Dude that program you made is awesome! can I have the source code?

>dude that program you made is awesome! can I have the source code?
>WHAT THE FUCK I WON'T LET YOU STEAL MY WORK I WORKED SO HARD ON THAT

You're the reason I'm pro-choice.

/thread

I'm not going to run arbitrary code on my computer.
Any project without a makefile is not worth running on your computer.

i release source code that is unrelated to my actual program and nobody ever notices because unless your software has a linux-tier following noone is going to audit it

Fucking devilish.
To be honest most programs probably do this.

Good idea, actually..

what if someone tries to build it

Fuck off, SPA scumbag.

I don't know, but so far I've not had anyone mention it despite the binaries getting 100+ downloads a month. It probably helps that they're Windows applications, I doubt more than 0.01% of winfags have the required software to compile it.

>my brother please help me give me the source to this my email is [email protected] please do the needful

>be botting rs07 w custom skript.
>some boob is begging me for free script.
>copy and paste into paste bin.
>leave out antiban code.

it's pretty much impossible to audit the entire kernel because of its size
>linux projects
depends on the project
there are a lot of shitty old C daemons full of security vulnerabilities out there

see a frogger
pull the trigger

I miss you in /ptg/ threads ;_;

kek

I'm not really into games, how exactly does antiban code work?

And new shit that is complex enough that even an audit may not find a backdoor or intentional vuln. Auditing code is a really hard thing to do. Even harder is writing vulnerable free code. These to things combine to mean that you could easily write functional code that makes it into a project that has intentional vulns and have a way to plausibly deny you mentioned to. I wonder how many devs get paid to do this.
>mfw most people who contribute to oss are getting paid by gov to plant vulns.

Depends on the anti-cheat. For VAC or other signature based anticheats, you would ideally want self modifying code to avoid the signature detection, as well as limiting certain factors that can auto-ban you if you're out ot wack (like spin rate on a spin bot).

"Antiban code" seems odd because you avoid anticheat through design decisions like above, not tack-on code. Unless it's a script that directly attacks and defeats the anticheat. Maybe it disguises memory manipulation.

so thats a no?

ok ill decode it anyway

With it being Runescape, it's probably human-like behavior removed from the script.

I used to email random people all the time ages ago asking for source code. It actually worked 99% of the time.

A small section that creates variations in timings for all the variables used.

I do this for tracking. The code works in both versions, but public source code shows that personally identifiable information is either hashed or deleted. The built binary doesn't do that.

any dick that is not stallmans is not worth sucking

I've tried compiling shit before but I can never seem to do it right ._.

I literally want to blow up India, Indians are subhuman

Very interesting, sounds like that'd be fun to work with.