>stupid to make a nice looking website without piling on tons of unnecessary node shit?
Node isn't front end, it's a javascript back end framework. Plenty of us use C# and Java instead because we're stupid enough to need backends when we're stupid enough to need permanent data.
>After setting up webpack, bundler, npm and a host of other shit you've already spent more time and work than it would've taken to just implement the feature
I reimplemented webpack by reloading scripts every 500ms and bundler is a cancerous concept, NPM too kind of. Get your own damn scripts.
I actually think it's about equivalent if you're a skilled developer. Installing shit is the SAME difficulty for everyone regardless of intelligence or skill but reimplementing everything is surprisingly easy if you know what you're doing.
Shit like webpack/yarn/gulp/bundler/etc is actually hard to install and most these things turn out to be under 10 lines of C# code.
Pure /wdg/ is svg. That way it works identically in all resolutions and is a fraction the file size. Understanding you're not perfect, a 16-24bit png is fine too.
Web dev can be simple, there's Javascript and another language, the other language you use when you realise storing things on the client's computer isn't a good idea.
Theoretically Java can do everything C# can do, although a lot of developers would prefer one over the other.
>PHP
Shit. Outdated. Slow.
>React
The dystopian C++ of Javascript.
>C#
>Wordpress
>love to work on .. ASP.NET MVC
What are you doing? Write that on your website
C# is lovely but any framework written by a team larger than 10 people will almost always be shit. ASP.NET MVC still gives me PTSD, there are a lot of horrible ideas that were used.
Also, your site takes a little long to load. It's not entirely convincing.
Nice background.