I have NOT included any intel figures except for the g4560(it was either that or the 1400 alone).
As I said, YES, Ryzen sales are going somewhat well and YES, Amd's marketshare is somewhat expaning.
BUT the Q1 marketshare comparison posted around is deceptive, because it reflects the initial launch hype figures more than anything.
As you can see now in Q2 the sales are going flat if not declining.
And yes, intel is still outselling 4x or 5x across the whole lineup and segments and it's not my fault.
Pls comment.
Follows the detailed pics from OP:
Ian Hughes
1800x 1700x
Josiah Collins
1700 1600x
Adam Gutierrez
1600 1500x
Isaiah Reyes
1400 g4560
It will be interesting to see what R3 will do in this segment desu
Gabriel Evans
What is this? Some kind of level headed discussion with intellectual honesty?
Fuck that, RIP AMD
Ian Allen
yea.. nobody gonna reply ik
Dominic Foster
>Sup Forums circa 2011+6 >expecting well reasoned and intelligent replies i shiggy diggy
Christopher Torres
Oh look, it's the (((Userbenchmark))) guy posting his Intel marketing material again. Did you crop the site name out because everybody knows what a joke it is at this point?
Brody Hughes
Either way it's an improvement over bulldozer the last couple of years.
Then we have OEMs like Dell and HP and Lenovo not having much selection outside of the performance brands. The fact that all these sales are for boxed processors is immense.
Jose Garcia
At least he didn't name the files "amd=dead", "amd=joke" this time.
Anyway, sales for Ryzen will continue to increase as they haven't even released their full product stack yet (R3, TR, RM, etc.), and Zen is far superior to Lulldozer.
James Barnes
Yeah I'd like to see how sales change once there are more OEM prebuilts with Ryzen Mobile and Ryzen 3, Raven Ridge budget options, etc.
Levi Lee
I mention the website in the OP guys.
Here's something to cheer you up(pic related).
1600 is doing extremely well.
Jack Richardson
This is a good reflection of high/mid end desktop CPUs. Most people with low end or laptop CPUs probably don't bother running benchmarking software on them.
Jason Butler
this is not /biz/ gtfo with your shilling to justify the stocks you purchased
the marketshare that matters is server oriented
Xavier Long
I think it reflect gaymens more than anything Only reason people do this is for brag
Kevin Murphy
You're being called a shill because you have no reason as a non-shill to be posting business data. Unless you're an employee, this is meaningless to you.
Nathaniel Cook
Wow, you got BTFO so hard, earlier, you decided to make a whole thread?
Kayden Flores
I work for an ISP and we are replacing all of the intel servers with Ryzen for the lower power usage and massive improvements over intel
Shill all you want it will start climbing towards the end of the year
Parker Carter
You guys are being disingenuous. Of course Ryzen and Amd doing well is relevant, as it means support for your cpu and or spillover to the gpu division etc.
This kinda talk is very common on Sup Forums.
Hell there's been a bunch of AMD stock chatter all over the place in the last month or so.
This isn't even about the marketshare per se, and nobody mentioned stocks.
Nathan Garcia
AMD is huge right now, normies are even writing stock articles about them, and it's in the top 10 all time most traded stocks of all time on Robinhood
Andrew Ortiz
It's pointless to post these figures when UserBench uses a voluntary user base that runs it's benchmarks to calculate it's market share figures and that inherent selection bias skews any meaningful result you can gather which effectively making it null and void from a statistical point of view.
I rather trust Valve on it's Steam Hardware Survey because despite having the same voluntary survey bias, it has a larger user base which covers a bigger population and reduces other types of uncertainty and statistical errors. Unfortunate it can't be trusted either despite that.