Thanks to Infinity Fabric and to high yelds, AMD is using 99,9% of Ryzen Die

Thanks to Infinity Fabric and to high yelds, AMD is using 99,9% of Ryzen Die.

twitter.com/BitsAndChipsEng/status/877495715316060164

kek today is the day that amd keeps on giving

Intel processors are still better.
>inb4 mad amdpoors

Wow you sure are busy shitting up threads, aren't you?

whats the yield of intels die by comparison

Doesn't surprise me, you'd have to have almost all the cores on a die be unuseable for them to just throw it out.

Ranges from very high on their quad cores to fucking pitiful on their 12+ core Xeons.

ok......
what does that mean?
im looking for a number by subjective bullshit
unless those numbers are secret?

Pretty much. The bigger the die, the higher the failure rate.

They're definitely trade secrets, only trotted out when their marketing value surpasses the cost of your competition knowing too.

>AMD is using 99,9% of Ryzen Die.
Amazing. How does He do it?

This is what Nvidiots think

0.01% single core Ryzens when?

Sadly, they don't have a choice.

Their yelds are ~80% They just use 99.99% of the dies that are good. Either as R3/R5 or threadripper / EPYC cores with the faulty CCX disabled.

It's a great accomplisgment don't get me wrong but it's not the same as 99.99% yelds.

you cant have more than 85% yields unless your start making round dies

they can use the ones with only 1 core per CCX working for the 8 core EPYC

>round dies
I wonder if AMD, Intel or even VIA will try this out
>A shield to protect our corners? We don't need a shield because we don't have corners. Our dies are round!

it's because of the round big silicon wafer.

still, those 99.99% are incredible, the scalability of those ryzen processors is unmatched.

funny thing is there yields are so good amds having trouble producing the R3s, which is why they've been delayed

AYYMD HOUSEFIRES

That one 0.01% will not go to waste. They can use those for the showroom!

EPYC keychains

not too sure about that claim

Round dies would probably be even less efficient, since you're losing some space between the individual dies.

They would, however, what about square wafers?
Pretty much assures you get teh edges you don't get on round wafers.

Though with how wafers are made from silicon ingots that would probably be more expensive too

Why cut down a chip to R3 that would work perfectly as R5/R7?

they could just start selling underclocked r5s if they have to

You get waste elsewhere, it won't solve anything

What does EPYC stand for? Every processor your computer?

ebin

Lets mock intels naming scheme

It stands for
>Intel should never make new ISAs

it's 80% for fully working 8 core dies, so in that last 20% there's literally everything that they can only use on any ryzen with 6 core or less, threadripper with 12 cores or less, and epyc with 24 cores or less

Sounds like bs. R3 and probably future r5 1400 are probably waiting for apus.

But there are going to be 1core per ccx zepplin products in the 8core epyc, which is probably going to sell like it's going off tomorrow with its huge io/memory value.