 resolution monitors industry leading if the majority of pc users are gamers and programmers?

why aren't 4:3 resolution monitors industry leading if the majority of pc users are gamers and programmers?

Other urls found in this thread:

swift.ac.uk/about/files/vision.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

This is obvious bait. However, just in case I'm wrong - it's because you have 2 eyes and a wide fov

...that's a dude, isnt it?

Ofcourse and not even cute one.
I demand cute trap!

16:9 is shit and is only pushed because it's cheaper to produce from factories that also make 16:9 TVs

YOU FUCKING CROSS BOARDING SHILL FUCK

Fuck you, I would fuck his cute mouth

Because you are dirty homosexual degenerate,I as heterosexul demand him to look like cute girl.

You're an idiot. The field of vision for humans is better approximated by 4:3 monitors. Wide aspect ratio adoption has nothing to do with human vision and everything to do with filmmaker's love of panoramic shots.

24 inch widescreen is best for field of vision because you do not have to move head or eyes from middle.
On ultrawide you have to move to sides
and on not wide enought you gotta move to top or bottom or you miss a lot from fov

>it's because you have 2 eyes and a wide fov
swift.ac.uk/about/files/vision.pdf

That's a cute boy.

soe is a girl (｡>﹏

but where do i find them?

soembie

>The field of vision for humans is better approximated by 4:3 monitors.

That is only relevant if you cover most of you field of view with a screen. Like in a cinema. For computers, aspect ratio is better as either very wide or very tall.

Very rarely is square preferable.

my penis thanks you

dont sexualize her

i love my gf soe!

Because movies are widescreen. At least we're getting away from this 16:9 bullshit now that 21:9's becoming a thing.

Oh I know her (him)