AMD

Why does this company even exist?

All of their products are easily replaced by better and cheaper ones from their competitors.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=TWFzWRoVNnE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I don't think your next check from intel will go through

Intel expects better effort than that, Goldstein.

Why does this shitty bait thread even exist?

All of this could be easily replaced by quality threads.

AMD shills calling me a shill, oh the irony.

same reason why firefox, linux and android exist, even when chrome, windows and iphone clearly are the superior options.

PLEASE BUY INTEL CORE i9. PLSSSSS

100 Shillings deposited to your accout

If AMD didn't exist, Intel would go full-on anti-consumer and make retarded decisions. They would probably fight and win any legal battles regarding laws against monopolies, and they would lobby hard to maintain their status. Idiots on the consumer end will be happily eating their shit.

>anti-consumer and make retarded decisions.

What is Skylake-X?

>3 different I/O lane configurations
>no ECC
>TIM
>RFID
>$300 RAID unlock dongle
>high end HCC Xeon rebadges end of year/next year

>high end HCC Xeon rebadges end of year/next year
Unholy kek what?

Fuck AMD, bunch of antisemites Islam cocksuckers

ASUS rep mentioned that the 18 core will come next year.
A good quarter or two after threadripper comes.

You retard, they would get broken due to monopoly laws 100%

The best thing that could happen for all consumers is for AMD to die.

(OP)
To collect your delicious tears you fucking kike shitposter.

That's the only legitimate answer I can think of.

AMD exists so shitposters can pretend it's a good company.

No need to shill when your product stack objectively reduces Intel to the bentium g4560 and the 7700k.

(You)

Why are AMD shills so delusional?

LMAO even the single biggest Intel shill on YouTube made a 15 minute video calling out the failure cascade that is Skylake-X/KabyLake-X

AMDtards showing their amazing intellect yet again

>Photoshop

>Photoshop

>Photoshop

>0.04 seconds faster
wtf i love intel now

It's not only faster, it also costs half as much

It's ridiculous, Ryzen is both slower and more expensive

1600X is slower than a dual core in this bench desu senpai

To protect intel and nvidia from get hit by anti-monopoly laws. AMD provides them with """"""""competition""""""""" technically speaking so they are safe to do as they please.

If AMD would to go under, they would get split up and someone with money would probably buy what was left of AMD and try the business. Best thing that could happen since AMD can't provide competition for shit.

...

>competitor*s*
can't wait for VIA's new multicore beast desu

Exactly

AMDtards don't even realize they are literally supporting Intel and Nvidia by keeping AMD on life support

...

nice cherry picking 2 programs. i can cherry pick 2 video games as well and show you how intel's """"specialty"""" and """"domination"""" in gayming is over.
also my cherry picking is more objective as it shows how newer game are running better on ryzen since they actually take advantage of several cores.

No, they would not. They could easily cite how ARM has taken over the CPU market. ARM is also entering the server industry as we speak... Maybe not x86 but it is still competition and that is what counts.

Claim:
>All of their products are easily replaced by better and cheaper ones from their competitors.

And yet... they aren't. Really makes you think, eh?

Interesting how the roles are reversing. Intel is becoming the budget friendly CPU brand with i3's and i5's that have good gaming performance.

I considered buying intel but AMD fans are so antisemitic that I cannot allow their company to success for moral reasons.

Wut? G4560 is their only good CPU.

That Pentium and 7700k are only Intel choices now, the 7700k not very much if you're running higher resolutions.

*considered buying AMD.

That's hilarious, here's a benchmark of streaming, something Ryzen is supposed to be great at, running Doom

Oh no, what a surprise

AMDtard's antisemitism is really odd considering AMD literally puts out communist propaganda in their marketing.

AMDtards are truly braindead, they don't even know what they are supporting.

>this thread

>Cherry picking
Ah yes, because picking the most single threaded tasks in the entire Adobe Suite isn't cherry picking.

>G4560 is their only good CPU.

Why do AMDtards keep pushing this retarded myth.

Intel completely owns the low-end market, trades blows in the mid-range market, and then completely dominates in the high-end.

>Cost per FPS

Hello Ramesh.

Yes schlomo, AMD is finished

...

...

>Why does a company that sells 6900k performance for half the price exist
Gee, I don't know.

>better and cheaper
what planet are we on, shlomo?

you of all people should know that something being better means you'll part with more shekels to have it

...

>what is vulkan
>paying twice the money for 1.8 minutes
>in 1 (one) program
i prefer paying twice less and have better performance like here:

And here

LOL Pajeets call me when AMD can run modern games decently.

I regret instantly buying a discounted Z170 motherboard, because that and buying a 6600k for mid-ground on Skylake fucked me pretty hard.
Should I just sell all my electronics and buy Ryzen 1600 & GTX1070/Vega-equivalent?

Intel
>Cheaper.
Nvidia
>Cheaper....

Looks like 6950X performance there.

gj on a 6% improvement on another cherry picked list of programs, using TWICE the money. you realize threadripper will cost the same as an i7-6900k?

The $1,000 Threadripper is going to be a 16-core at 3.5/3.9 with higher single core performance from 2:1 infinity fabric speed and more overclocking potential than an 1800x due to being the b2 stepping.

It is going to utterly dumpster the entire Skylake-X line-up virtually the entirety of Intel's single-socket Xeon range.

Pic related should utterly terrify Intel.

LOL, even Intel's boypocci (AKA Linus) broke down and admitted that kabylake-x is retarded

Threadripper caught Jewtell with their pants down

youtube.com/watch?v=TWFzWRoVNnE

Is this the Dedicated Intel Damage Control shilling thread since the board is full of other threads laughing at them and calling them out on their bullshit?

Other vey

Ryzen was the worse thing since the shoah

>7700k
>good
Not when 1700X exists.

תכבה את זה!

except; not in the budget market where amd mostly provides the most bang for the buck

>the city of Intel

>64c/128t

Jesus the sort of I/O on that would have to be enormous.

>$2000 Intel 18 core
>slower than 16 core has no ECC
>tootpaste
>only certified Intel SSDs if you wanna use RAID1 or 5
>RFID


How did Intel fuck up this badly?

>ONE POINT TWO
>N
>E

>P
>O
>I
>N
>T

>T
>W
>O

>GIGAHERTZ
>I
>G
>A
>H
>E
>R
>T
>Z

I wonder if it throttles because of shitty cooler thay had or it's actually TIMs fault

It was probably running closer to 2.7ghz.

Why would a STOCK Xeon Gold throttle? It's not overclocked.

it is got to do with ringbus. when core count rises, it tends to get hot and slow.

There's such a thing as an all core turbo on every Intel chip, it's usually way bigger than its base clock.

If it was running even faster than 2.7ghz it makes that score even more laughable.

It 120% is, all Xeons(rare exceptions like some Xeon-D's aside) have an all boost turbo.

Now compare the 1800k dumbass.

...

It's sad but true

Intel is definitively cheaper in the CPU market, and AMD might have been slightly cheaper in the GPU market if it weren't for miners skyrocketing the prices of their GPUs.

Now if you want to build a budget machine, Intel + Nvidia is a no brainer.

muh fps per dollar

G4560 is pretty great for price/performance, but AMD R3's and APUs have yet to come out.

The hyber-breaded bentium is the only Intel cpu worth buying until you hit the 7700k. Whether raven ridge can best the pentium is the unknown factor but i'd wager it does simply because 1) we know AMD's exist igpus slaughter anything Intel makes outside of iris pro and 2) we know zen cores are competitive performance wise.

Personally I want to see what an overclocked AMD APU can do, I hope it can clock higher than Ryzen because it's 1 CCX

It won't clock higher - all ryzen chips slam into a 4ghz wall that they basically cannot easily cross without suicide voltages, its a design limitation. If you took any of the R7 chips (preferably the 1800x) and disabled an entire CCX you won't get anything extra and that is a chip that hits just over 4ghz single core turbo out of the box.

Terrorists and Chinks use their AMD gpus to mine fake currency

that's literally all there is to it, they buy AMDshit by the thousands

Firstly I've seen 4.2GHz Ryzens around.
Secondly, desktop APUs are late this year or Q1 2018, which gives them plenty of time for another silicon respin even better than the B2 one threadripper will be, which might boost maximum clocks.
Thirdly, there's obvious process tweaks that can be done to increase Fmax, and then since the AM4 APUs are so late they might actually be on 14nm+ like Ryzen 2 in Q1 will be

can't wait for this jew fuck to get fired

>jew
If only. At least old schlomo Otellini was competent.

gr8 b8 m8 i r8 it 8/8

>AMD has processors with good performance/price ratio but that are a bit slower than the top intel models which are very expensive and hardly anyway will buy anyway.
>The difference between the intel's top models and the AMD ones is small considering the price difference.
>"lol Are you a poorfag? You need more than what AMD offers. Intel has the bet top processor therefore you should buy intel even if you ain't gonna buy their top models".
>AMD launches Ryzen.
>Top end models beats intel in most tasks while being cheaper.
>More computational power while being a better offer than what intel used to have.
>"lol you don't need more than what intel offers."
>"My crystal ball tells me that programs or games will never use more than 4 cores. Settle for a 4 core cpu."
>"The proof is this specific kind of task (games not prepared to use more than 4 threads for example). Therefore multithreading is a meme."
>"AMD has been hyping their expensive processors that are not that good in games anyway."
>"Buy instead a pentium processor, it performs the same as the expensive Ryzen anyway."
- How does this logic works?.
- Now Intel users hates AMD users because they're richfags?.
- This people basically accepted in those threads that they hyped and recommended Intel's expensive core i7/i5 processors as an argument to not buy amd when a pentium is more than enough for the tasks "that matters" anyway making moot their own initial point?
- Are this people not even aware of the efforts to implement better multithreading in different tasks including videogames?.
How many of you have noticed all this fallacies and backpedalling coming from these people? are we being telemarketed?

Also
>AMD has processors with noticiabily worse energy efficience but not necessarily bad for the average user.
>"Buy intel, energy efficiency matters. Do you want a housefire? enjoy"
>AMD launches Ryzen.
>Better energy efficience than intel.
>"Buy a core i7, what it matters is clock frecuencies and a bit more FPS in games".
>Energy efficiency now even mentioned in the threads.
So, since when energy efficiency doesn't matter anymore? Is this the pentium 4 era again when people used to think clock frecuencies is a way to compare performance?

>AMD breaks overclocking records.
>"Ryzen is terrible on overclocking."
>It's not mentioned that overclocking 8 threads is not the same as overclocking 4 threads.
>It's not mentioned you can disable cores and overclock only 4 cores.
Are this people forgotting this "details" by mistake? or it's on purpose?.

Also
>"Look, AMD make this honest mistakes that can be fixed (for example the failed overclock on live or the EFI issues). Ryzen is DOA!."
>Meanwhile they're defending a company (Intel) that has screwed their users over the years, for example milking them with a lot of different incompatible sockets and setting unrealistic prices.
>Meanwhile this people forget that Inteld has been found guilty on using anti competitive tactics like bribing laptop and pc makers, manipulating opinions on social media (by social media i mean any public place where people can chat, including Sup Forums) with astroturfing tactics, bribing reviewers (see the recent leak), looking at ways to cripple competitiors instead of making better products.
>Meanwhile this people defend a company that clearly just invest the minimum on innovation and that can survive a long time losing money if they want until competitors cannot work anymore.
This people don't grasp the bubble they're creating by thrashtalking and trying to deter people from buying AMD. They'll get cheaper processors from Intel now and if AMD dissapears the prices will rise to the moon.
In what way is this people bennefited by rewarding this kind of behavior from intel? In what way is this people bennefited with a monopoly? Are they people paid by people who invested in Intel to avoid losing as much money as possible?

In a room with 2 rapists I support the person who brings the lube

The AMD apu's are going to be out by back to school time. They figure that's going to be where they make the most of their sales from

...

The biggest market for AMD's CPUs are the data centers, and AMD's current 8 core offerings go toe to toe with processors configurations that are $700-$1200.

not the edit

It's almost like you can make each CPU brand appear better depending on the test...