AMD on suicide watch
AMD on suicide watch
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Is this the new 800x600 Skyrim benchmark?
>720p
Nobody with a 200 dollar and up processor, games at that resolution.
Not sure what's worse, 720p or Dirt 4
>720p
720p
hahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahaha
I have a 1440p monitor. so the cpu actually makes no fucking difference, i could run this game on my 4670k machine and it would be equal to my 1800x machine.
oh yeah, i'm also retarded enough to buy a $600 cpu+mobo combo and play at absolute poorfag resolutions, stressing the total of my two cores at the absolute maximum and frying eggs on my heatsink because i haven't delided my 6 gorillahertz processor yet because it is not advised by thou holy, (((intel)))
>this is how intelbabbys conduct their "gaming"
AHAHAHAHA
>gorillahertz
FUCK YEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH BOIIIIII
GONNA BUY ME SUM 7700K AND 1080 Ti AND PLAY AT THE ABSOLUTE BEST 720p RESOLUTION AND ULTRA SETTINGS
WOOOOOOOOOOOO
Oh wow, the miniscule percentage of people who have a top tier graphics card and play on shit resolutions will never go AMD now, you win this time intel. For everyone who doesn't use their computer exclusively for gayman the Ryzen processors are superior.
why didnt they do the 640x480 test?
>720p
I assume this is so it's not limited to GPU and it's all CPU?
I guess %10 is ok, is this overclocked or stock?
honestly gpu will always be limiting factor and when this gen finally starts limiting the gpu, it wont matter if you have intel or amd since 10-15% is literally nothing.
Why is this allowed? Benchmarking at 720p?
800x600? What do you need 320x240 for?
>older than 15
>gaymen
intel on suicide watch.
We should only bench on 80x24 terminals with graphics converted to ASCII.
720p ensures that the graphics card is not bottle necking.
>benchmarks at 720p
Current state of Intel shills.
This is a gpu bottleneck
This is a cpu under-utilization game, probably dual core only, there is no way than all ryzen cpu score the same.
>there is no way than all ryzen cpu score the same.
You can tell it doesn't hit cache pretty hard either given how close each family of cpus are.
>This is a gpu bottleneck
As games should be.
So gaymers could just get Ryzen chips and rely their gaming performance mainly on GPU, destroying Intel in the process? Bad goyim
Indeed. If a game is coded well it should utlize the FULL resources of a GPU. Otherwise your GPU would be underperforming. A GPU bottlenexk is a GOOD thing. But idiots on Sup Forums try to pass it off as something wrong with a benchmark.
Yes. See.
what I see is $250 cpu performs same as $320 cpu and significantly better than $230 cpu from intel.
Which sucks, 4k a ways away..
>CPU bottlenecks
Why is this allowed?
I got some news for you dumbass, nobody except CSGO players play games at settings that are shit enough for the graphics card to have the privilege of not being the bottleneck for once.
Enjoy your games at 720p I guess, faggot. I'm gonna use slightly above average graphics settings and enjoy games that actually look like they wouldn't run on an Xbox 360.
>720p
If you're going outside real world use cases to change the result of your test, at what point is it a synthetic benchmark?
youtube.com
right away, anything under 1080p is irrelevant
how is there not already a project on github that does this?
libcaca
>same fps 99% of the time
Why do you care if the max goes higher?
99% FPS is all that matters. You want smooth.
...